Ofsted

‘Outstanding’ schools not inspected for 15 years downgraded in first Ofsted reports

Those downgraded have not been inspected for a combined 235 years

Those downgraded have not been inspected for a combined 235 years

Exclusive

Almost three in four schools previously exempt from Ofsted inspections have been stripped of their ‘outstanding’ status in the first round of published reports.

Those downgraded have not been inspected for a combined 235 years. Ash Church of England Primary School, in Somerset, was rated ‘requires improvement’ across the board after it was inspected for the first time in 15 years.

Nearly all of those downgraded were standalone schools – likely to heighten concerns that schools not able to access curriculum support from larger trusts are disadvantaged.

First reports give glimpse into Ofsted ‘outstanding’ crackdown

Twenty-three reports relating to ‘outstanding’ schools were published yesterday. Of those, 19 were graded, section 5 inspections. Four were shorter section 8 inspections.

Top-rated schools are being routinely inspected this term for the first time since 2010 after an exemption was removed.

Ofsted
Amanda Spielman

All ‘outstanding’ schools last visited before 2015 will get a full inspection, while those awarded the top grade since then will face short inspections.

Seventeen schools lost their ‘outstanding’ status – 74 per cent of all reports. While 12 dropped to ‘good’, five were rated ‘requires improvement’.

It is a small sample size, so it is hard to draw wider conclusions. But Ofsted’s chief inspector, Amanda Spielman, suggested earlier this week the number of top-rated schools would halve after visits under the new framework.

She said one in 10 schools achieving the top grade “might be a more realistic starting point for the system”.

Prior to Thursday’s reports, one in five English schools (4,133) were ‘outstanding’.

Which schools are being downgraded?

Of the 17 downgraded schools, all but one is a primary.

The average size of a downgraded primary is slightly below the national average – 226 pupils compared to 282 (the average school size in 2019).

The secondary school that was downgraded is larger than average.

All but one of the 17 downgraded schools are standalone schools, either local-authority maintained or voluntary-aided.

All five schools downgraded two grades were rated ‘requires improvement’ in the ‘quality of education’ section. This is a limiting judgment, meaning schools cannot then gain a higher judgment for overall effectiveness.

Ofsted

At Ash Church, inspectors noted that while “leaders’ plans for improvement have slowed because of the pandemic… the lack of professional development has contributed to a weak curriculum”.

The other two-grade drop schools received ‘good’ ratings in at least two other sections.

Elsewhere, Cove Infant School was pulled up for “weaknesses in the reading curriculum” which “stifled” pupils’ progress.

Natasha Vass, the school’s headteacher, said the judgment was “disappointing” but it has a robust school improvement plan to “turn around the outcome of the inspection relatively swiftly”.

Other schools did not respond to requests for comment.

New inspections ‘challenging and exacting’

Ofsted has sought to soften the blow this week. Chris Russell, the watchdog’s national director of education, said there was “no doubt that under” the current inspection framework that ‘outstanding’ is a “challenging and exacting judgment to achieve.

Ofsted

“So it does mean that you need to be very careful, if, for example, a school that has been judged ‘outstanding’ a good many years ago is inspected again and judged to be ‘good’.

“That doesn’t mean that the school has declined in recent years, in fact the opposite can be the case, so very important, I think, in those circumstances, to read the inspection report really carefully.”

But Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), warned this was “not much comfort to the schools inspected”. It is also “not an easy message to get across to parents and communities”, he added.

Section 5 reports of downgraded schools include a caveat immediately below the judgment which makes clear the previous inspection was under a different framework.

Reports added: “This reflected the school’s overall effectiveness under the inspection framework in use at the time… Judgments in this report are based on the current inspection framework and also reflect changes that may have happened at any point since the last inspection.”

Majority of lighter touch visits still ‘outstanding’

Meanwhile, of the four schools with a section 8 visit, three kept their ‘outstanding’ grade.

However, Ofsted found “the inspection grade might not be as high if a full inspection were carried out now” at Hiltingbury Infant School, in Eastleigh. It will now face a full inspection.

Unless Ofsted has serious concerns over safeguarding or quality of education, these follow-up inspections will usually take place “within one to two years”.



More from this theme

Ofsted

Large online educators face £10k bill for Ofsted accreditation visits

The watchdog has warned the online education sector is currently ‘completely unregulated’

James Carr
Ofsted

ITT providers ‘alarmingly selling specific pedagogies’ as ‘be all and end all’, Ofsted says

Some initial teacher training providers inspected under the new Ofsted framework were “misinforming trainees” by teaching them only specific...

Samantha Booth
Ofsted

‘It’s the right time’: Amanda Spielman defends inspecting Covid-hit schools

The chief inspector came under fire from school leaders at an event who called routine Ofsted inspections mid-Covid "profoundly...

Tom Belger
Ofsted

Ofsted questions arts ‘carousel’ at KS3

Watchdog official says teaching music only in part of the year could affect pupils 'aural memory'

Freddie Whittaker
Ofsted

Downgraded ‘outstanding’ schools may have actually improved, says Ofsted director

Leaders have warned the issue makes the transition to universal inspections 'problematic'

James Carr
Ofsted

Spielman: 1 in 10 ‘outstanding’ schools ‘more realistic’

The Ofsted chief inspector said any downgrades in new inspections are 'win win for everybody'

James Carr

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. Terry Pearson

    I want to pass on my thanks for producing this important and informative piece. The outcomes from the inspections of the schools rated outstanding should raise concerns for all who work in the education sector. As reported, these schools have not been inspected for a number of years and the volume of downgraded schools is somewhat alarming.

    However, we all need to be clear about why this is the case. The reason the schools have not been inspected for such a long time really has nothing to do with the exception ruling of 2010, despite what Ofsted are currently saying to the sector. These schools have not been inspected because Ofsted has chosen not to inspect them. Ofsted has always been able to inspect any school it decides should be inspected. The ruling simply removed schools rated outstanding from routine scheduled inspections.

    So why has Ofsted not inspected these schools? Well, for a number of years Ofsted have used statistical models to identify schools for inspection ‘To make sure inspection resources are allocated where they are needed most and can have the greatest impact’. All schools rated good or outstanding at the last inspection are assessed for risk annually. When sufficient concerns are raised about a school it is added to the annual cycle of inspections. So, all of the schools rated outstanding that have been recently inspected could have been inspected long ago, and possibly several times, by Ofsted. They haven’t though simply because Ofsted’s own risk assessment process has not identified them for inspection.

    Ofsted really should stop using the exemption ruling to hide the inadequacy of its own risk assessment methodology.

  2. I am not surprised about this ofsted reports have been a waste of time for years it’s just the way for the council to make out like they are actually checking the schools what does the ofsted actually come down to what is it the ofsted actually looking for this is what I’d love to know because half of the schools in Birmingham complete waste of time children are coming out of school not being taught anything and then when you ask the school why they will always put it the blame on the parents even though our children are in school most of the day and majority the schools they are children more than we do