SEND

SEND: DfE ‘looking into’ how many schools are not inclusive

Children's minister David Johnston reveals he is probing why some schools have far fewer pupils with EHCPs

Children's minister David Johnston reveals he is probing why some schools have far fewer pupils with EHCPs

The government is looking into how many schools are not being inclusive enough for children with SEND, the children’s minister has revealed.

David Johnston told Schools Week while he doesn’t believe non-inclusive schools are “a widespread problem”, cases have been raised with him by MPs where a “particular school in their area may not be being as inclusive as it suggests”. 

He said the department is “looking at the extent to which it is happening, why it’s happening and whether there are any changes that need to be made a result.”

Johnston added: “We’re creating so many more special schools for the children that need special schools, but in the end the vast majority of children with SEN are in mainstream schools. And it’s important that those mainstream schools are meeting their needs.”

He told the Confederation of School Trusts’ SEND and inclusion summit they are looking at cases when “someone says to me ‘David I’ve got a school in my local area where we’ve got such high levels of SEN children and they don’t have a single child with an EHCP, they are all at the other schools and they’ve just been given an outstanding by Ofsted’. 

“We are looking at things like that, I don’t think you should not be inclusive to have that judgement.”

It follows Ofsted’s chief inspector Sir Martyn Oliver revealing how Ofsted will ramp up scrutiny of schools accused of “putting off” children with SEND for applying for a place. Johnston said he has spoken to Oliver about this too. 

‘Uncomfortable’ exclusions

The government’s SEND and alternative provision reforms, currently being trialled, are based on mainstream schools being more inclusive, with a bigger focus on early identification of need. 

But Johnston said he was “concerned” when he hears of schools in areas with “plenty of children with SEN” and “somehow this school seems to have nobody on an EHCP for example. And that’s key obviously for what we’re trying to get to”.

He had a “discomforting” conversation with a parent helpline “who said they had seen a big increase in parents ringing saying their child of [age] 5, 6, 7 had been permanently excluded”.

Johnston said while he doesn’t “deny that there are children at a young age can present really challenging behaviour”, his “personal view is that’s pretty extraordinary to exclude a child of that age” and he was “uncomfortable with that”.

“We are looking in the department at exactly what is going on there, because the whole thrust of our education reforms… is to trust headteachers that it shouldn’t be me sitting in Whitehall saying ‘right, this is what you should do’. 

“However, we also need every school that has on its website what an inclusive place it is to genuinely be inclusive.”

Schools Week investigation last year dug into inclusivity in mainstream schools. Basic data on how many EHCP pupils a school has can be problematic, as a low number could mean a school offers early support and that a statutory plan isn’t needed. 

Defends accountability measures

Johnston was quizzed by an audience member on what she coined as “disincentives” in the system for schools and trusts to be inclusive. 

He said “we want to look at exactly what is going on with schools” but “I don’t think this can be blamed on Ofsted, league tables, things like that. 

“I will absolutely defend Ofsted inspections and league tables and the performance measures we have, partly because… they’ve been so important to improve the level of education for disadvantaged children. 

“And there are people who say scrap them, scrap exams, scrap league tables, scrap Ofsted judgements. So I don’t attribute it to those, but I do nonetheless think there is something going on.”

This week Bury, one of the first safety valve councils, was slammed by inspectors over its “failing” SEND services. Under the scheme, councils agree sweeping reforms in exchange for extra government cash. 

Asked by Schools Week about whether this was a sign the programme isn’t working, Johnston said they have “confidence” in the scheme. 

“We think the safety valve programme really is working. It’s obviously a long term programme where the changes will take time. In Bury’s case in particular, they actually revised their plan with us quite recently. It’s also a new Ofsted inspection framework.” 

Johnston also said the department will “have more to say” about the new national standards for SEND it is proposing in the “coming weeks”. 

