Review by Dan Morrow

CEO, Dartmoor Multi Academy Trust

17 Oct 2021, 5:00

Book

It has led me to ensure our practices are truly anchored in the Nolan principles

The Great Education Robbery

By Nigel Gann

Publisher

Austin Macauley Publishers

ISBN 10

1398432717

Published

31 Aug 2021

As titles go, The Great Education Robbery is about as emotive as they come. And yet, you won’t find some crank conspiracy in these pages but a carefully unfolding analysis of the academisation programme at a micro and a macro level. In fact, the argument Gann posits – that the policy is fundamentally against the principles of democratic accountability – is wholly compelling.

“But,” I hear you cry, “you’re a MAT CEO. Are you not democratically accountable?”. Well, I like to think I am. At least, I try to make myself as accountable to my communities as I can. But that doesn’t negate Gann’s wider point. To be properly democratic, my accountability shouldn’t depend on my viewpoint.  

Taking as his ideological basis the Education Act of 1988, he argues both passionately and convincingly that the move away from community and local authority leadership of schools represents a fundamental and indeed fatal shift towards the corporatisation of schools.

He goes on to show that this move was a structured and intentional plan to create a new education leadership class of very wealthy and politically connected business owners. This new ‘blob’ has turned a public good into private profit, and used the shocks of Brexit and the pandemic to secure a hold on the market in government contracts. 

To an extent, it speaks to a system that was, rather than the one that is

“But hold on,” I hear you cry again, “are you a wealthy crony?”. Well, no. But frankly, some are. And the fact that some trusts are even to be passed down generationally on a somewhat feudal hereditary principle seems to prove Gann’s point. It won’t happen in my trust on my watch, but some future CEO and board of trustees could follow that path.

So this is powerful stuff. And Gann’s structure around what he calls the “seven deadly sins” of corporatised schools makes for quite the exposé on the de-democratisation of our education system and how the gains made since the Victorian era are being subverted.

But there is a fundamental flaw. Permeating the book is a sense of some halcyon “once upon a time” when democratic accountability through local government delivered a just and effective school system. Many will baulk at that.

And Gann pays little heed to the number of trusts and other informal partnerships between academies that have embraced civic leadership as the basis of their co-operation and operation. His idealism leads him to succumb to the temptation of equating legalistic structures with the effectiveness of their application. It wasn’t the case for local authorities and it isn’t for academies either. And I say this as someone who organised the resistance against the conversion of my own school over a decade ago, precisely for the reasons that Gann notes.

To an extent then, The Great Education Robbery speaks to a system that was, rather than the one that is. In terms of the ethics and leadership of the sector, what David Carter would call the MAT 2.0 system is already being enacted. And the work of the Confederation of School Trusts and other sector bodies has done much to redress gaps and to promote a better balance between democratic accountability and professional accountability, both of which are vital.

Gann also overlooks the sector’s response to the pandemic, which was characterised by previously unimaginable sector-wide collaboration. Academy trusts gave and continue to give support to colleagues in stand-alone academies and local authority schools alike, and there is no sense that this culture is going anywhere.

These criticisms aside, this book is an important reminder of our public duty. Reading it has led me to redouble our own efforts to ensure our practices are truly anchored in the Nolan principles.

It’s also a signpost to a better system, in which localism is not about ticking a box but ensuring the work we do is centred around all those we serve – not just those on our roll.

But mostly, it’s a cautionary tale about what could happen to our system if we don’t strike a balance between acting locally, and thinking globally.



More Reviews

The Voltage Effect by John A. List

John List's analysis of what works when scaling up impact will be useful to anyone involved in delivering the...

Find out more

Gerry Robinson’s blogs of the week, 9 May 2022

This week's top blogs cover British sign language in the classroom, revision routines, subject leader CPD and promoting wellbeing...

Find out more

TV review: Euros Lyn’s Heartstopper

The dialogue and charater development may be a little rom-com but the hopeful portrayal of an LGBTQ-inclusive world more...

Find out more

Sonia Thompson’s blogs of the week, 2 May 2022

This week's blogs cover reading, retrieval, assessment and effective professional development

Find out more

Review: Support not surveillance by Mary Bousted

Dan Morrow finds a deliberately polemical book full of evidence to contend with - whether you agree with its...

Find out more

Melissa Jane’s blogs of the week, 25 April 2022

Four blogs about recognising and managing stress for staff and pupils - and the problems with a system that...

Find out more

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.