Teacher training

Six more ITT providers downgraded under new Ofsted framework

10 out of 22 inspected providers are now below 'good'

10 out of 22 inspected providers are now below 'good'

Six more initial teacher training providers have been downgraded in the latest batch of inspections under the new Ofsted framework.

Ratings have dropped in 13 of 19 school-aged training providers since inspections returned in spring. Under the new inspection regime, the focus shifted from results to what providers teach.

Previously, all initial teacher training provision was ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’. Now 10 of the 22 inspected providers – which includes three inspected for the first time – are ‘inadequate’ or ‘requires improvement’.

North Essex Teacher Training (NETT) lost its 2014 ‘good’ rating after a May inspection found it was ‘inadequate’.

Inspectors said the curriculum was “weak” and “lacks ambition” and that trainees were “not being prepared well enough for their early careers”. In some subjects, trainees were taught “outdated education theories”.

A NETT spokesperson said its acknowledged the findings and had put an action plan in place.

London South Bank University (LSBU) was downgraded from ‘good’ to ‘requires improvement’ in an October report. Inspectors found trainees’ experiences were inconsistent. Communication between mentors, tutors and trainees depended on each staff member’s approach.

“In a few instances, trainees did not feel that their wellbeing was fully considered during the Covid-19 pandemic, but many felt very well supported.”

Ofsted
Chief inspector Amanda Spielman

A LSBU spokesperson said the inspection timing was “unfortunate when our training providers and school partners were still supporting initial teacher education during the pandemic”.

They added the pandemic affected staff and students in many ways “not fully acknowledged by Ofsted”.

The formerly ‘outstanding’ King Edward’s Consortium in Birmingham and Teacher Training Partnership in Stockton-on-Tees have both been rated ‘good’.

The TES Institute went from ‘good’ to ‘requires improvement’, while the University of Buckingham’s primary-age provision dropped from ‘good’ to ‘requires improvement’. Its secondary provision remained ‘good’. The providers were approached for comment.

The sector is awaiting the Department for Education to confirm its controversial reforms, which include all providers having to apply for reaccreditation as soon as next year.



More from this theme

Teacher training

Staff have to ‘drop something’ to fit in ECF, provider admits

Here's what we learned from the National Association of School-Based Teacher Trainers annual conference this week

Samantha Booth
Teacher training

Final ITT review ‘more implementable’, says DfE adviser

Professor Sam Twiselton, who criticised review, says final proposals are 'more flexible, more doable', and hints at implementation delay

Freddie Whittaker
Teacher training

Now Teach goes nationwide with £3m boost to turn more top bosses to teaching

A recruitment programme aimed at persuading high-flying professionals to change career and retrain as teachers has secured £3 million...

Samantha Booth
Teacher training

£184m NPQs funding now available to all schools after DfE U-turn

Funding for four of six qualifications was previously due to be limited to staff in deprived schools

Freddie Whittaker

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *