Ofsted

Ofsted school report cards: The 11 key proposals

From 'exemplary' to ditched deep dives: everything schools need to know about Ofsted's big inspection shake-up

From 'exemplary' to ditched deep dives: everything schools need to know about Ofsted's big inspection shake-up

Ofsted has today set out how its proposed new inspection model and school report cards will work.

A consultation on the proposals will run until April 28, with findings reported in the summer.

The return of inspections after the summer break will then be delayed until November to allow enough time to implement the changes, Ofsted said.

You can read our news story on the changes here, and a Q&A with Ofsted boss Sir Martyn Oliver here.

Here’s your usual handy Schools Week explainer…

1. Report cards to judge schools on 9 areas…

Report cards will judge schools on eight areas, plus safeguarding. Early years and sixth forms will also have their own categories – meaning a school could have 11 ratings in total.

Ofsted said these areas “represent the component parts of great education provision” and “provide the nuance” parents and professionals want.

They will allow inspectors to “highlight poor practice with more precision – pointing laser-like to specific issues, not shining a floodlight on the whole provider”.

Each evaluation area will have a drop-down box that contains more information about the findings.

The inspection areas for schools (state and independent) are:

  • Leadership and governance
  • Curriculum
  • Developing teaching
  • Achievement
  • Behaviour and attitudes
  • Attendance
  • Personal development and well-being
  • Inclusion
  • Safeguarding
  • Early years in schools (where applicable)
  • Sixth form in schools (where applicable)

For initial teacher training, there will be six:

  • Leadership
  • Inclusion
  • Curriculum
  • Teaching
  • Achievement
  • Professional behaviours, personal development and well-being

2. … 5 traffic-light ratings from ‘causing concern’ to ‘exemplary’

Each of the new areas will be rated using a five-point, traffic light system.

Ofsted said this will allow inspectors to “validate and celebrate success”, give reassurance where leaders are showing the “first signs of improvement”, and “identify where leaders’ attention needs to turn next to avoid outcomes declining”.

The five ratings will be:

  • Causing concern (red): needs urgent action to provide a suitable standard of education for children and learners
  • Attention needed (amber): some aspects of provision are inconsistent, limited in scope or impact and/or not fully meeting legal requirements or non-statutory guidance expectations. However, inspectors think leaders “have the capacity to make necessary improvements”
  • Secure (light green): offering a “secure standard of education” by meeting the above standards
  • Strong (green): practice is “consistently secure across different year groups and subjects”. Leaders “working above and beyond” what’s expected
  • Exemplary (dark green): all evaluation areas are graded at least secure and, in an area that is “consistently strong”, there is “a feature of practice that could be considered as exemplary”

Ofsted said the middle three grades would “typically capture where most providers would sit across the range of evaluation areas”.

Ofsted does provide a brief summary of other grading options. But they say a three-point scale wouldn’t support continuous improvement, four ratings wouldn’t allow them to “break down” ‘good’ into “more parts, and a 7-point scale was “unnecessarily complicated”.

Here is an example of what a new report card inspection will look like …

3. Inspectors ‘recommend’ exemplary – national panel decides

Inspectors can only recommend a school gets an exemplary rating. This will then be “moderated and confirmed” by a “national quality and consistency panel”.

Consideration will include how the school’s work is embedded and sustained over time, whether it is making a “tangible difference” to children’s learning and is being shared with others to “support system improvement”.

Any schools with ‘exemplary’ will be invited to submit a case study to be published on the Ofsted Academy website, potentially through a series of “national best practice reports”.

Oliver said the new top grade will “help raise standards, identifying world-class practice that should be shared with the rest of the country”.

4. Bye bye ungraded inspections

From November, all inspections will be ‘full’ inspections. There will be no more ungraded inspections.

This will “simplify inspection: every school will know exactly what kind of inspection it will receive and how often”, Ofsted said.

An evaluation of the current inspection framework, published by Ofsted on Monday, found inspectors were “less confident” in their evidence base for the areas of focus on ungraded inspections.

