Schools

Private school body takes legal action against government on VAT

The Independent Schools Council said the decision 'has not been taken lightly' but it is 'defending the rights of families who have chosen independent education'

The Independent Schools Council said the decision 'has not been taken lightly' but it is 'defending the rights of families who have chosen independent education'

A body representing private schools is launching legal action against the government’s decision to levy VAT on their fees.

Julie Robinson, chief executive of the Independent Schools Council, said the decision “has not been taken lightly and has been under consideration for many months”.

Julie Robinson
Robinson

At yesterday’s budget, chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed plans to go ahead with the introduction of VAT on private school fees from January 2025. 

The ISC, an umbrella body for seven associations representing such schools, said its case would centre around alleged breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and Human Rights Act 1998.

Robinson said: “At all points throughout this debate, our focus has been on the children in our schools who would be negatively impacted by this policy. 

“This focus remains and we will be defending the rights of families who have chosen independent education, but who may no longer be able to do so as a direct result of an unprecedented education tax.” 

State schools expected to take 35k more pupils

A government response to its own technical consultation on the proposals estimated that in the long-term, 37,000 pupils will leave or never enter the UK private school sector as a result of the VAT policy. This is around six per cent of the current private school population. 

Government predicts that 35,000 pupils will move into UK state schools “in the long term steady state” following the VAT policy taking effect in January.

The number expected to move before the end of the 2024-25 academic year “is around 3,000”.

Councils funding placements in these schools for pupils with SEND will be compensated for the VAT they are charged. 

The ISC said it would work with human rights barrister Lord David Pannick, Paul Luckhurst from Blackstone Chambers and legal firm Kingsley Napley.

It will be pursuing the case in the High Court, with a pre-action letter to be issued to the government shortly.

It is separate to other litigation by other organisations, but the ISC said it would be “liaising with these other third-party groups”. 

The Department for Education has been approached for comment.

Latest education roles from

IT Technician

IT Technician

Harris Academy Morden

Teacher of Geography

Teacher of Geography

Harris Academy Orpington

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Exams Assistant

Exams Assistant

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Solihull College and University Centre

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

It’s Education’s Time to Shine: Celebrate your Education Community in 2025!

The deadline is approaching to nominate a colleague, team, whole school or college for the 2025 Pearson National Teaching...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Navigating NPQ Funding Cuts: An Apprenticeship Success Story

Last year’s NPQ funding cuts meant that half of England’s teachers faced costs of up to £4,000 to complete...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Embedding Formative Assessment: not just a box-ticking exercise but something long-term and meaningful for all

Our EFA programme has been proven to help schools achieve better GCSE results, as evidenced by the EEF. Find...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Building capacity in family support to tackle low school attendance 

Persistent and severe school absence impacts children, families, and communities—especially in disadvantaged areas. School-Home Support’s Attendance Support and Development Programme...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Schools

Free school gets £500k government bailout after wage increase

Private school-turned-academy hit with budget problems after increasing support staff pay to national rates

Jack Dyson
Schools

Coroner concern over school swimming lessons after boy’s death

Coroner warns some primaries are not providing swimming lessons despite it being curriculum requirement

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Schools

Cease and desist: Trust supports staff to sue online trolls

Provision for staff sickness cover will be broadened to cover defamation

Jack Dyson
Schools

Head scores victory as Google agrees to delete school reviews

Tech giant says all school reviews will now be deleted because of ‘consistent off-topic and harmful’ comments

Rhi Storer

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 Comments

  1. MR ROBIN BATE

    Let’s hope this wins. The fall out for ALL schools and ALL children will be huge, if not. The government can not discriminate against a 7% minority based on educational choice because of blind ideology. Ignorance of how this will effect lower income families on bursaries, children with SEND, and other children who will be removed from their schools mid-year because of the rush to implement this so as not to witness the impact. Yet, they reduce tax on alcohol, give a huge lead in time for tax on tapes and don’t even consider taxing gambling. And this is the best way to fund improvements to education? By forcing children to take up places they are already subsidising but not using?

    • Not all independent school parents are rolling in money, and most schools are not wealthy institutions charging 40K+ per year. Some families make financial sacrifices to educate their children privately: limited holiday opportunites, no second car, children have to save up and buy their own phones and electronic items (contrary to popular belief), clothes (in and out of school) are second hand rather than new.

      Remember, all the parents choosing private schooling are already paying for a mainstream school place that they are not using, through their normal taxes , which means there should currently be more money available for pupils of maintained schools. The estimated 35,000 pupils are going to arrive in schools and need teachers and classrooms and other resources, but the money for additional pupils from the government/Local Authority does not arrive in school budgets until around 18 months later. Who’s going to pay for it all in the short term? Or do all children in maintained schools end up penalised because of a populist, blinkered decision by the government?

  2. All parents of children currently schooled in the private sector should apply for a state school place. It will wreck havoc and if nothing else may cause the government to hit the pause button and hopefully see some sense.