Last week it was revealed the government SEND reforms pilot – called the change programme – is nine months behind schedule

Johnston said they were “making lots of good progress”, adding: “Local authorities are on a spectrum of how fast they are delivering the changes, but we are seeing some local authorities absolutely on time with reforms that we’re rolling out and we’re pushing the others to be able to deliver everything that we’ve asked for.” 

More from this theme

SEND

Revealed: Locations of 16 new special schools and trusts to run 7 more

It follows the announcement of £105m capital cash at the spring budget

Freddie Whittaker
SEND

SEND: Some safety valve councils have ‘removed’ deficits – DfE boss

Permanent secretary says government is 'seeing some really good progress from councils'

Freddie Whittaker
SEND

One of first safety valve councils slammed over ‘failing’ SEND services

Damning inspection calls into question again whether controversial bailout scheme is working

Samantha Booth
SEND

Meet the trusts pioneering state-run private special schools

Plans follow revelation of private equity-backed firms making millions from running such schools

Samantha Booth
SEND

SEND reforms pilot already nine months behind schedule

Some changes have gone down like 'cold sick', while others are more popular, consortium member reports

Samantha Booth
SEND

NFER: MATs should create ‘director of SEND’ role

SEND leaders are playing a 'crucial role' in fostering collaboration and assisting individual schools, researchers find

Samantha Booth

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 Comments

  1. This demonstrates a clear lack of understanding of he educational system and its failings. Perhaps those outstanding schools with high SEND and low EHCP numbers are good at identifying and meeting the needs of their students. The numbers of parents and schools applying for Needs Assessments are skyrocketing because schools don’t have the funding, staffing or resources to meet needs.

    Sadly there are also some schools that have a worrying lack of knowledge about SEND and young people’s mental health.

    The system is broken. If the government listened to the unions, they might have a better understanding of the current problems.

  2. Hannah

    Widespread use of punitive zero-tolerance discipline policies in secondary schools have contributed to the current crisis in the education system. We know that these policies disproportionately impact CYP with SEN needs, as behaviours are punished rather than understood as a possible unmet or emerging need. CYP become stuck in cycles of isolation and suspension which further exacerbates distress and leads to labels being sought, and requests for EHCPs to ‘protect’ the CYP. However, mainstream schools then profess not to be able to ‘meet need’. This is happening on a mass scale and must be addressed.

  3. Donna

    No school is, nor cancelled it be, completely inclusive. Although the Salamanca Conference of 1994 issued what has become known as the Salamanca Statement, the idea of fully inclusive is not really possible. For some children mainstream simply is not an option. That said, all mainstream schools could provide for children/young people with neurodiverse conditions or Downs Syndrome, Mild cerebral palsy etc. Unfortunately, the only money to provide this comes from taxation and many people either do not work or do not earn enough to pay tax. With all the things we need in this country such as the NHS (Don’t get me started on GP CCGs who pay private hospitals to treat their patients), social welfare, police and other emergency services etc those with long term conditions are affected by NeoLiberalism which will not change if Labour wins the election unless the personal tax code is lowered to include everyone earning money. Alternatively, VAT could be raised, which again is not wanted. This is why the Government has decided to revamp the PIP system to get the disabled into work. Unfortunately, whilst most can do something, employers do not have the time to provide all that is required and a carer might have to be paid too. Vouchers won’t cover that and so many children with ASNs will start to lose access to education because even less money is available to the mainstream schools.
    Essentially, looking into the problem has been done and redone but we don’t have the money to pay people to write a report if we don’t have the money to give to the schools to provide the support for inclusion. Vouchers won’t cover that, either.

  4. Our mainstream secondary has nurture groups which they are closing and then put the SEN children straight into mainstream classes. They are not adhering to EHCPs and have told parents they won’t despite it being a legal document and putting new parents off who are looking at the school who have a child with SEN. The communication is shocking and they are not taking the children into account at all. All down to statistics as now an accademy and want to be the highest achieving. There’s lack of communication to parents and they announced all of it at 5.55 on a Friday afternoon in a blanket email to all parents of the school. The LA didn’t even know they were doing this untill we as parents informed them.