Academies

Fact check: Do council schools really outperform academies?

Local Government Association analysis has some major flaws – here’s what you need to know...

Local Government Association analysis has some major flaws – here’s what you need to know...

Ofsted has rated a school good after overturning its recent inadequate judgment

Analysis published by the membership organisation for local authorities today has claimed council schools outperform academies.

But there are some big flaws in the main findings picked out by the Local Government Association (LGA), which have been seized on to call for a return of new council schools and to criticise the government’s academy reforms.

Here’s our explainer…

1. The major flaw with key council claim

The headline claim in the report is that 93 per cent of maintained schools are now rated ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’, compared to 87 per cent of academies.

The LGA’s Louise Gittins said the research was a “reminder of the superb performance of council-maintained schools”.

The findings were used to renew calls for councils to be allowed to open new maintained schools and gain powers to direct academies to admit pupils without a school place.

Steve Rollett

Dr Mary Bousted, joint general secretary of the National Education Union, said the findings “highlight the inherent harm of the Government’s push to full academisation within multi-academy trusts”.

However, there is a *big* caveat which has been less publicised and needs pointing out.

There are two routes for a school to become an academy.

Schools with higher Ofsted ratings can choose to convert, but schools deemed to be failing after being rated ‘inadequate’ are taken away from council oversight. Such sponsored academies are forced to join a trust, which is tasked with improving them.

Steve Rollett, deputy chief executive of the Confederation of School Trusts, pointed out the report “fails to recognise that over time the trust sector has taken on most of the schools that were long term challenges”.

As of May, 12 per cent of state schools were sponsored academies.

This means, as Rollett says, that the council sector has been left “with an unrepresentative and incomparable body of schools” – as all of its failing schools have been taken away and turned into academies.

2. LA school improvement findings also unfair …

Another of the report’s key findings was that maintained schools are more likely to have improved.

The LGA said 57 per cent of schools that were already an academy in August 2019 had improved to a ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ grade by 2023, compared to 73 per cent of maintained schools over the same period.

However this statistic actually included “inherited” grades for academies (the Ofsted grade the school achieved before it became an academy).

This is unfair, because the poor Ofsted grade that triggered academisation and was obtained while a school was under council oversight would have still been attributed to some of the academies in the analysis.

In reality, Ofsted grades are wiped clean when a school becomes an academy.

When comparing only academies that have actually had an inspection since converting, 71 per cent improved their grade to ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ – similar to council schools.

3. …and sponsored academies are improving faster

The statistic highlighted by the LGA also masks an improving picture for failing schools taken out of council control.

Using the inherited grades analysis: the proportion of sponsored academies rated ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ rose from 53 to 67 per cent between 2018 and 2023, a 14 percentage point rise.

Daniel Muijs
Daniel Muijs

Council-maintained schools in this period improved from 89 per cent to 93 per cent, a four percentage point rise.

Professor Daniel Muijs, a former head of research at Ofsted, said the “test” for sponsored academies was “whether they are improving. And data in the actual report suggests they are indeed the fastest improving group”.

However, comparing solely academies that have been inspected since converting, the improvement was smaller – from 75 to 81 per cent over the same period.

And for converter academies, just 90 per cent were ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ in 2023 – fewer than for councils – but a similar-sized rise (up from 87 per cent in 2019, which was used because they couldn’t rely on data for the year before).

4. Are council schools really more likely to stay ‘outstanding’?

The LGA has promoted a finding that a higher proportion of community schools “retained” their ‘outstanding’ grade, but again this is problematic.

The analysis found that 60 per cent of academies rated ‘outstanding’ in 2018 had the same grade in 2023, compared to 72 per cent of LA maintained schools.

However, this refers only to academies that have been inspected since conversion, whereas local authority schools included in the analysis included both those that had been inspected recently and those that had not.

Council schools not inspected for a long time (outstanding schools were exempt from routine inspection for a decade) would have kept their ‘outstanding’ grade by default, making it somewhat of an unfair comparison.

When academies with “inherited” grades from their local authority predecessor are taken into account, 73 per cent kept their ‘outstanding’ grades – which is actually more than councils.

Rollett said it was a “flawed report that lets down the public and the profession in both sectors by failing to distinguish between a proper analysis and ideology”.

But Professor Stephen Gorard said it was “clear that there is no evidence here that academies generally are getting better Ofsted grades than community schools”.

More from this theme

Academies

Academy trust top slicing is on the up (but do schools get better deal?)

As two trusts top-slice almost 10%, chiefs say running services in-house saves time and money for heads

Jack Dyson
Academies

Turnaround trusts say tide turning on recruiting converters

Wealth of lesson plans, specialist teaching teams and career paths helping to convince 'good' schools into turnarounds, CEOs say

Jack Dyson
Academies

Academise so LAs can’t close you, diocese tells schools

Leaked papers show 'key reason' for diocese's plans was to move school decisions away from councils

Jack Dyson
Academies

Barran wants more ‘good’ schools to join turnaround trusts

But academies minister reveals 'real challenge' of changing the 'joining a MAT is punishment' narrative

Jack Dyson
Academies

Highest-earning academy chief’s annual pay nears £500k

Harris Federation chief Sir Dan Moynihan's salary has risen at least 6 per cent

Jack Dyson
Academies

Catholic heads seek legal advice over diocese academy plan

Schools band together to consult KC and commission due diligence on trust as bishop unveils plans

Jack Dyson

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 Comments

  1. E Vine

    The whole system is broken and rooted in the the ancient past, a model T ford factory production system. OFSTED, Academies and the National Curriculum and a terminal examinations system all are there to bypass teachers and educationalists and centralise power to Westminster and political control. This comparison merely compares to identify which is least bad whilst still both failing to address the needs of a majority of children and educate a workforce fit for the 21st century.

  2. Nathan

    Education is too political and in the thrall of quite a narrow ideological movement. Public trust in teachers and the system is eroding quickly as activists and politically biased actors try to force systemic change either in the mechanics of the sector, in philosophies of sex and gender, class identity and more. If economics permitted I believe you’d see a significant and sustained rise in homeschooling. Parents don’t want their children whom they are responsible for raising becoming collateral damage in these contests or worse, the direct object of activists’ zeal.

  3. Nicholas Marshall

    Both the original study and the claims in Freddie’s article are flawed for a variety of reasons
    1. OFSTED grade is not a good determinant of school performance or improvement
    2. Many academies manipulate league tables by exam entry policies. They are significantly more likely to do this than maintained schools.
    3 The prime determinant of GCSE only( without vocational qualifications) is socioeconomic.
    4 Much attendance data is flawed and manipulated.
    5 Some schools cheat on exams to boost league table position.
    Metrics and a quasi market lead to unethical behaviours