Ofsted

‘Independent’ inquiry’s critical Ofsted poll mostly NEU members

Leaders slam self-selecting sample of union-funded group that is 'dressed up as independent'

Leaders slam self-selecting sample of union-funded group that is 'dressed up as independent'

Exclusive

The National Education Union has been accused of pushing its anti-Ofsted agenda through a supposedly “independent inquiry” after it published a biased survey heavily critical of the inspectorate.

The poll, published by the Beyond Ofsted inquiry on Wednesday, said 92 per cent of teachers agreed Ofsted was not a “reliable and trusted arbiter of standards”.

It attracted national press coverage, with journalists told the research was conducted by the UCL Institute of Education.

However, when asked by Schools Week, the inquiry – which was set up and is funded by the union – admitted the survey was self-selecting. This is considered a common type of research bias because respondents choose to take part, making it unrepresentative.

Emails from the union, which wants to abolish Ofsted, urged members to complete the survey. Social media posts encouraging participation also included the tag #replaceOfsted

Seventy-nine per cent of the 6,708 survey respondents identified as National Education Union (NEU) members.

Stuart Lock, the chief executive officer at Advantage Schools, said self-selecting samples made by campaigning groups ”dressed up as independent” muddied the waters and did not help the sector or Ofsted to improve, “and hence don’t help colleagues in schools or their pupils”.

Beyond Ofsted launched in April to “consider input from a wide range of well-informed voices” to “develop a set of principles for underpinning a better inspection system and proposals for an alternative approach”. Its website states it is sponsored by the union.

Full report due later this month

It is chaired by Lord Jim Knight, a former schools minister, with a board of 16 – several of whom are vocal Ofsted critics.

The survey findings were released on Wednesday as a preview to the full report, due later this month.

It found 62 per cent of teachers did not think their most recent inspection accurately reflected their school, including a majority of those in ‘good’ and ‘outstanding’ schools.

While not the same question, 91 per cent of leaders responding to Ofsted’s own post-inspection survey data stated judgments made by inspectors were justified.

In the Beyond Ofsted survey, almost 75 per cent of respondents described their experience with the watchdog as negative.

But Ofsted’s own survey found just 16 per cent of state-funded schools disagreed the benefit of inspection outweighed any negative aspects.

Steve Caldwell, the deputy head of Helsby Hillside Primary School in Cheshire, said it was “all too easy to fall into the trap of agreeing with the inquiry’s findings because of our own negative views about Ofsted.

“Ofsted does need reform, but desperately clinging to headlines from poorly designed surveys is not the way to do it. It makes our arguments look weak, and makes us easier to dismiss and ignore. We need a much more robust approach than this.”

An NEU social media post in May called for school leaders to step down from serving as inspectors and remove references to Ofsted in school.

NEU encouraged members to take part

The same post said “support the inquiry and complete the survey. It’s time to look #BeyondOfsted”, alongside an anti-Ofsted slogan asking “how do we #replaceOfsted?”

Schools Week found examples of the inquiry’s researchers sending survey links to people who posted critical Ofsted comments on social media.

Professor Kathy Rastle, from Royal Holloway, University of London, said independence was hard to establish “given that the survey was hosted on a website that argues that Ofsted has ‘lost trust’” with staff and pupils.

Lord Jim Knight
Lord Jim Knight

“Inquiries of this nature are most valuable when they are independent. That means that they come at the problem in an unbiased way and take steps to ensure a representative set of views.”

Professor John Jerrim, of the UCL Institute of Education (IOE), added such examples “stop Ofsted doing more research into the key issue of inspection reliability or consistency.

“Why make data, etc, that could be used for this purpose available to researchers, when the dice are going to be loaded against them?”

However a spokesperson for the inquiry said they were “satisfied with the integrity of the research and are confident that will be evident when the full report is published”.

They added that researchers Professors Jane Perryman and Alice Bradbury made efforts to ensure the survey was distributed as widely as possible. Results from both NEU and non-NEU members were “broadly similar”, they said.

Knight told Schools Week there was no way he would be an NEU “stooge”.

A union spokesperson said it was a “serious research exercise conducted by established academics” and that the findings were independent of the union

Latest education roles from

IT Technician

IT Technician

Harris Academy Morden

Teacher of Geography

Teacher of Geography

Harris Academy Orpington

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Exams Assistant

Exams Assistant

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Solihull College and University Centre

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

It’s Education’s Time to Shine: Celebrate your Education Community in 2025!

