CPD

Labour will need to tackle education’s shameful secret

A teacher training entitlement will achieve nothing unless ministers address the elephant in the teacher training room

A teacher training entitlement will achieve nothing unless ministers address the elephant in the teacher training room

24 Sep 2024, 11:40

Schools, and the academy trusts that often run them, cannot afford to spend money that does not clearly and directly benefit young people or teachers. Currently, they spend around £500 per teacher per year on professional development on top of an estimated £1,123 per year for five INSET days. But is it money well spent? 

It’s no secret that school budgets have been stretched in recent years, with total school spending per student falling by 9 per cent in real terms in England between 2009/10 and 2019/20.  This decline represents the most substantial and sustained cut in England in at least 40 years.

But when you look at the academic reviews of professional development, those that have been evaluated show that one-third had no discernible impact on student achievement. And that’s just on the interventions that have been subject to proper evaluation. 

A recent survey asked just over 9,000 teachers whether the professional development they had taken part in in the last year had helped to improve their performance. Less than one-quarter of teachers strongly agreed that it had.

Just this week, Teacher Tapp surveyed the profession again. This time, they asked whether teachers rated the INSET they’d had at the start of term as any good.  Only 16 per cent said it was very useful. I wonder how we’d feel if students felt the same about the teaching they experienced.

As one teacher recently described in a repsonse to a Steplab survey: “Professional development is often ad-hoc, sessions primarily follow a PowerPoint style with lots of generalised content not specific to individual needs, and it mostly feels like a waste of time.” Frankly, the profession deserves better.

In short, it isn’t money well spent, and almost everyone knows it. The sector’s shameful secret is that it wastes thousands of precious hours and effectively burns piles of cash year on year on professional development that doesn’t work.

As a former teacher, I’m glad the new government supports a teacher training entitlement to provide educators with professional development throughout their careers. However, they have yet to spell out what this will look like.

It wastes thousands of hours and burns piles of cash

It should be evident to all that we can’t afford to waste teachers’ valuable time and schools’ limited resources on things that make no difference to students. In order to meet the entitlement’s key aims of retaining teachers and improving outcomes, we need high-quality, evidence-informed professional development.

So, what do we know about what actually works? 

Hard evidence shows that effective professional development can improve teachers’ knowledge, teaching practices, and student test scores.  Indeed, evidence from replicated randomised controlled trials shows that effective teacher professional development programmes can have large positive effects on what happens in the classroom and what students learn.

To achieve these benefits, schools need to put in place teacher professional development that provides bespoke support, focusing on the deliberate development of specific aspects of teaching, and using important mechanisms of teacher learning like modelling and rehearsal. 

Those who do this well – often  by taking an instructional coaching approach – see increased student achievement by around four months of additional progress.

If we don’t take heed of this evidence, we do a disservice to the teachers we aim to train and will continue to haemorrhage teachers who want to develop as professionals.

It’s brilliant that the government aims to get more people into teaching, but it’s fundamentally pointless if there isn’t also a plan to hold on to them. Thoughtful professional development is key to this.

The government has recognised this, and the teacher training entitlement is a positive step in that direction. But not if all it entitles teachers to is a boring PowerPoint in a stuffy room at the start of term while everyone daydreams about their holiday.

Especially in these straitened times, we should only invest time and money into things that actually make a difference. The present model of teacher development represents a shameful waste of resource, and delivering this new entitlement must be tied to its thoughtful reform.

Latest education roles from

Head of Mathematics

Head of Mathematics

Shireland CBSO Academy

Assistant Principal Curriculum (Young People & SEND) – Bradford College

Assistant Principal Curriculum (Young People & SEND) – Bradford College

FEA

Assistant Principal Curriculum (Adults, Apprenticeships & Higher Education) – Bradford College

Assistant Principal Curriculum (Adults, Apprenticeships & Higher Education) – Bradford College

FEA

History Teacher

History Teacher

Platanos College

Maths Teacher

Maths Teacher

Platanos College

Mathematics Tutor (Variable Hours)

Mathematics Tutor (Variable Hours)

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Cutting-edge technology allows students to hold virtual conversations with Holocaust survivors.

Testimony 360, the new programme from the Holocaust Educational Trust uses innovative technology to bring the people and places...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

ASDAN’s digital future: Developing a dynamic, learner-led curriculum to empower learners with diverse needs.

ASDAN’s new CEO, Melissa Farnham, outlines a dynamic future for the charity and awarding organisation aligned to the government’s...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Safeguarding in schools: staying on top of school monitoring in the new academic year

With the rise in bullying, vaping, and security threats, each school must act to create a secure environment that...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

The September Snapshot: What Back-to-School Questions Should School Leaders Ask Staff?

The start of a new school year is the perfect time to set a clear direction, establish expectations, and...

Victoria

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

  1. Annoyed Millennial

    As soon as I saw the words modelling and rehearsal being suggested this article changed from something I was in support of to something that made me gag.

    Has the writer stood in one of the MATs that makes you do these “rehearsal” sessions where you have to pretend to teach, pretend to behavior manage, pretend to be in these situations.

    The LAST thing this profession needs is to be treated more like babies. I have never come out of one of these sessions feeling it was good.

    How about funding PROPER professional development courses again, like subject area masters degrees. Not NPQ’s or the other rubbish I have been subjected to.

    Give us freedom and trust us as adults again.

  2. Pointless indeed. There are lots of high quality online courses (sponsored by the Government) available through reputable colleges covering topics like bullying, mental health of young people, SEND needs etc that result in real qualifications (usually Level 2 or 3) that are relevant to teaching and can add value to a CV. Far better use of time than the nonsense many of us have to sit through in the name of school based ‘development’.

  3. Magdalene Lake

    Training is too often a too short, one off presentation with no follow up. All the evidence says that this doesn’t work, but headteachers have ticked a box and don’t have the time or money to devote to proper professional development. Development is necessarily slow and incremental, but headteachers need quick fixes to please ofsted.
    As a consultant, I am always frustrated at this approach. People value my input, but teaching is complex and children are individuals. We need long term professional development. I know that, however much staff have enjoyed the session, 90% will be forgotten in two weeks with no individual follow up.

  4. Speaking as someone who worked as a lead practitioner, an advanced skills teacher, regional coordinator for the UK’s biggest ever teacher training initiative and who has supervised multiple trainee teachers through convoluted accreditation I can tell you without any doubt most teacher trading, in particular teacher training days in schools is a complete waste of time that rarely results in changes in practice in the actual classroom. You can take a horse to water but you can’t make it drink.Present a young teacher with, say, a streamline method of assessing students and 6 months later they are still using some prolonged inefficient manual method while complaining about being overworked. The two underpinning pillars of change are training and infrastructure (such as a fully working IT network sadly absent in most schools). Often one is delivered without or not in step the other. I’ve seen a few good examples of effective teacher trading but “death by PowerPoint” isn’t one of them