SEND

Firm given ‘value for SEND’ contract slashed council care plans

Concern £1.5m government scheme is 'simply cost-cutting exercise'

Concern £1.5m government scheme is 'simply cost-cutting exercise'

Exclusive

A consultancy firm that saved a council millions of pounds by overseeing a “significant reduction” in new care plans for children will lead the government’s SEND spending value-for-money drive.

Impower Consulting Ltd has won the £1.5 million Department for Education ‘Delivering Better Value in SEND’ contract. It will find “underlying drivers” of “high spend and poor outcomes” at councils with multi-million-pound shortfalls in special needs funding.

Lincolnshire County Council paid Impower £479,000 between 2019 and 2021 to “transform” their SEND services after identifying “the growth in demand for statutory support was unsustainable”.

A case study highlighted on the firm’s website outlines how its work led to 414 fewer education health and care plans (EHCPs) and a 32 per cent drop in needs assessments. 

Titled ‘Valuing SEND in Lincolnshire’, the webpage says it led to a £5.3 million “projected cost avoidance”.

The devil will be in the detail but using experience and learning gained in promising projects like that in Lincolnshire should help to bring about the changes

Stephen Kingdom, from the Disabled Children’s Partnership, said the findings raise concerns the government’s new scheme is “simply a cost-cutting exercise and will make it even harder for parents to get the support they need for their disabled children”.

Impower focused on “delivering better outcomes by responding earlier and/or differently at lower cost”, according to the case study. 

This included concentrating on early intervention and reducing the “push” to move pupils with special needs from mainstream to specialist provision.

The firm also worked to “step down” children from specialist places – which are often more expensive – back to mainstream schools “where better outcomes can be achieved”.

This included using “behavioural science” to “reframe decision making”.

SEND
Childrens minister Will Quince

Impower’s case study explains how this delivered a “sustained and significant reduction” in new EHCPs, with 414 fewer new plans in the 2020-21 academic year than originally anticipated in the “ambition trajectory”.

Nationally, the number of pupils with an EHCP has risen from 237,000 in 2015-16 (2.8 per cent of all pupils) to 326,000 this year (3.7 per cent).

One anonymous Lincolnshire special school head is quoted as saying “that golden ticket [of the EHCP] doesn’t seem to be quite as golden as it used to be”.

But Chris Rossiter, a SEND expert and charity chief executive, said: “How is it possible to save money and improve support for children and young people, when so many of the issues are system-wide? 

“It would be incredible if savings were made whilst also improving access to high quality education. But focusing on the inefficient use of funding, above and beyond the availability of provision, is the wrong way around in my opinion.”

However, Sheridan Dodsworth, Lincolnshire council’s head of SEND, told Schools Week that an audit found that in more than two-thirds of cases “it was felt that something could have been done differently to prevent, delay or reduce the need for specialist support”. The audit included members of its parent carer forum.

She added: “Getting early intervention right is crucial for young people with SEN or disabilities and, if the support is available to meet their needs without the requirement for a statutory plan, this is also positive.” 

Impower did not respond to requests for comment. Its case study online states its work shows “outcomes are improving, specialist demand and spend has been reduced and partners and parents are increasingly positive about the change in culture and support that the approach has brought”. 

Margaret Mulholland, SEND specialist at school leaders’ union ASCL, said that the scheme would be welcome “as long as it is based on ambitions for recognising good practice and sharing it across the education spectrum, rather than being an exercise focused purely on cost-cutting”. 

SEND
Margaret Mulholland

“The devil will be in the detail but using experience and learning gained in promising projects like that in Lincolnshire should help to bring about the changes in understanding and good practice needed to repair a broken system.”

Adam Boddison, SEND expert and former head of charity Nasen, said the majority of councils overspending on their high needs budget suggests that the problem is national funding rather than individual council spending decisions. 

The DfE said that the scheme will help “lay the foundations” for reforms due to be announced in the upcoming SEND review, due to be published this month.

Latest education roles from

IT Technician

IT Technician

Harris Academy Morden

Teacher of Geography

Teacher of Geography

Harris Academy Orpington

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Exams Assistant

Exams Assistant

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Solihull College and University Centre

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Catch Up® Literacy and Catch Up® Numeracy are evidence-based interventions which are highly adaptable to meet the specific needs of SEND / ALN learners

Catch Up® is a not-for-profit charity working to address literacy and numeracy difficulties that contribute to underachievement. They offer...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

It’s Education’s Time to Shine: Celebrate your Education Community in 2025!

The deadline is approaching to nominate a colleague, team, whole school or college for the 2025 Pearson National Teaching...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Navigating NPQ Funding Cuts: An Apprenticeship Success Story

Last year’s NPQ funding cuts meant that half of England’s teachers faced costs of up to £4,000 to complete...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Embedding Formative Assessment: not just a box-ticking exercise but something long-term and meaningful for all

Our EFA programme has been proven to help schools achieve better GCSE results, as evidenced by the EEF. Find...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

SEND

How to solve SEND? 13 sector solutions…

The education committee received an 'unprecedented' number of responses to its SEND inquiry. Here's what we learned from it...

John Dickens
SEND

‘I’d like to see SEND label retired’, says inclusion tsar Tom Rees

DfE inclusion adviser also spoke of problems with the current 'medicalised model' of special educational needs support

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
SEND

ASCL head: Leaders turning away SEND kids need ‘calling out’

While wider reform is needed, leaders must create a 'culture that is more inclusive and more open', says union...

Freddie Whittaker
SEND

Cheaper to pay fines than provide SEND support

Councils pay families thousands of pounds for failure to provide support stipulated in EHCPs

Rosa Furneaux

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. Christopher Robertson

    An organisation with a very slick media profile, operating in a marketplace where there is big money to be made.

    We know that many local areas have ‘failed’ local area SEND Ofsted-CQC inspections since their introduction in 2016, with some still failing to improve following re-visits.

    A side-effect of this phenomenon has been the massive rise in local authority expenditure on ‘basking shark’ consultancy organisations to ‘fix things’, but often without any positive impact.

    The Impower ‘success’ project masks a system level wastage of millions of pounds in many
    local areas, money that could be spent on supporting children, young people and families more effectively, and in accord with the 2015 Children and Families Act.

  2. Peter Endersby

    The long awaited SEND review is criminally overdue but I fear it will just be a time and motion approach to cost cutting and create new barriers to limited funding.