News

Trust boss demands crackdown on SATs cheating



A no-nonsense academy trust boss has called for a shake-up of how SATs tests are administered – with secondary teachers being parachuted in to oversee tests in primaries – to stem the rise in cheating probes.

Sir John Townsley (pictured), chief executive of The Gorse Academies Trust which runs 11 schools in Leeds, believes every primary school should have an identified secondary partner to help them run tests.

His call follows a rise in SATs test results being suppressed because of cheating. Provisional data shows 2,688 test results were suppressed this year while the Standards and Testing Agency investigates maladministration, compared with just 723 last year.

Townsley, who has previously claimed to have pioneered the “zero-tolerance” approach to discipline, told Schools Week: “There is now too significant a minority of primary schools doing this for things not to change. The people who lose out are the great majority doing it properly.

“It is now an urgent matter because we’re moving to a place where a lot of primary schools are concerned they may be accused.”

At present, headteachers are responsible for ensuring staff running tests follow guidance. The government recommends heads also consider inviting a governor or “another trusted member of the school community” to observe tests.

Councils also send moderators into a quarter of primary schools signed up to their external moderation process to check that teacher judgments match national guidelines.

Townsley, who has previously written to schools minister Nick Gibb about his concerns, said the current system was clearly not working, adding school governors may also have a “vested interest” in not reporting problems.

However he said trustees from a primary school’s academy trust overseeing tests would be suitable – as they would want to ensure their secondary schools were given the correct results.

Sir John Townsley

But Stephen Tierney, chair of Headteachers’ Roundtable, warned the proposal was “a sledgehammer”.

More simple approaches could be effective, such as ensuring year-six teachers do not administer the test or having a senior staff member present if class teachers did not feel confident, he said.

Examples of maladministration include opening test papers early, changing test scripts outside of exam conditions and over-aiding in tests, Department for Education guidance states.

Last month, some results were annulled at the “outstanding”-rated Harris Primary Academy Kent House in south London, run by the Harris Federation, after pupils were “over-aided”.

Results were also annulled at another of the trust’s schools – Harris Academy Philip Lane in north London – for the same reason. The trust has promised an investigation.

Other known cases of results being annulled include St Matthew’s Church of England primary in north London and Oasis Academy Temple in Manchester.

Tierney said cheating exists in secondaries too and malpractice “might be more of a trust problem than a primary school problem”.

Kevin Courtney, joint general secretary of the National Education Union, said bringing in secondary school heads would just make SATs administration “even more unwieldy.”

A DfE spokesperson said detailed guidance is issued every year to remind schools of their test duties.



Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 Comments

  1. John Connor

    Secondary schools know nothing about how primary schools work. They frequently ignore transition information and condemn pupils to repeat chunks of work already covered in upper KS2. Leaving aside the nightmare of the logistical demands, this is patronising, fanciful and deeply unhelpful.

    • Alex Thirkill

      Whatever the merits of this proposal, it is important to note that there are problematic issues which secondary schools inherit from Primary. We work very hard with our partner schools on transition, but we often find examples of bad practice – particularly with SEND. Because primaries lack scale and the paperwork involved we find many students who clearly should have an EHCP starting in year 7 do not, which means they often do not receive the help [and us the funding] until year 8. When we speak to SEND students many of them seem to have spent a lot of Year 6 in the corridor, rather in lessons. It cuts both ways.

  2. Sven Doodar

    Goodhart’s Law: “When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.” Is there any wonder there is gaming/over-aiding/cheating when the stakes are so high? An extension of the problem is that targets for GCSE are based on dubious KS2 data. The whole situation is a kind of institutionalized mendacity.

  3. M Bradbury

    Patronising in the extreme. Typical misunderstanding and underestimation of the professionalism of primary staff. Of course, secondary schools have never been involved in maladministration (such as teaching to Alevels that they have helped set ).
    I have no beef with secondary schools but I wish some people would stop treating primary staff like second class citizens and give them the respect they deserve.

  4. Maybe we organise separate monitoring of his academies results as he seems to be very knowledgeable about cheating. Throwing out ill thought out and frankly stupid comments is not helpful in a national debate.