Currently most schools get full inspections roughly every four years. Ofsted has not said at what frequency they will happen under the new framework.

5. One red and schools will be put in a category…

The definition for schools that fall into categories of concern is set out in law:

  • Schools with widespread issues: ‘special measures’
  • Schools with more specific (but still serious) issues: ‘serious weaknesses’

This will remain, but the lesser category will be renamed to ‘requires significant improvement’. This will prevent confusion, Ofsted said.

Schools will be be deemed to require significant improvement if

  • They get a red ‘causing concern’ rating (or safeguarding ‘not met’) in any area, but not in leadership
  • They get a red rating for leadership but no other red grades and are meeting safeguarding requirements

Schools will be deemed to be in special measures if…

  • They have a red rating in leadership and at least one other area (or safeguarding ‘not met’)

6. … one amber and it’s a monitoring inspection within 18 months

All schools that are either causing concern, or have *any* area graded ‘attention needed’ (amber), will get a monitoring inspection within 18 months.

Monitoring visits to the latter will focus on just the ‘attention needed’ areas. If schools show “significant signs of improvement”, the area will be upgraded to ‘secure’. Monitoring will continue until all areas are secure.

Ofsted said this will mean schools with a lower rating aren’t waiting years for another inspection to show they’ve improved.

Schools deemed as ‘requires significant improvement’ will get five monitoring inspections within 18 months.

Schools in special measures will get six monitoring inspections within 24 months.

Government has also published its own intervention plans today.

7. Ofsted to publish number of SEND kids, absence data

Ofsted said it also wants to “take into account the context that a provider operates in”, which was “a strong theme in the Big Listen”.

They plan to “summarise” information on schools and the local area alongside the report card. This includes:

  • Characteristics of children: including those who are disadvantaged and those with SEND
  • Outcomes: performance data for all children and for particular groups, including those who are disadvantaged. They will highlight trends in performance data
  • Absence and attendance: including those with persistent absence
  • Local area data: including deprivation and relevant characteristics of the local community, availability and quality of other educational and care provision in the area, as well as any provision/services a child or learner may move onto next

8. Toolkits mean schools ‘won’t have to guess what’s in inspector’s minds’

Ofsted will publish toolkits for each evaluation area to “take any mystery out of inspection, so providers can be clear about what we will and, importantly, will not look at”.

Oliver described this as “unprecedented” and meant leaders would “no longer have to guess what’s in inspectors’ minds”.

They will “contain the standards” Ofsted will inspect against and “describe the quality they would expect to see at each point on the scale”.

Conversations will start with leaders’ “own evaluation of how their provision is doing”, based on the toolkits, published data and professional standards.

9. Nominated staff member to work with inspectors

All inspections will start by discussing a school’s work against the ‘secure’ criteria. To decide grades, inspectors will focus on leadership of the area and the extent of inclusive practices.

If secure is met, inspectors will consider higher grades. If not, they’ll look at the lower grades.

If the emerging grade is “at odds” with leaders’ views, inspectors will ask leaders to “suggest who else they should speak to and what other evidence they could consider” to make sure they’ve got broad enough evidence.

“Professional dialogue between inspectors and leaders will be a priority,” Ofsted added.

Every school will also be asked to nominate a senior staff member to “work closely with the inspection team”.

This will make sure leaders are “fully included in the inspection process”. Such nominees are already used in further education inspections.

10. How new inclusion focus will work

The toolkits also show how Ofsted plans to hold schools to account for providing inclusive education.

Inclusion, along with leadership, will feature as a key question across all evaluation areas, for all remits.

Inclusion is defined as:

Inclusive providers are at the heart of their communities. They have high expectations and aspirations for every child and learner. They are particularly alert to the needs of those who need the most support to achieve well, including those with SEND.

Leaders set a clear and ambitious vision for inclusion at the provider. They communicate this to children, learners, staff, and parents and carers. They create a culture in which every child and learner belongs, and feels safe, welcomed and valued. They make sure that all children and learners access a high-quality education, taught by experts with high ambition who strive to develop every child and learner’s potential.

