SEND

SEND delays ‘making children vulnerable’ to violence – report

Inspectorates, including Ofsted, warn delays in assessing SEND needs are 'putting children at greater risk of harm'

Inspectorates, including Ofsted, warn delays in assessing SEND needs are 'putting children at greater risk of harm'

Delays in assessing SEND needs and issuing education, health and care plans “is making children more vulnerable” to serious youth violence and putting them at greater risk of harm, inspectors have warned. 

A group of inspectorates including Ofsted warned there was evidence of a link between “SEND and an increased risk of exploitation” and violence.

Children wait “too long” for needs to be assessed, then face delays in access to support services and variation in the quality and timeliness of EHCPs.

A new report on agencies’ responses to serious youth violence said these factors were “making children more vulnerable”, because “problems can escalate while they wait for an assessment or support”. 

Delays in assessing needs “are putting these children at greater risk of harm”. 

Of the 36 children whose experiences they tracked in detail, 16 had a diagnosis of a disability and/or an EHCP. A further 15 had additional needs identified and were waiting for an assessment. 

In three of the areas visited by inspectors, children had to wait at least two years for a neurodevelopmental assessment, such as autism or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

But in one area children had to wait a “shocking” 10 years for a service – by which time they would be adults.

A failure to identify and address a child’s SEND needs is “highly likely” to limit their ability to “engage in and benefit from education”, the report added.

“Many of the children we reviewed who were out of education, or excluded, were awaiting these assessments. Being out of full-time education further increases a child’s risk of being affected by serious youth violence.”

National approach needed

Inspectors were also concerned about waiting times for speech and language assessments, because if professionals are not clear on the best way to communicate with youngsters “this may reduce their ability to engage with and help children who are being harmed”. 

While some areas have introduced measures to try to reduce waiting times, these can “realistically only be addressed at a national level if harm to children is to be reduced”. 

The watchdogs said a “holistic response” was needed for youngsters affected by youth violence, as “in too many cases, professionals did not focus sufficiently on all aspects of children’s needs”.

In one case, they had “adultified” a “highly vulnerable child with SEND” who was criminalised “as a result of a failure to assess his special educational needs and to address and understand that he was a victim of exploitation”.

In another, professionals carrying out reviews to support children did not consider the EHCPs of those on child protection plans or looked after. 

“This meant that children’s holistic needs were not being addressed, even though we know that education is a protective factor against exploitation and violence.”

The watchdogs said the government and local agencies “must prioritise” the needs of children who are disproportionately at risk of harm from serious youth violence, such as those with SEND.

It was “clear” from inspections that “much more is needed” at a national and local level to better understand and address the factors that make some youngsters at “disproportionate risk” of harm from violence. 

School ‘is key element’ to protect kids

The inspectorates said when education representatives were at strategic meetings and “fully engaged” in developing a multi-agency appacoh, they saw it “made a real difference for children”. 

“Children received better, more coordinated responses to their needs when education was seen as a protective factor. Education was clearly recognised and prioritised in some, but not all, areas as an essential element in approaches to prevent and minimise the risk of serious youth violence.”

Training for staff was “essential” to help them better understand the issue and child criminal exploitation. 

Where a child is excluded, “coordinated multi-agency work” to reintegrate them into mainstream education “needs to be seen as a priority by all professionals”. 

But in areas where school staff did not have the training, children who were excluded and at risk of serious violence remained in alternative provision for “too long”. 

“There was no planning to help them transition into further education or apprenticeships. This meant that educational opportunities for these children were not prioritised, leaving some of them at further risk.”

The inspectors concluded that keeping children in education “is a key element of a protective approach” to serious youth violence. 

The inspectorates included Ofsted, the Care Quality Commission, HMI of Constabulary, Fire and Rescue Services and HMI Probation.

They carried out joint targeted area inspections in Leeds, Coventry, Somerset, Manchester, Merton and Lancashire between September 2023 and May this year.

Latest education roles from

IT Technician

IT Technician

Harris Academy Morden

Teacher of Geography

Teacher of Geography

Harris Academy Orpington

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Exams Assistant

Exams Assistant

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Solihull College and University Centre

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Inspiring Leadership Conference 2025: Invaluable Insights, Professional Learning Opportunities & A Supportive Community

This June, the Inspiring Leadership Conference enters its eleventh year and to mark the occasion the conference not only...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Catch Up® Literacy and Catch Up® Numeracy are evidence-based interventions which are highly adaptable to meet the specific needs of SEND / ALN learners

Catch Up® is a not-for-profit charity working to address literacy and numeracy difficulties that contribute to underachievement. They offer...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

It’s Education’s Time to Shine: Celebrate your Education Community in 2025!

The deadline is approaching to nominate a colleague, team, whole school or college for the 2025 Pearson National Teaching...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Navigating NPQ Funding Cuts: An Apprenticeship Success Story

Last year’s NPQ funding cuts meant that half of England’s teachers faced costs of up to £4,000 to complete...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

SEND

How to solve SEND? 13 sector solutions…

The education committee received an 'unprecedented' number of responses to its SEND inquiry. Here's what we learned from it...

John Dickens
SEND

‘I’d like to see SEND label retired’, says inclusion tsar Tom Rees

DfE inclusion adviser also spoke of problems with the current 'medicalised model' of special educational needs support

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
SEND

ASCL head: Leaders turning away SEND kids need ‘calling out’

While wider reform is needed, leaders must create a 'culture that is more inclusive and more open', says union...

Freddie Whittaker
SEND

Cheaper to pay fines than provide SEND support

Councils pay families thousands of pounds for failure to provide support stipulated in EHCPs

Rosa Furneaux

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *