No ‘strong evidence’ of retention boost from teacher student loan forgiveness

Pilot that reimburses teachers their tuition fee repayments had 'subtle' influence on career choices

Pilot that reimburses teachers their tuition fee repayments had 'subtle' influence on career choices

An evaluation of a trial which forgives student loan repayments for teachers in shortage subjects and supply cold spots has found no “strong evidence” that it aids retention.

The report by CFE Research into the teacher student loan reimbursement scheme found its influence on teachers’ career choices was “subtle”, and that its impact was “limited” for staff who had concerns over workload and their work-life balance.

Proposals to forgive teachers’ student loan repayments were first promised in the Conservatives’ 2017 general election manifesto. A pilot in 26 areas was announced later that year.

Teachers who qualified between 2013 and 2021 and spend at least half of their time teaching languages, biology, chemistry, computing or physics are eligible to claim back repayments for up to 11 financial years into their teaching careers.

But a statistical analysis conducted by the DfE “did not find strong evidence of any
effect of receiving [loan forgiveness] on teacher retention”.

There was a “small difference in year-on-year leaver rates” between those whose loans were forgiven and those whose loans were not.

But the “size and variability of the pilot, with additional variability caused by the Covid pandemic, meant that the analysis was not sufficient to determine whether this was due to a real effect of the pilot, or random variation”.

The evaluation looked at impact on teacher recruitment and retention, and relied on a survey of teachers and interviews with teachers and heads alongside the statistical analysis.

Only a third of those surveyed said financial incentives motivated them to continue in teaching, and 17 per cent were “very motivated” by them.

Cash boost can’t counteract workload woes

However, the influence of loan reimbursement also increased with the amount.

Thirty-two per cent of survey respondents said an annual forgiveness of £1,656, or £138 per month, would be “very influential” on their decision to remain a teacher, compared to 6 per cent who said the same for a £312 annual, or £26 monthly reimbursement.

Respondents who said teaching did not offer a good work-life balance and that workload was unmanageable were less likely to say they would remain in the profession, with these factors “statistically related to the likelihood to leave teaching within five years”.

“Therefore, [loan forgiveness] appears limited in how it counteracts these factors in these specific circumstances.”

Forgiveness had “some influence on retaining teachers who thought their workload was manageable and amongst those more concerned about their student debt”.

The evaluation found individuals entered teaching for “many reasons”, with financial incentives just “one factor amongst many”.

In 2019, just 7 per cent of trainees said loan forgiveness would “strongly influence” which subject they would teach. The evaluation “consistently found altruistic motivations had a stronger influence on teacher recruitment”.

Bursaries best cash incentive, but teachers have other motivations

At every stage of the evaluation, teachers said they were “motivated to teach because they loved their subject and wanted to make a difference to children’s lives”.

Bursaries, which pay more money at the beginning of teachers’ careers, were noted as the “most influential financial incentive for teachers entering the profession”.

In 2019, 24 per cent of teachers interested in loan forgiveness said they would consider moving to an eligible school if they could commute. Fourteen per cent said they would move to an eligible area if it was like their current home.

The scheme “exerted influence alongside other teaching and lifestyle factors when making choices about next steps”.

The survey found 33 per cent of eligible teachers in pilot areas who did not claim were not aware of the scheme.

Many headteachers also reported “little knowledge” of the programme apart from the general concept. This meant they “could not alert prospective teachers to benefits like TSLR as part of recruitment”.

Headteachers also “often said they promote targeted financial incentives discretely”, because “most thought that such incentives can be divisive within the school”.

“They explained that teachers who are not eligible for these incentives work just as hard as those who are eligible, which can cause issues amongst staff. On balance, interviewed headteachers did not see [loan forgiveness] as a primary recruitment or retention tool.”

More from this theme


Heads and teachers working longer despite workload push

Key government workforce survey reveals longer working weeks, less job satisfaction and more anxiety

Samantha Booth

Number of children ‘missing education’ rises a quarter

117,000 children were not registered at a school and not receiving a suitable education elsewhere at some point last...

Freddie Whittaker

‘Elite’ Star and Eton sixth forms reveal ‘clearing house’ careers role

Partnership between academy trust and top private school also opens new 'think and do' tank

Schools Week Reporter

Reception baseline test: Partial move to digital delayed

Standards and Testing Agency had planned to move some elements of the test on-screen from 2024

Freddie Whittaker

Give parents termly window to request childcare, schools told

Ahead of the launch of the wraparound childcare programme, the government has published new guidance for schools

Jack Dyson

Labour’s school improvement teams will deliver misogyny training

Research shows rise in references to sexual harassment, abuse and safeguarding incidents in Ofsted reports

Freddie Whittaker

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. D knights

    I have sent many letters to the education ministers asking clearly as to why teachers after decades are still paying hundreds of pounds a month to have trained. With interest rates now at 9% on the debt, salary increases are pointless. Teachers that have continued to take additional post grad qualifications to support the needs of the students, now have to pay over 400£ a month for two student loans. It is not sensible to do this as the work load increases but the money really doesn’t as it merely settles the interest. In addition to the appalling behaviour experienced , working hours and traveling- this leads a sensible person to ask why?

    Student loans should be forgiven after 7 years. Not exploitation of teachers to pay interest on training that is needed to understand such an important job. Why has this not be completed?