Leaders work in a close and effective partnership with parents and carers and other agencies to secure the best possible outcomes for every child and learner, regardless of their starting points. Inclusive providers are relentless in identifying and removing barriers to participation and learning, so that all children and learners can achieve and thrive.

11. Curriculum deep dives gone, more focus on results

Inspectors will no longer do deep dives. Ofsted said inspectors “had challenges in gathering evidence” through this process – which delved into the curriculum of specific subjects – because of “time limitations”.

The evaluation of the current framework found deep dives were “more challenging” in small schools.

Removing deep dives will “give inspectors and providers significantly greater flexibility”. Inspectors will instead discuss the “most appropriate activities tailored to the specific provider”, normally based on “leaders’ improvement priorities”.

Report cards will “place more emphasis on children and learners’ outcomes,” Ofsted said.

“This does not mean exam results alone. It means looking at whether children and learners achieve well at every stage of their learning journey, so that they can move confidently and smoothly into the next phase of education or training – or into employment.”

Latest education roles from

IT Technician

IT Technician

Harris Academy Morden

Teacher of Geography

Teacher of Geography

Harris Academy Orpington

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Exams Assistant

Exams Assistant

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Solihull College and University Centre

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

It’s Education’s Time to Shine: Celebrate your Education Community in 2025!

The deadline is approaching to nominate a colleague, team, whole school or college for the 2025 Pearson National Teaching...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Navigating NPQ Funding Cuts: An Apprenticeship Success Story

Last year’s NPQ funding cuts meant that half of England’s teachers faced costs of up to £4,000 to complete...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Embedding Formative Assessment: not just a box-ticking exercise but something long-term and meaningful for all

Our EFA programme has been proven to help schools achieve better GCSE results, as evidenced by the EEF. Find...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Building capacity in family support to tackle low school attendance 

Persistent and severe school absence impacts children, families, and communities—especially in disadvantaged areas. School-Home Support’s Attendance Support and Development Programme...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Ofsted

Ofsted’s 11 grades will make judgments less reliable – experts

The inspectorate plans to use a five-point grading system to judge schools in nine key areas, plus early years...

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

Ofsted report cards verdict: Parents and school staff have their say

Polls suggest parents favour the proposed Ofsted model to the old one, while teachers and leaders oppose it

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

Just 6% of teachers ‘positive’ about Ofsted proposals, shows poll

Ofsted has launched a consultation on plans to reform its inspection framework and to assess schools using new 'report...

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

Ofsted quiz: Can you spot a ‘strong’ rating from a ‘secure’ one?

Ofsted plans to publish 'toolkits' to explain how the five new grades will be awarded in proposed report cards...

Schools Week Reporter

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 Comments

  1. Ross McGill

    A single day is not enough to assess all the proposed areas fairly. How on Earth will any inspection team evaluate all these areas across one inspection day? Doing fewer things in greater depth has to be the way to go.

    Meanwhile, over in Wales…

  2. There have been many inspection frameworks published and implemented by Ofsted since its inception in 1992. Inspections conducted under the variety of frameworks have reported using a wide range of means and grading systems. Each version has been lauded by its’ respective Chief Inspector. Each framework and reporting system has, in turn, been replaced by the next, often very radically changed, iteration, due to the increasingly obvious failings of the then current inspection regime.

    The 2025 proposals, if adopted, will be no different. They are already declared to be better than the last, to be fit for purpose for parents, the profession and government. It is unlikely they will be in force for any longer than the previous rafts of such measures.

    The realisation that accurately grading such complex organisations as schools within the confines of available resource is an unachievable aim. Ofsted is tasked with judging the efficacy of schools based on evidence, the large majority of which is subjective, gathered by very small teams of inspectors in less than 16 working hours for each inspection. This has never and cannot ever be achieved.

    Accountability should be a clear feature of any good system, but it does not have to be one with graded judgements. It is grading which turns nuanced reporting into crude judgements, bringing with it disproportionately high stakes to the process and ramping up the pressure on those to be inspected.