Schools

Academics want reform of ‘narrow’ phonics focus

Study claims teaching reading in England has been 'less successful' under new approach

Study claims teaching reading in England has been 'less successful' under new approach

Academics want “urgent reform” of how young pupils are taught to read, warning a “narrower focus” on phonics in the last decade has made English schools “less successful”.

A report from UCL found synthetic phonics – the practice of breaking words up into units of sound – has become the “dominant approach” in England after reforms introduced in 2012 by education secretary Michael Gove.

Schools previously favoured a “more balanced approach”, the report said, including the use of passages of words.

However the UCL study claimed that teaching reading in England “has been less successful” under the new approach. The conclusion was based on an analysis of 55 “robust” longitudinal experimental trials.

Researchers said their findings “do not support a synthetic phonics orientation to the teaching of reading: they suggest that a balanced instruction approach is most likely to be successful”.

DfE says phonics benefit ‘proven the world over’

But the Department for Education shot down the study, saying phonics teaching had been “proven the world-over to be the most effective method of teaching children to read”.

The Education Endowment Foundation rates phonics as having a “high” impact of five months of progress for “very low cost”, based on “very extensive evidence”.

The 2016 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) saw England rise from joint tenth to joint eighth place out of 50 countries for reading among ten-year-olds, its highest-ever ranking.

The government claimed at the time this showed its phonics reforms were working. In 2019, the former schools minister Nick Gibb said the debate over phonics was “over”.

But UCL academics said the trend in England’s PISA score – which had smaller gains that PIRLS – was a “more valid source” for the purpose of their research.

Professor Dominic Wyse, a co-author of the UCL paper, said England’s approach “requires a too heavy emphasis on teaching about phonemes (sounds), and so minimises attention to other vital aspects of teaching reading”.

The analysis of other studies found that phonics teaching was “likely to be effective” if it was “carefully connected” with reading actual books and taught for between 36 and 60 hours in a single school year.

The DfE said its guidance was “clear that phonics is just one part of becoming a fluent reader”. 

“As well as systematic phonics teaching, teachers should also focus on speaking and reading stories to foster a love of reading among children.”

Open letter calls for change to reading policy

More than 250 people have now called on the government to change its policy on reading, saying in an open letter that reforms should “centre on a wider range of approaches to teaching phonics and reading, enabling teachers to use their own judgement about which is best for their pupils”.

Of 634 nursery, reception and year 1 teachers surveyed as part of the research, 66 per cent said phonics was their main focus. This compared to just 1 per cent who said whole texts were seen as the “main emphasis and context” for teaching reading.

The use of synthetic phonics in schools is enforced by the government through the national curriculum, Ofsted inspections and the phonics screening check, which was introduced in 2012.

A survey of year 2 teachers found 43 per cent said the introduction of the screening check had an impact on their teaching to some extent, including reducing time spent on other literacy activities.

No return to the ‘bad old days’

Tom Bennett, the founder of ResearchEd, said it was “odd” to claim teachers only use phonics.

Evidence shows phonics “remains the single best way to introduce young people to reading”, he added, but warned there is “still a strong anti-evidence instinct in many educationalists, and some teachers who have been misinformed and let down by phonics denialists in their teacher training”.

The report “seems to encourage…a return to the bad old days of multi-cueing and other forms of guesswork”, said Bennett.

“Such approaches risk leaving children illiterate. Let’s not do that. Evidence matters, not dogma.”

Julie McCulloch, head of policy at the ASCL school leaders’ union, added while there was “clear evidence” phonics provided a “strong foundation” to help children learn to read, it was “important that this is combined with approaches which help children to appreciate stories and develop a love of reading”.

According to DfE data, the proportion of year 1 pupils meeting the expected standard in the phonics screening check rose from 58 per cent in 2012 to 82 per cent in 2019.

The research was funded by the Helen Hamlyn Centre for Pedagogy, which is based at UCL.



More from this theme

Schools

£200 grants to encourage small school staff to take NPQs

£22.6m set aside as free scholarships also opened up to private schools

James Carr
Schools

DfE hiring up to 8 more advisers to oversee attendance push

A handful of councils alone have slashed more attendance staff than the DfE plans to recruit

Tom Belger
Schools

Make schools ‘corporate parents’ for looked-after children, says review

Landmark MacAlister review warns the relationship between social care and education has become 'consistently fraught'

Freddie Whittaker
Schools

Details of schools’ £1.5m cost-cutting success story withheld

School board minutes suggest staff cuts were behind savings

James Carr
SATs, Schools

Markers locked out of Capita’s SATs webinar

The firm has apologised after teachers were left waiting for hours

Samantha Booth
Covid, Schools

Another procurement legal row emerges as DfE ‘under stress’

At least three major outsourcing contracts from the DfE have been at the centre of legal challenges

Samantha Booth

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

One comment

  1. Year 2 teacher.

    I find this quite compelling, I work in a school where there is a huge focus on the rigidity of RWI phonics and recently, we got 83% despite working in a deprived area and these children having missed nearly 9 months of education, which was a good result.

    However, my class hate phonics now. They were so drilled with it and let’s face it, RWI is not exciting stuff. We have no time to simply allow them to read books and enjoy them. I’ve worked in other schools where the approach to phonics was very different and while I think that we must be careful to teach to evidenced content, that school (admittedly a slightly different demographic) always achieved around 90% in the screening check.