Schools

Teacher pay rise proposals will ‘exacerbate supply challenges’

The NFER backs higher pay rises, bursaries and bonuses - but secondary teachers should get higher awards than primary ones

The NFER backs higher pay rises, bursaries and bonuses - but secondary teachers should get higher awards than primary ones

23 Jun 2022, 0:00

More from this author

The government’s plans to hand teachers lower pay rises than the average UK worker are likely to “exacerbate” already-growing recruitment and retention problems, according to experts.

A study by the National Foundation for Educational Research found the Department for Education is likely to significantly miss initial teacher training recruitment targets in shortage subjects over the next four years.

The think tank is urging the DfE to revise up its proposed teacher pay awards, hike bursaries to as much as £30,000, hand more staff retention bonuses and offer secondary teachers higher rises than their primary peers.

The warning comes in spite of the Conservatives’ manifesto pledge to boost starting salaries to £30,000, and a recently announced “levelling up premium” for certain subjects and areas.

The report is likely to heap further pressure on government as unions threaten strike action if awards don’t at least match inflation – now running at 9.1 per cent.

DfE warned over recruitment targets

The sector is expected to recruit just 18 per cent of aimed-for physics trainees, 39 per cent of computing trainees and 82 per cent of chemistry teachers in 2023-24, though maths is expected to be 10 per cent above target.

Researchers said their analysis corroborated the significance of teacher pay and the strength of the wider labour market for recruitment. A one per cent rise in teachers’ starting salaries, assuming no change to other graduate starting salaries, can boost ITT applications by two percent, they found.

The study suggests the government’s 8.9 per cent hike to teacher starting salaries next year and retention bonus plans would have yielded a “steady improvement” in supply under the economic forecasts at the time policies were developed.

But they say official forecasts for average UK employment and pay have improved since last October. “The latest forecasts have a negative impact on predicted teacher supply, as a healthier employment market outside of teaching means greater competitiveness.”

It says this also makes teacher pay less competitive, with a “negative impact” on retention. Overall this means “the DfE pay proposals are likely to lead to very little improvement in recruitment against targets over time”.

Report co-author Jack Worth said they were “only likely to exacerbate the teacher supply challenges” re-emerging as a Covid boost now fades.

New London teachers are also set to receive lower rises to starting salaries than elsewhere, up 3.7.per cent in 2023/24 versus 7.1 per cent in the rest of England, which “may have implications for recruitment and retention”.

But hiking new teachers’ pay more than other staff will boost supply more than a uniform pay award, despite calls from the National Education Union for an “undifferentiated” rise.

Plea to hike secondary pay more than primary

The research, commissioned by the Gatsby Foundation, also found “little compelling evidence” early career payments and phased bursaries help recruitment, though past studies have found they boost retention.

While researchers said specific bursaries and early career payments had provided “some” remedy recently to recruitment and retention woes, the bursaries have “not been enough” to ensure sufficient supply. They note science, technology, engineering and maths graduates have “relatively attractive” alternative career options.

Recommendations include a pay hike more than currrently proposed by the DfE as the labour market is “stronger than was thought when DfE pay proposals were developed”. This should be “affordable for schools”.

DfE proposals are estimated at a 3.9 per cent rise for the average teacher, versus average UK pay rises of 5.3 per cent, the NFER said.

Another is hiking maximum shortage subject bursaries from £24,000 to £30,000, and expanding the “levelling up premium” retention payment to shortage subject teachers across England. Currently 42 per cent of secondaries are ineligible for any premium, with disadvantaged areas prioritised.

A further proposal is separating primary and secondary payscales from 2024-25 to set lower rises for primary staff, where recruitment is stronger and pupil numbers falling. In Finland secondary staff salaries are 15 per cent higher, but the NFER acknowledges this could be “complex” and pose “fairness issues”.

A Department for Education spokesperson called teachers the “backbone of our education system”, with new teachers in line for the “highest pay awards in a generation”.

Rises for all teachers, the levelling up premium and fully-funded training opportunities make teaching an “attractive career”, and teacher numbers are up by 24,000 on 2010, they added.



More from this theme

Schools

Government withholds SEND bailouts as councils told to fill £269m hole

Some DfE bailout payments were delayed as councils failed to hit agreed targets, while all councils are being told...

Tom Belger
Schools

£82m scheme helps to deliver fast broadband to rural primaries

Government says thousands of schools will benefit from joint DCMS-DfE investment

Samantha Booth
Schools

Ofsted warns new ‘coasting schools’ powers could fuel ‘quick fixes’

DfE will plough on with ordering more schools to academise or join new trusts, despite fears reforms will hit...

Tom Belger
Schools

1 in 3 teachers says year 9s don’t get regular music lessons

Poll also shows 2 in 5 primary pupils lack access to free instrument teaching as DfE sets out new...

Tom Belger
Schools

DfE adviser calls for dozens of attendance hubs

Trust CEO Rob Tarn wants DfE funding so other schools can follow North Shore Academy's lead in launching attendance...

Tom Belger
Schools

DfE looking for £100k school reforms policy adviser 

Candidates need 'strong understanding' of school sector

Schools Week Reporter

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

One comment

  1. Ben James

    Upside down. The newbies *are* hard to get. Nothing new there. But what is new is the risk of losing the loyal Covid-surviving “Oldies”. What are the risks if that does happen?

    The “Oldies” are, actually, not *that* old; they just hit UPS or leadership spine and maybe had children. And so they have a child or two’s worth of inflation-affected-costs (or a baby’s-worth) on the way to supplement their own [assuming the DofE has not implemented a new rule banning teachers from raising their own children (as if each teacher were a Catholic priest)?].

    Oldies know what they are doing. And they too got a top degree from a Russell Group University: that’s not just the preserve of the much sought-after new recruits!

    And Australia is offering Oldies an MPS1-equivalent starting salary higher than UPS1. The USA? Similar, in places (the dollar is strong). *If* Oldies are wanting to “start over” .

    And that’s just the *teaching* jobs the Oldies might be weighing up.

    Morality aside (and, let’s be honest, there *are* ethical questions around handing 23 year olds 9% pay-rises ahead of 3% for older staff members with children to raise… let alone older staff members who were also in schools, pre-vaccination, facing unknown risks in the summer of 2020 and at other times when many others, including undergraduates, were safely in Lockdown)… morality aside, the economics of hiring an experienced teacher for the private sector are attractive. I mean it was always teach *first* wasn’t it? So, what next? And how soon? And how many staff attracted to it?

    If all the older teachers did leave (as Toby Young once suggested might be beneficial)… has anyone considered the implications for culture? None? Lord of the Flies? The Sparticle Mysteries? Certainly, the more Oldies that do go, the more Newbies that are needed!

    Ultimately, after ten+ years of sub-inflation movement on UPS, TLRs and Leadership rate, perhaps the DofE might wish to consider that old tale of the Pied Piper of Hamlyn… if not “Breaking Bad” …

    But, no, that’s too much! That’s the kind of argument Finance Directors and auditors and accountants use to justify vast pay packets: pay us more or we might be bribe-able… to work elsewhere (or otherwise).

    Teachers are not “in it for the money” ; they have outstanding morality and ethics. But… they are guided from above too… and need to live… and… Let’s be honest… they need to be able to fund enough of a life to be able to educate others about life (try a geography teacher unable to afford to travel!).

    Upside down. There are vast numbers of MPS teachers and far fewer on UPS and above. Maybe it’s time to respect our elders again when it comes to pay rises. How was it, again, that the French do it…?