The new computer science GCSE is already being reviewed


The key architects of the computer science GCSE have launched a major review into the qualification as pupil uptake stagnates, with girls particularly shunning the subject.

Schools Week can reveal the British Computer Society (BCS) review will also look at whether the subject – only introduced in 2014 – now needs to be overhauled in favour of a “broader qualification”.

While 12 per cent more pupils took the computing GCSE this year, the numbers of pupils studying ICT plunged by 44 per cent, attributed to the decision by schools minister Nick Gibb to scrap the latter qualification from last year.

Gibb hoped the move – heavily criticised by many in the sector, including the BCS – would push pupils into the “more academic” computing GCSE, one of former education secretary Michael Gove’s reforms.

However, new figures show that nearly 23,000 fewer pupils left school this year without a qualification in a computer-related subject, a drop of 17 per cent from last year.

BCS director of education Julia Adamson said that when the body proposed a more “theoretical” computer science qualification, they assumed the ICT GCSE would continue as an alternative.

Now we’re in a position where ICT is no longer available and the focus is too narrow

“Now we’re in a position where ICT is no longer available and the focus is too narrow.”

The school curriculum and qualifications review committee will be launched next month and it will be led by Muffy Calder, professor of computer science at the University of Glasgow.

Adamson told Schools Week that the review will look at whether a “broader” qualification is required, rather than the current focus on coding and programming.

The idea has the backing of Miles Berry, a lecturer in computing education at the University of Roehampton, who added: “At the moment we have a national curriculum with a GCSE in only part of it.”

National figures also show 57,245 boys sat the computer science GCSE, compared with only 14,683 girls this summer.

It means that 30,000 fewer girls sat a key stage 4 computing subject this year than four years ago.

READ MORE: How computing won the day

Berry added that Ofsted should also review computing in schools to investigate anecdotal evidence that girls are engaged in coding at primary school, but drop off later on in their school life.

Research by the Roehampton Annual Computing Education Report in 2016 also found pupil premium pupils were under-represented in GCSE computing.

Another computer science teacher, who did not wish to be named, said he would like to see a “general qualification” covering programming but also Photoshop, iMovie, web design and Excel, with pupils specialising through projects.

The government has previously insisted that other vocational qualifications in IT are still available for pupils.

But Kay Sawbridge, a computer science and IT teacher, said parents just aren’t keen on non-GCSEs.

The decline could also be attributed to schools promoting the traditional triple sciences at the expense of computer science, she added. This pushes the subject, which counts as an EBacc science under progress 8, into the final “bucket” of subject choices, where Sawbridge said most pupils prefer to pick a creative subject like drama or art.

Ofqual will also launch a consultation later this year over its plan to scrap the GCSE computing practical assessment last year after tests were leaked.

The ban will extend until 2020.

However, immediate change doesn’t look likely after education secretary Damian Hinds said there will be no more curriculum changes during this Parliament.

A Department for Education spokesperson said entries to computer science “continue to rise” and an £84 million cash injection will “drive up participation in computer science”.


‘Girls say no’: new fund for gender balance

A £2.4 million pilot to attract more girls into computing will launch next year as ministers desperately seek to redress the subject’s emerging gender imbalance.

The tender for a ‘Gender Balance in Computing’ pilot published in June asked for “innovative interventions” to encourage girls to choose computer science GCSE and A-level.

Set to run from January 2019, the pilot follows alarm among teachers about the failure of computer science to attract enough girls since the subject was launched in 2015.

READ MORE: Computing revolution is excluding girls and poor pupils

Girls made up only 16 per cent of computing GCSE pupils in 2015, rising to just 20 per cent this year, according to the Joint Council for Qualifications, compared to 43 per cent in the ICT GCSE three years ago.

At A-level, only nine per cent of computing pupils were girls in 2015, rising to just 12 per cent this year. Again, 35 per cent were girls in the ICT A-level three years ago.

The programme will run across “a range of state-funded schools” up until 2022.

Interventions will be designed so they can be “robustly tested” and can be scaled up if there is evidence of a positive impact.

The DfE said the pilot should help girls to “see themselves as active creators of digital technology, not just passive consumers”.

Latest education roles from

Teacher – Leadership and Management & Project Management

Teacher – Leadership and Management & Project Management

Gateshead College

Trainer/Assessor – Construction (Electrical)

Trainer/Assessor – Construction (Electrical)

Gateshead College

Casual Teacher – Hair and Beauty

Casual Teacher – Hair and Beauty

Gateshead College

EA to the CEO & Senior Directors

EA to the CEO & Senior Directors

Haberdashers’ Academies Trust South

Chief Executive Officer Cornwall Education Learning Trust (CELT)

Chief Executive Officer Cornwall Education Learning Trust (CELT)

Satis Education

Head of Faculty (History and RS)

Head of Faculty (History and RS)

Ark Greenwich Free School

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Andrew Howard

    Two subjects are needed, a GCSE in ICT and a GCSE in Computer Science. Uptake is improving in my school, with 40 percent of my year 12’s being female this year. However, ICT is a vital skill for the workplace and a new GCSE should be introduced, as it is a seperate and needed subject.

  2. It would be nice to see some progress on this and we will only get this if we remove from the discussion, university lecturers who have no idea of what happens with in schools, Computing at Schools, a body which is a irrelevance to 95% of CS teachers and has a management which also knows little or nothing about what happens in the overwhelming majority of schools and BCS which has the same attributes.
    Listen to ordinary teachers.

  3. Gavin Craddock

    The old GCSE ICT was very simple, hence why teachers loved it and lot of students did it – a little bit of PowerPoint and a simple spreadsheet gets you the GCSE. The Government was right in my opinion to scrap it, but wrong in that it didn’t replace it.

    Any new qualification will have the chicken and egg problem – if it isn’t easy enough for existing IT teachers to grasp, it will wither and die. But if it’s as easy as the old GCSE was, it won’t (or shouldn’t) be approved by the Government.

  4. I agree with one of the posts above. BCS and Computing At School are completely out of touch with the reality of schools and the nature of students thinking about/taking Computer Science.

    Computer Science GCSE has some spectacular failures implicit in the spec.
    I firmly blame zealous academics who aren’t living in the real world; they’ve had far too much skewed input into the shape and content of the course.

    E.g. a nationally determined 20 hour project with no differentiation for lower-ability students. Rigid conditions that have no bearing to real world ways of working, such as strict adherence to a waterfall methodology. Madness!
    Whoever decided such rules are clearly not class teachers in a secondary school.