Schools

Schools can ignore trans pupils’ gender preference, claims attorney general

But heads say claims schools can ban trans pupils from toilets or wearing uniform of their chosen gender just ‘muddy water’

But heads say claims schools can ban trans pupils from toilets or wearing uniform of their chosen gender just ‘muddy water’

The attorney general has claimed it is legal for schools to refuse to use trans children’s preferred pronouns and ban them from using the toilets or uniform of their stated gender.

However, a headteachers’ union accused Suella Braverman of “muddying the waters”, with schools still awaiting official government guidance on how to approach issues of sex and gender.

In an article for the Telegraph, the minister claimed “many schools and teachers” believed they had “an absolute legal obligation to treat children who are gender questioning according to the preference of the child”.

But she said any decision to “accept and reinforce” a child’s transgender status should only be taken “after all safeguarding processes have been followed, medical advice obtained and a full risk assessment conducted, including taking into account the impact on other children”.

“I hope that understanding the law will free schools to act in each and every child’s best interest rather than being driven by a misunderstanding of legal duties.”

‘Don’t punish kids who refuse to use preferred pronouns’

In her article and a speech to the Policy Exchange think tank, the attorney general said it was lawful for single-sex schools to refuse to admit pupils of the opposite sex who identify as transgender.

She also said it was legal for mixed schools to refuse to let trans girls use girls’ toilets or dormitories, wear a girl’s uniform or participate in girls’ single-sex sport.

Schools can also “refuse to use the preferred opposite sex pronouns of a child”.

She also said pupils should “not be punished for refusing to adopt a preferred pronoun for a gender-questioning child in a case where the school has decided to affirm a child’s preference”.

Schools that “socially transition” a child without the knowledge or consent of parents or medical advice increasing their “exposure to a negligence claim for breach of their duty of care to that child”, she added.

Braverman claimed this was the “proper interpretation” of the equality act. But legal experts have since questioned it.

Sarah Woosey, an education law expert at Simpson Millar, acknowledged the equality act “does not expressly say that schools must automatically recognise someone under the gender which they identify as”. But she added that “similarly it does not say that they cannot”.

“Furthermore, one would question how a school could comply with their duty to not discriminate against a child if they simply refuse to acknowledge a child or young person’s gender identity rather than gender at birth.”

Toilets and uniform decisions ‘up to schools’

Braverman’s comments focused on what she described as “misinterpretation” of the 2010 equality act, which states that both biological sex and gender reassignment are protected characteristics.

trans
Berman

Under the act, the characteristic of gender reassignment applies “if the person is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process (or part of a process) for the purpose of reassigning the person’s sex by changing physiological or other attributes of sex”.

But Laura Berman, partner at Stone King, said “at no point in the act does it say that it only bites when medical advice is received”.

Stating schools could refuse to allow trans children to wear the uniform or use the toilet of their stated gender was “not my reading of the equality act.

“On my understanding, there is nothing in the act that allows schools to delay acceptance of a child’s transgender status until medical advice is obtained, a risk assessment is conducted or the impact on others is taken into account.”

Schools navigated difficult territory ‘for years’

Braverman made several other claims in her speech, including that “ideologies” that distinguish between sex and gender are “being taught in some schools without any democratic scrutiny or consideration of the consequences”.

She also claimed that a primary school teaching year 4 children words and phrases such as transgender, gender dysphoria or queer would be “falling foul of government guidance”, though it is not clear what guidance she was referring to.

Schools that teach four-year-olds “that people can change sex or gender” would also be breaching their impartiality duties, she claimed.

trans
Barton

Geoff Barton, from heads’ union ASCL, said Braverman’s comments seemed to “muddy the waters rather than provide any clarity”.

Schools had been “navigating this difficult territory on their own for many years making decisions which serve the best interests of all their pupils”, he added.

“She says that any decision by schools to ‘accept and reinforce a child’s declared transgender status’ should only be taken after medical advice is obtained and a full risk assessment conducted. Is this official government guidance to schools?

“Nobody knows because the government has still not actually consulted on or published any guidance.”

Natalie Arnett, NAHT’s senior equalities officer, said school leaders were “having to make difficult decisions with serious legal and safeguarding implications, often with minimal training on these issues”.

“What they really need now is clear legal guidance from the government so that they can feel confident in the decisions they take. Until we have that school leaders will continue to be placed in an extremely difficult position.”

Other leaders on Twitter criticised the government for using school pupils to fight their culture wars.

Latest education roles from

IT Technician

IT Technician

Harris Academy Morden

Teacher of Geography

Teacher of Geography

Harris Academy Orpington

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Exams Assistant

Exams Assistant

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Solihull College and University Centre

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

It’s Education’s Time to Shine: Celebrate your Education Community in 2025!

The deadline is approaching to nominate a colleague, team, whole school or college for the 2025 Pearson National Teaching...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Navigating NPQ Funding Cuts: An Apprenticeship Success Story

Last year’s NPQ funding cuts meant that half of England’s teachers faced costs of up to £4,000 to complete...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Embedding Formative Assessment: not just a box-ticking exercise but something long-term and meaningful for all

Our EFA programme has been proven to help schools achieve better GCSE results, as evidenced by the EEF. Find...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Building capacity in family support to tackle low school attendance 

Persistent and severe school absence impacts children, families, and communities—especially in disadvantaged areas. School-Home Support’s Attendance Support and Development Programme...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Schools

Cease and desist: Trust supports staff to sue online trolls

Provision for staff sickness cover will be broadened to cover defamation

Jack Dyson
Schools

Head scores victory as Google agrees to delete school reviews

Tech giant says all school reviews will now be deleted because of ‘consistent off-topic and harmful’ comments

Rhi Storer
Schools

‘I don’t remember it being this bad’: Teachers reveal scale of Labour’s school-ready promise

Survey reveals mismatch in expectations between teachers and parents over what 'being school ready' means

Rhi Storer
Schools

Big academy trust given £1.5m government loan to stay afloat

A 24-school trust racked up seven-figure losses after paying for iPads for staff and pupils

Jack Dyson

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. She’s unqualified for her job and the advice she’s providing is illegal.

    When Sinnot proposed that this kind of ban was legal, she was told that she was ‘wrong in law’ and sent packing. The Equality Act 2010 has always held that inclusion is the default, unless in cases of a legitimate and proportional aim. Braverman’s personal prejudices against trans children do not fulfil that criteria.

    And even if it weren’t illegal, what sort of sorry, disgusting excuse for a governmental minister, teacher, *person*, would advocate for the abuse and bullying of children based on their gender identity?

    Let alone the implication that she thinks trans children should be outed to their parents (exposing the children to violence and abuse). Utterly sickening, vile behaviour.