Labour should reframe its pledge to recruit 6,500 new teachers by factoring in retention too, so that it can deliver on the target within its first term in government, experts have said.
Keir Starmer has earmarked £450 million to recruit “6,500 new expert teachers in key subjects”. The manifesto pledge is listed among its six “first steps for change” in government.
But the new government faces challenging economic headwinds, flagging recruitment and rising numbers of teachers quitting. Labour has not said how it would deliver the pledge or set out a timeframe.
Reframe the target
Jack Worth, school workforce lead at the National Foundation for Educational Research, urged Labour to “reframe” the target to be about recruitment and retention – meaning it could be met by initiatives aimed at stopping so many teachers quitting.
Recent NFER analysis modelled how Labour could use the £450 million on a combination of pay rises and financial incentives to boost teacher supply.
One option was for Labour to spend the full amount on a 3.3 per cent increase in teacher pay next year, to reduce the supply gap by 4,000 by 2028. But just 600 would be “new” teachers, with retention accounting for the rest.
However, a lower pay rise (2.6 per cent), alongside £2,400 retention payments for teachers in their third year and boosting bursaries by £3,000 for most subjects would slash the teacher gap by 7,000, although only 2,000 of these would be new teachers.
Hilary Spencer, CEO at Ambition Institute, said Labour’s plans were “sensible and well-evidenced”, but warned that ministers must now find cost-efficient ways of delivering them.
She said: “Retention is crucial, too: it is better value both financially and in terms of expertise to keep more existing teachers in their roles.
“The capability and capacity of the education workforce will be fundamental to achieving their aims.”
Could be a long-term ambition
Sam Freedman, a former DfE advisor, said it was a “good thing” that Labour had identified teacher recruitment among its top six pledges, because they will have to act on it.
Speaking at the Festival of Education on polling day, he said he hoped that Labour would deliver 6,500 additional recruits every year, rather than just as a one off.
Worth predicted that the target will be “more of a five-year ambition” due to a lag between policy levers being pulled and new teachers joining the workforce.
The NFER predicted that the government would miss its teacher recruitment target again this year – the 11th time in 12 years.
But Freedman said the fact that Labour wanted to “spend quite significant chunks of cash on that does make you think they at least realise how big the problem is”.
Students to help in schools for debt write-off
Labour’s commanding majority gives it the mandate to do “bold things” in order to hit its recruitment target, Dame Alison Peacock, chief executive at the Chartered College of Teaching, said.
She suggested Labour could offer financial incentives to undergraduate and PhD students, such as money off their student debt, to entice them to work in schools.
Those studying subjects such as physics or chemistry could spend a few hours a week helping out at a local school, by planning and teaching lessons as part of an “innovative” solution to the sector’s workforce woes, she said.
“Potentially, it’s a really excellent recruitment source of future teachers,” she added.
Melanie Renowden, chief executive of the National Institute of Teaching, welcomed Labour’s plans to “create a resilient teaching workforce”.
She said the new government could also focus on “making routes into teaching more accessible; developing a place-based approach which targets recruitment where the need is greatest; and making professional development for leaders and classroom teachers the cornerstone of a retention strategy”.
Here’s what I don’t understand, as an ex teacher who had to quit due to caring responsibilities why given the work load associated with teaching won’t they accept more part timers especially in secondary schools! With the timetabling AI now, there should be no excuse (just because some admin promoted out of the classroom cant get their head around it). There are I would imagine probably thousands of ex teachers like me who would return if they could do between 2-3 days worth of timetable spread over the week/just those days but we are just excluded because of the short sightedness of current school recruitment. For example and for continuity of students I could happily teach every morning and in that time cover say GCSE or A’Level in my subject. However for some reason schools seem determined to be as inflexible as possible!
Our local Academy Trust has dreadful retention. Before throwing more money at the problem should the ESFA not consider special investigations into Trusts that have poor retention rates. They should look at any tribunal claims that have been brought against a Trust and the number of settlement agreements and why they happened. Time to look deeper at the cause and hold leaders accountable for the way they spend public money for the benefit of education.
First of all, the National Supply Teachers Network sent a letter to prospective Labour candidates in the run up to the election asking for them to consider the reasons for the poor levels of teacher retention, namely: 1) The punitive style of Ofsted leading to increased workload. 2) Headteachers weaponising the Capability procedure to remove experienced and thus expensive teachers. 3) Use of private supply agencies, which pay 40% less than the national teacher’s pay scale causing teachers to leave education for higher wages elsewhere. The incoming government need to reverse to use of private supply agencies and bring supply provision back in-house.
How about sorting out workload problems and offering a”return to teaching bonus” to those who have left within the last five years”.
That would be massively quicker and rebuild an experienced workforce rather than a glut of ECTs. Of course it would need to be funded so schools can pay the higher salaries of experienced teachers.
Too late for me, left ten years ago aged 55, but many may see a path back with a Labour government.
Did Labour not look at the data when considering their manifesto: “Nearly 40,000 teachers left the profession last year The DfE’s latest workforce data has shown that 39,930 teachers left the teaching profession in the 2021/2022 academic year for reasons other than retirement, which amounts to around 8.8 percent of teachers in the sector – this has increased from only 7,800 in the 2020/2021 academic year.”
You don’t need new teachers; you need to actually talk to those on the ground and look at why they are leaving. Lack of respect from pupils and parents, workload, money. It is a combination of all those things. A recruitment drive is not the solution.