Schools white paper

White paper: All rhetoric and no solutions

All the ambitious vocabulary in the world couldn't hide this document's failure to grasp the real problems facing schools, writes Mary Bousted

All the ambitious vocabulary in the world couldn't hide this document's failure to grasp the real problems facing schools, writes Mary Bousted

28 Mar 2022, 18:00



The schools white paper is full of noble aims couched in superlatives. The curriculum it advocates is described as ‘strong, broad, ambitious, academic and knowledge-rich’. The lessons to teach this curriculum will be ‘brilliant’. Teaching will be ‘attractive’ and ‘high-status’.

Unfortunately, it takes more than a succession of adjectives to turn objectives into outcomes. And it is here that the government utterly fails to convince.  

The white paper rightly recognises that the quality of teaching is the most important in-school factor in improving outcomes for children, especially for those from disadvantaged backgrounds. So it would seem to be sensible, would it not, for the government to acknowledge two obvious facts which directly impact on teacher supply and render it inadequate?

The first is that the government fails, year on year, to recruit enough teachers. That’s particularly true for traditional ‘shortage subjects’ – but this year it also applies to subjects like English which usually recruit strongly.

And the second is that the profession is haemorrhaging teachers. Within ten years of qualification over 40 per cent of teachers leave teaching. The key cause cited by those who leave is excessive workload caused by accountability pressures. 

Yet the white paper shamefully attempts to downplay the scale and severity of the teacher workload problem with the caveat ‘where this still exists’, as though teacher exhaustion and stress are not now endemic across schools and throughout the profession. If there is any doubt that this is the case, I refer you to the Independent British Skills and Employment Survey, done every five years since 1992; Its latest study concludes that no other large occupation has shown anything like the degree of work intensification teaching has. In 2017, 85 per cent of teachers reported that they came home from work exhausted – more than double all other professionals put together.

The white paper’s proposed solution of a staff wellbeing charter to tackle excessive workload ‘where it still exists’ is an insult. It is completely inadequate to the scale of the problem and will do little, if anything, to address the stress and burnout created by the combination of a toxic accountability system intensified by the pressures the Covid pandemic.

The rhetoric is matched by shameless misinformation

Disadvantaged children suffer the most harm when there are not enough teachers. But the white paper does not even acknowledge the root cause of inadequate teacher supply – and without this its policy proposals for ‘levelling up’ will not succeed.

The main thrust of the white paper is towards the academisation of all schools by 2030. Here, the rhetoric is matched by shameless misinformation disguised by statistical sleights of hand which should have no place in any serious piece of government policy making.  The emphasis throughout is on ‘strong’ multi-academy trusts which are characterised by sharing of evidence-based approaches, quality professional development, robust financial governance and economies of scale.

In particular, it makes the claim that if all schools achieved the performance of the strongest MATs (those ‘performing at the 90th percentile’), then “national performance at key stage 2 would be 14 percentage points higher and 19 percentage points higher for disadvantaged pupils’.

Sounds good, doesn’t it? Until you stop to consider that the dramatic improvements described above are predicated on all MATs also performing as well as the top 10 per cent. The reality, that 90 per cent of MATs do not meet the standards of the top 10 per cent is obfuscated by an entirely contrived comparison between MATs and others.  So let’s turn the argument on its head: If all children did as badly as pupils in a trust performing in the bottom 90th percentile, national performance at key stage 2 would be 15 percentage points lower and 18 percentage points lower for disadvantaged pupils.

Put that way, the claim is much less impressive, isn’t it?

In its attempt to complete the education revolution of 2010, the white paper ignores and downplays the pressing problems besetting our schools in 2022. It is a wasted opportunity, and the policy at its heart looks more and more like the answer to a question nobody ever asked.



More from this theme

Schools white paper

Council-run academy trusts get the green light in schools white paper

DfE also to set out new maths and English target for secondary schools

Freddie Whittaker
Schools white paper

Schools ‘asked to offer’ 32.5-hour week by 2023 – and Ofsted will check

Expectation is equivalent to a six and a half hour day, which most schools already provide

Freddie Whittaker
Schools white paper

The schools resisting ministers’ all-academy land ambitions

Schools Week looks at the areas that have thwarted ministers’ decade-long academisation drive

Tom Belger
Schools white paper

Government to set 2030 target for all schools to become academies

But white paper is likely to kick decision on forced academisation down the road

Freddie Whittaker
Schools white paper

Free school charity: All-MAT sector would mean ‘death’ of innovation

Ministers' favoured institutions won't be replicated if white paper scraps standalone academies, charity warns

Freddie Whittaker
Schools white paper

DfE considers council-run MATs to achieve academy ambition

Ministers 'open to slightly different models of partnership' as schools white paper looms

Freddie Whittaker

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

5 Comments

  1. Mr Positivity

    My wife and I are both exhausted teachers. We work with exhausted colleagues (and pupils). We’re both very positive people, running out of positivity. This article brings tears to my eyes. It’s a relief that someone notices and offers the alternative view of this whitewash and the constant obsession with academies/structures. I only hope that there is an alternative political direction that has a stronger voice to help re-energise us all. I’ll remain positive, just.

  2. David Crompton

    A complete waste of breath. These people have no idea of what goes on in a school, let alone on a classroom.
    I think the government’s reluctance to actually ask what the people in the classroom think says it all.
    Don’t askdquestions you don’t want to hear the answers to.

  3. Privatisation of schools is one of the hidden priorities of this government, who will sell out to the highest bidders, namely corporate MAT’S. Sharing of teaching knowledge & skills, admin,HR, legal, payroll, H&S and more was done very effectively and efficiently by LEA. Now each school spends large part of budget on these and government spins this to say schools have more money. Its another con from the Conservatives, but much of the general public can’t see it atm.

  4. KIM COWIE

    I completely agree, the White Paper ignores the realities of teaching and simply regurgitates platitudes. After 40+ years in teaching, the latter 6 in teacher education I can confirm that the profession is exhausted, robbed of its dependence and reduced to attempting to mitigate against the reductionist ideology of Tory education non-policy. Unfortunately teacher education is now going the same way. While private schools look to innovate the state sector has been relegated to the 1950’s or earlier. A dismal state of affairs.