Prevent review: Schools need ‘independent’ monitoring and better training

Shawcross review of counter-extremism duty warns of 'ambiguity' of how schools' compliance is monitored

Shawcross review of counter-extremism duty warns of 'ambiguity' of how schools' compliance is monitored

8 Feb 2023, 18:05

More from this author

A review of Prevent warns there is not enough oversight of schools' compliance with the duty

Schools’ compliance with the Prevent counter-extremism duty should be monitored by an “independent oversight function”, and staff need improved training to meet it, a government-commissioned review has found.

The review by William Shawcross warned of “ambiguity” over how schools’ compliance with the duty is monitored. Some frontline school staff also need “strengthened training on the causes of radicalisation and the ideological nature of terrorism”, it found.

Introduced in 2015, Prevent requires teachers to identify pupils at risk of radicalisation and report incidents they believe are linked to extremism or terrorism.

Education settings are the most common source of referrals to the programme, accounting for 36 per cent, or 2,305 referrals in the year to March 31 2022.

Although it found the duty was “well-embedded” in schools, the Shawcross review today warned that schools, further education and childcare providers are “not formally monitored for compliance with the duty”.

DfE and Ofsted ‘largely reactive’

Checking compliance currently “falls under the auspices of Ofsted and the DfE”, which “largely take a reactive approach with issues alerted to them”.

Shawcross said he considered “this ambiguity a potential risk for effective Prevent delivery”, adding that an independent oversight function would “strengthen compliance”.

In its formal recommendations, the report proposed the creation of a new standards and compliance unit answerable to ministers on the Prevent oversight board.

The purpose of the unit “should be to process and investigate complaints from
Prevent practitioners and the wider public”, it said.

Home secretary Suella Braverman has accepted Shawcross’s recommendations in full, and the Home Office said the new unit would “provide a clear and accessible route for the public and practitioners to raise concerns about Prevent activity where it may have fallen short of its standards”.

It is not clear, however, if the new unit will take on the role of monitoring school compliance, or if this will remain with Ofsted and the DfE.

Prevent duty ‘well-embedded’ in schools

Overall, the report found the duty was well embedded and broadly well understood in the schools sector.

However, while “working relationships” between schools and Prevent were also praised, it warned some frontline education staff lacked the proper training.

For example, the review said the DfE’s analysis of schoolchildren travelling or attempting to travel to Syria to join the so-called Islamic State stated that in the majority of cases there was “no prior indication of extremism”.

But Shawcross said he was “concerned” that not all practitioners were “sufficiently adept” at recognising how ideological drivers of terrorism present in young people, and were missing signs of “radicalisation risk”.

In its formal recommendations, the review said the government should ensure Prevent training “upholds a consistent and proportionate threshold across ideological threats and avoids using double standards”.

Training for Prevent and public sector staff subject to the duty should also “include clear guidance on how and when to make appropriate referral decisions”.

It must also “clearly specify new Prevent thresholds and the requirement to ensure referrals have an identifiable ideological element and terrorism risk”.

The Home Office said Prevent would “overhaul its training and guidance for all staff, and introduce a security threat check, to ensure all decision-making is aligned with the current threat”.

More from this theme


Hinds says ‘all schools’ restrict phones, and 5 more key findings

Schools minister also says the 'option' of statutory mobile phone guidance remains

Freddie Whittaker

CST calls for policy changes over ‘unsustainable’ parent complaints

Academy body says rise in complaints is putting 'significant pressure on school leaders’

Jack Dyson

Poverty: Trusts spend six-figure sums to support ‘crisis’ families

News comes amid calls for chancellor Jeremy Hunt to hand out more education cash in next week's budget

Jack Dyson

Heads and teachers working longer despite workload push

Key government workforce survey reveals longer working weeks, less job satisfaction and more anxiety

Samantha Booth

Number of children ‘missing education’ rises a quarter

117,000 children were not registered at a school and not receiving a suitable education elsewhere at some point last...

Freddie Whittaker

‘Elite’ Star and Eton sixth forms reveal ‘clearing house’ careers role

Partnership between academy trust and top private school also opens new 'think and do' tank

Schools Week Reporter

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Victor Burnop

    And businesses up and down the country take PREVENT training seriously? White van man? Other small businessesnFocus your attention somewhere else. Gravy train express inbound …again, for some.

  2. Schools are obviously to blame, NOT. This is just another duty dumped on schools when other government departments and policies fail. A “catch all” so that government can say that they are doing something. Education has a role but add up the cost of the hours spent training every teacher specifically when we all are already very sensitive to and very quickly spot children with a whole range of issues and refer them on, and one questions if the current strategies is value for money. How many students have been found to be dangerously radicalised that weren’t like to be picked up by other means? How many of those wouldn’t have begun if content on the internet had been properly regulated and the large social media companies been defined as publishing houses?
    It’s the layering of ever more onto classroom teachers that’s responsible for the burn out rate and the strike action going on now. Over burdening, OFSTED, micromanagement and the blame game started around 1980 and the system has been going into decline since and part of the reason we don’t have the high skills high wage economy we could have developed over the intervening 43 years.