The deadline is approaching to nominate a colleague, team, whole school or college for the 2025 Pearson National Teaching...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Navigating NPQ Funding Cuts: An Apprenticeship Success Story

Last year’s NPQ funding cuts meant that half of England’s teachers faced costs of up to £4,000 to complete...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Embedding Formative Assessment: not just a box-ticking exercise but something long-term and meaningful for all

Our EFA programme has been proven to help schools achieve better GCSE results, as evidenced by the EEF. Find...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Building capacity in family support to tackle low school attendance 

Persistent and severe school absence impacts children, families, and communities—especially in disadvantaged areas. School-Home Support’s Attendance Support and Development Programme...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Ofsted

Behaviour improving says Ofsted, but teachers beg to differ 

Number of schools being marked down on behaviour by Ofsted has plunged by more than half since Covid

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

Ofsted’s 11 grades will make judgments less reliable – experts

The inspectorate plans to use a five-point grading system to judge schools in nine key areas, plus early years...

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

Ofsted report cards verdict: Parents and school staff have their say

Polls suggest parents favour the proposed Ofsted model to the old one, while teachers and leaders oppose it

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

Just 6% of teachers ‘positive’ about Ofsted proposals, shows poll

Ofsted has launched a consultation on plans to reform its inspection framework and to assess schools using new 'report...

Lydia Chantler-Hicks

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

  1. I am a local authority inspector and advisor. I was part of the inquiry and the rest of the panel are all highly accomplished academics, researchers, school leaders and consultants. Our discussions were not completely critical of Ofsted and we were able to have very good discussions around the Ofsted model and other forms of accountability. We also discussed the need for inspection, especially in regard to unregistered schools, complaints around discrimination and concerns over safeguarding.

  2. Sandy Cameron

    “However, when asked by Schools Week, the inquiry – which was set up and is funded by the union – admitted the survey was self-selecting.”

    While ministers and Ofsted who want to retain inspection are NOT self-selecting?

    And “parents” (who allegedly want and need inspection)…has a random sample of the parent body been surveyed independently?

  3. Terry Pearson

    Claiming this piece of work is ‘dressed up as independent’ because it has been commissioned by the National Education Union (NEU) is disingenuous.

    Readers need to take particular note that the research WAS NOT carried out by the NEU. Professors Jane Perryman and Alice Bradbury do not work for the NEU, they are employed by UCL Institute of Education and are experienced in carrying out education research. It is not uncommon for organisations in education to ‘contract-out’ research activities in this way when the intention is to gain a more independent outcome than might be possible from ‘in-house’ produced material.

    A study which is undertaken by researchers who are independent from both the NEU and Ofsted therefore does not necessarily ‘muddy the waters’. On the contrary, it offers considerable potential to generate very useful information for helping Ofsted and the education sector improve.

    It is somewhat ironic too, in an article with a headline that alludes to the non-independence of the inquiry, statistics are quoted from Ofsted’s own post-inspection survey as a counter to the findings released early from the inquiry. We might be hard pressed to find a much clearer example of non-independent research than Ofsted’s post-inspection survey. It is designed, conducted, analysed and reported on by the inspectorate. It couldn’t be much further removed from an independent survey of the views of Ofsted inspections!

    Neither is it timely to claim that the UCL survey was poorly designed. At present we have no specific details of the design of the research material. Whilst seventy-nine per cent of the respondents may have identified as NEU members, that doesn’t automatically mean the results are not representative of the wider population of interest. If the views of NEU members and non-members are broadly in accordance then the findings are likely to be very important and very valuable.

    For sure the NEU has been open and clear about its view of Ofsted inspections and it has encouraged its members to take part in the survey. But then the inspectorate has also been forthcoming with its views of inspection. Not only does Ofsted make persuasive claims about the credibility of inspection findings and encourage inspection stakeholders to make use of the outputs from its ‘in-house’ research, it is also quick to dismiss outright numerous critiques of both these facets of its work even when they are evidence-informed.

    So, let’s not be too hasty in judging the worthiness of the UCL inquiry. At this stage it is all too easy to reject the initial headline findings because they don’t chime with our own view, don’t fit with Ofsted’s view or perhaps through fear of reprisal from the inspectorate. The full report has yet to be published, only then will we be able to evaluate the quality of the work. This may be the first time teachers, not leaders, as a collective have been able to make their views of inspection known in a public way. Surely we should be interested in what they had to say.