Academies, Ofsted

Academy trusts have limited impact on ‘stuck’ schools

Academisation no 'silver bullet' to save languishing schools, study suggests

Academisation no 'silver bullet' to save languishing schools, study suggests

Joining an academy trust has only a “small” positive impact on the fortunes of so-called “stuck” secondary schools, and none at all for languishing primary schools, new research suggests.

The findings raise doubts about the government’s plans to improve schools by moving them all into multi-academy trusts. Researchers warned academisation was “not a silver bullet”.

A new report from the Education Policy Institute and UCL Institute of Education found that schools persistently rated less than ‘good’ by Ofsted faced a “cycle of challenging circumstances” and limited improvement.

The plight of stuck schools was previously highlighted by Ofsted in 2018, when chief inspector Amanda Spielman warned there were hundreds of schools that had not been rated above ‘requires improvement’ or ‘inadequate’ for over a decade.

EPI and the IoE analysed the characteristics of schools rated less than ‘good’ over a minimum of three inspections between 2005 and 2018, comparing them to other schools and looking at the impact of changes to governance and leadership.

Report points to limited impact of academisation

Converting or moving schools with a double ‘requires-improvement’ grade is a key plank of the schools reforms set out in the government’s white paper in March. Schools with ‘inadequate’ ratings already face intervention.

But today’s report found joining a multi-academy trust showed only “small positive effects for secondary schools” when it came to their ability to secure a better grade at their next inspection.

However researchers said this may be caused by “inspection holidays” given to schools when they become sponsor-led academies, which would reduce the number of opportunities to be rated less than ‘good’.

Unlike for secondary schools, there were “no positive feedback effects of joining a MAT
for primary schools”, and even risks of greater pupil movement and teacher turnover.

The report warned the findings “show, yet again, that academisation is not a silver bullet to deliver school improvement and the government should consider these results to help inform its future policies around academisation and school improvement”.

Dr Mary Bousted, joint general secretary of the National Education Union, said the findings “demolish the government’s claim that joining a MAT will improve schools’ outcomes”. 

“Ministers must recognise that a change of a school’s governance is not the magic solution they claim it to be.”

However, the study found that at secondary level, joining a MAT “slightly” reduced teacher turnover.

Schools face uphill struggle after negative grade

The report also lays bare the struggles faced by “stuck” schools, which face greater instability, higher rates of poverty and more challenging locations.

Researchers found that after their initial negative Ofsted grade, the intake of a school “tends to become more disadvantaged and teacher turnover increases, both of which contribute to the difficulty in reversing the negative Ofsted judgement”.

“The longer the school continues to have the less than good rating, the harder the process of school improvement becomes.”

The report concluded that the DfE must consider whether there is “adequate support” for stuck schools, especially stuck secondary schools which receieve only “marginally higher” funding than other institutions.

Efforts to reduce “excessively high teacher turnover” are also needed, the report said.

Inspections ‘too frequent and inconsistent’

The report also found that inspections of case study schools were “were arguably too frequent, variable and inconsistent”. However, “many headteachers, teachers and governors” of all types of school valued the “role of Ofsted and other support received to improve”.

Geoff Barton, general secretary of the ASCL school leaders’ union, said the report “confirms that what is desperately needed to improve the fortunes of schools which are trapped in a cycle of negative Ofsted ratings is more support and less punishment”.

“Unfortunately, we have a system in which negative Ofsted ratings stigmatise schools, ruin careers and damage professional reputations.”

Ofsted should revise the cycles of full and monitoring inspections to give schools time to implement “improvements”, the report said.

The watchdog should avoid trainsforming monitoring into too frequent inspections and “over-surveillance”, address variation in the number of inspections and across inspectors, and should not provide “false hope” in monitoring visits.

The Department for Education was contacted for comment.

An Ofsted spokesperson said it had “highlighted that we need more joined-up support to improve education for children in these stuck schools, so they get the same opportunities as every other child”.

“We maintain that if schools focus on doing all the right things, such as improving behaviour and ensuring high standards of teaching, that they can become unstuck, and we will continue to work with the Department of Education to ensure we work as closely as possible to help support these schools.”

Latest education roles from

Procurement Officer

Procurement Officer

RNN Group

Director of Marketing and Student Recruitment

Director of Marketing and Student Recruitment

Barnet and Southgate College

Professional Practice (TLA) Lead

Professional Practice (TLA) Lead

RNN Group

Health & Care Coordinator

Health & Care Coordinator

MidKent College

HR Assistant

HR Assistant

MidKent College

Principal, Cedar Mount Academy Bright Futures Educational Trust

Principal, Cedar Mount Academy Bright Futures Educational Trust

Satis Education

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Navigating NPQ Funding Cuts: Discover Leader Apprenticeships with NPQs

Recent cuts to NPQ funding, as reported by Schools Week, mean 14,000 schools previously eligible for scholarships now face...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

How do you tackle the MIS dilemma?

With good planning, attention to detail, and clear communication, switching MIS can be a smooth and straightforward process, but...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

How can we prepare learners for their future in an ever-changing world?

By focusing their curriculums on transferable skills, digital skills, and sustainability, schools and colleges can be confident that learners...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Inspiring Education Leaders for 10 Years

The 10th Inspiring Leadership Conference is to be held on 13 and 14 June 2024 at the ICC in...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Academies

Academy transfer market cost £45m under Tories

More than 2,000 academies have been rebrokered since 2013

Schools Week Reporter
Academies

Academies: No MAT target, but mergers growing

Around one in five trusts which were running schools in 2019 are no longer in operation

Jack Dyson
Academies

Emergency capital cash handouts soar to £12m after funding squeeze

Funding for urgent work jumps 300% in 12 months, as experts warn figures are 'sign of the times'

Jack Dyson
Academies

Lack of MAT get-out clause sees strikes, petitions and open letters

Unrest at MATs shows allowing schools to leave trusts would create 'much healthier relationships', claims union rep, but how...

Jack Dyson

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. Anonymous

    I currently work in an oversubscribed secondary school with a good ofsted that has just joined a growing trust.

    This trust is currently causing more damage than good.