Ofsted

What East of England school leaders are saying about Ofsted

The Suffolk Primary Heads' Association's research reveals some pretty damning feedback about Ofsted's framework and inspections, says Rebecca Leek

The Suffolk Primary Heads' Association's research reveals some pretty damning feedback about Ofsted's framework and inspections, says Rebecca Leek

29 May 2023, 5:00

The medical profession has now added its voice to the wide-ranging calls for reform relating to Ofsted that erupted following the death of headteacher, Ruth Perry. An article published by the BMJ this week reports an ‘almost complete loss of confidence in Ofsted’.

As school leaders in the East of England, we felt it important to undertake a structured inquiry to explore perceptions of Ofsted to discern common themes. A survey for leaders was designed by CEOs, headteachers and leads of headteacher associations. It was piloted with a range of professionals including Ofsted inspectors to ensure clarity and objectivity before being shared more widely.

We received 528 responses and have summarised the findings in a report. The participants are broadly reflective of the education sector as a whole, with a ratio of 1:4 secondary to primary colleagues. Special school and early years leaders were represented, 95 per cent of respondents were or had been headteachers and 53 per cent had led teams through an inspection under the current framework.

The ‘loss of confidence’ the BMJ refers to is unequivocally evident throughout the data. Responses are overwhelmingly negative and demonstrate a profession articulating deep dissatisfaction with the impact of the current inspection framework.

Using an effectiveness scale, we asked leaders to rate Ofsted on three areas that were cited as the core purpose of inspections in the last parliamentary review of the regulatory body. These relate to accountability, school improvement and providing information for parents. We used a seven-point scale, ranging from extremely effective to not at all effective.

The overall mean score was 1.8 (largely ineffective) with only 3.4 per cent of leaders judging the effectiveness of Ofsted as largely or extremely effective in all three areas. The lowest effectiveness rating related to whether Ofsted provides parents with the information they need to compare schools on a consistent basis. The mode here was 0 (not at all effective).

The responses articulate a deep dissatisfaction

Lack of consistency is the most common thread across the data. This was apparent in open-text answers and in descriptions of incidents during inspections.

‘Inconsistent’ was also the word with the highest occurrence in answer to this question: If you were judging the overall effectiveness of Ofsted in meeting the aims above, what three words would you use? Nineteen per cent of answers included the word inconsistent. The next three most highly occurring words were: inadequate (18 per cent), requires improvement (17 per cent) and ineffective (14 per cent). Even the 2 per cent of respondents who stated they had no concerns with Ofsted in answer to another question used words like ‘stressful’ and ‘misaligned’, alongside ‘professional’ and ‘detailed’.

When asked to select their top three concerns from a list (including an option for ‘no concerns’), the top four were ‘one-word judgements’ (57 per cent), ‘reliability’ (43 per cent), ‘limiting judgements’ (38 per cent) and ‘impact on schools during inspection’ (34 per cent).

We also asked respondents to give their thoughts in just ten words on an inspection system that would raise standards and improve lives, as Ofsted’s tagline says it does.

Answers included: professional and supportive dialogue, a robust complaints procedure, and a reflection on other countries’ systems with ‘high-trust, low-stakes’ approaches. The ‘one-word judgement’ issue came through again and again, as did ‘unpredictability’, the strain of timeframes and the stress this causes.

These results contradict in no uncertain terms Amanda Spielman’s claim during her April interview with Laura Kuennsberg that “we get plenty of feedback to say that inspection is a constructive professional dialogue”.

In the East of England at least, this survey provides evidence of ‘an almost complete loss of confidence in Ofsted’. The unwillingness from Ofsted to engage with the sector at large, despite the mounting evidence that the system does more harm than good, is of great concern to the profession.

Latest education roles from

Internal Quality Assurance Employability and Distance Learning

Internal Quality Assurance Employability and Distance Learning

Capital City College Group

Distance Learning Tutor

Distance Learning Tutor

Capital City College Group

Event Support Team Leader

Event Support Team Leader

MidKent College

E-Sport Technician

E-Sport Technician

MidKent College

Digital Technician

Digital Technician

MidKent College

Student Welfare Officer

Student Welfare Officer

MidKent College

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Navigating NPQ Funding Cuts: Discover Leader Apprenticeships with NPQs

Recent cuts to NPQ funding, as reported by Schools Week, mean 14,000 schools previously eligible for scholarships now face...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

How do you tackle the MIS dilemma?

With good planning, attention to detail, and clear communication, switching MIS can be a smooth and straightforward process, but...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

How can we prepare learners for their future in an ever-changing world?

By focusing their curriculums on transferable skills, digital skills, and sustainability, schools and colleges can be confident that learners...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Inspiring Education Leaders for 10 Years

The 10th Inspiring Leadership Conference is to be held on 13 and 14 June 2024 at the ICC in...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Ofsted

Councils ‘hamstrung’ from supporting school leaders, review claims

But Ruth Perry's sister criticises council review for 'failing to ask key questions'

Lucas Cumiskey
Ofsted

Ofsted ‘not fit for purpose’, finds ‘alternative big listen’

Organisers of sector-led survey say inspectorate facing ‘existential crisis’

Freddie Whittaker
Ofsted

ASCL: Base Ofsted report cards on ‘slim set of statutory standards’

The heads' union sets out key principles of how Labour's proposed report card should work if they win next...

Lucas Cumiskey
Ofsted

‘Don’t scapegoat leaders over bad Ofsteds’, says top trust boss

United Learning chief's blueprint for Ofsted reform also calls for end of ungraded inspections and 'simplified' primary visits

Lucas Cumiskey

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. I do not understand why, as a parent. you would not want a representative who is highly qualified in childcare to go in and inspect that your childcare setting was being managed properly and given a grade of how safe and tge standard of education your child was receiving. I do agree that some thibgs need to change but we need ofsted to keep an eye on our schools. Perhaps each setting could have an inspection twice on different days in that week and rate the school after considering both inspections. However sad it is about Ruth Perry taking her own life, it shows that if Ofsted had not gone to inspect that school, imagine if it was your child attending and how the school was failing without us as parents knowing. You cannot solely blame ofsted. Perhaps Ms. Perry already knew the outcome which questions why nothing was solved before it took an inspection.

    • Ms Buckley – aside from your ridiculous comments about Ms. Perry (shame on you) I have no issue with a professional body with highly qualified individuals inspecting a school. Having worked in High / Secondary education for 17 years, in all the inspections I’ve been involved with, Ofsted provide neither professional behaviours nor knowledge nor expertise. You seem to have missed the point of the article completely – it is their complete incompetency of inspection and inconsistency of outcomes that cause issue for schools. Ofsted needs to be scrapped and a very different independent organisation created rather than using ex heads with their own axes to grind and their air of infallibility. Separate teams, separate days would be a better starting point. The pressure on all staff is unbearable, the ability to question anyone that is passing about the school in too many ways to mention leaves support staff, admin, cleaners and kitchen staff petrified to step out into corridors – you have no clue.