Recruitment and retention

Party manifestos must address teacher pay and workload

With an election looming, the latest workforce figures show parties’ plans must focus on recruitment and retention as a top priority

With an election looming, the latest workforce figures show parties’ plans must focus on recruitment and retention as a top priority

Jack Worth said there were easy gains still to be made on teacher workloads

20 Mar 2024, 0:01

It’s five years since the DfE published its recruitment and retention strategy and since NFER began publishing our annual report on the teacher labour market in England. We aim to monitor the progress the system is making towards meeting the teacher supply challenge; but unfortunately, there isn’t much positive progress to report.

Despite some improvements in recruitment this year due to bursary increases, and some success in attracting more international applicants in physics, both recruitment and retention issues are persisting. Teacher supply is in a critical state that risks the quality of education that children and young people receive.

Overall, secondary recruitment into teacher training last year was just half of the required numbers. Our ITT recruitment forecast for this year, based on applications so far and newly-published targets, suggests that may improve to around 61 per cent of target. However, 10 out of 17 secondary subjects remain likely to under-recruit. Primary recruitment, which is usually at or above its target each year, is forecast to reach only 83 per cent of target next year.

Retaining more teachers would mean not needing to recruit so many. This would bring down the targets, but retention is a particular concern this year. After bouncing back to a similar level to what it was before the pandemic last year, the teacher leaving rate may rise further. DfE’s Working Lives of Teachers and Leaders (WLTL) survey data suggests that the number of teachers who are considering leaving increased by 44 per cent in 2022/23 compared to the previous year.

Behaviour is driving workload

Driving this is an increase in teacher workload pressures since the pandemic. Data from both the Labour Force Survey (LFS) and the WLTL survey shows that teachers’ working hours significantly increased in 2022/23 compared to the previous year.

Of course, workload is about more than simple working hours. It encompasses how the job feels and how pressures and stresses arise and are managed. Other workload-related indicators such as teacher job satisfaction and workload perceptions have also deteriorated since last year, suggesting working hours are related. Also, working hours matter because the DfE has set a workload reduction target, which will be challenging to meet if workload is in fact rising.

Workload reduction has been a policy priority for government, and its workload reduction taskforce is currently developing its recommendations. Reducing workload relating to marking, planning, administration and data have been the focus of previous efforts. But teachers are now saying that pupil behaviour is getting worse and contributing to higher workload.

In NFER’s latest research on workload, teachers said that their top priority area for workload reduction is behaviour management and pastoral care. They also cited more support from outside agencies for special educational needs and disability (SEND) support, mental health and safeguarding as a key enabler for further workload reduction.

We think the government should set up an independent review focusing on how to reduce teachers’ workload related to behaviour management and pastoral care. This should consider the role of external support services, as well as schools and teachers.

Pay levels persist as an issue

Last year’s pay award helped stall the real-terms fall in teacher pay since 2010/11, but teacher pay has been outstripped by strong earnings growth outside teaching since the pandemic.

We think the 2024 teacher pay award should exceed 3.1 per cent – the latest forecast of the rise in average earnings next year – to narrow this gap. This needs to be accompanied by a long-term strategy to improve the competitiveness of teacher pay while crucially ensuring schools have the funds to pay for it.

Further, pay increases could be used to compensate teachers for changes in the wider labour market that cannot be matched directly. We estimate that a 2 per cent pay uplift – over and above the necessary year-to-year rises to keep pace with outside earnings growth – would be needed to maintain competitiveness with other graduates, given the post-pandemic rise in remote and hybrid working.

Addressing pay and workload is key to supporting teacher recruitment and retention. This should be a focus for political parties in the run-up to the next general election and for the next parliament. Failing to act will risk affecting the quality of pupils’ education.

NFER’s new teacher workforce report is published today. Read the full report here

More from this theme

Recruitment and retention

DfE ‘inexplicably’ cuts back £10k teacher ‘relocation premium’

Grant to cover visa and health surcharge will only be available to qualified teachers and not trainees from next...

Lucas Cumiskey
Recruitment and retention

We need NHS-style long-term school workforce plan, says NIoT boss

Melanie Renowden wants to see education equivalent to health service's 15-year recruitment and retention plan

Lucas Cumiskey
Recruitment and retention

DfE slashes secondary teacher recruitment targets

The government missed its targets for both primary and secondary last year

Lucas Cumiskey
Recruitment and retention

New guidance to help schools tackle harassment of staff

But union said ‘we also need a clear message from government that aggression towards school staff will never be...

Schools Week Reporter
Recruitment and retention

AET heads to get £100k worth of CPD and sabbaticals

Leaders will get up to 100 hours of professional development each year in scheme to ‘bring joy back into...

Lucas Cumiskey
Recruitment and retention

Teachers’ home working ‘masks’ true workload challenge

Most leaders have not read government workload reduction toolkit, and just 1 in 10 found it 'useful'

Freddie Whittaker

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *