One in three academy trusts reviews pay after government warning

school funding

More than a third of academy trusts targeted by the government over CEO pay have chosen to review their policies or commit to future salary cuts for bosses.

Jonathan Slater, the DfE’s permanent secretary, confirmed today that of 213 trusts that received letters asking for justification of their bosses’ pay, 131 have demonstrated “that their processes for setting executive salaries were compliant with the challenge set out in the 2017 academies financial handbook”.

However, 11 trusts have had to commit to a reduction in salaries in the future, and two have even made “an immediate significant reduction in salaries following negotiations with the ESFA”.

Furthermore, 43 trusts have committed to reviewing their pay policy and processes “to ensure that levels of pay accurately reflect the level of educational and financial challenge faced by the trust, and the responsibilities of the individual being paid”.

And 52 trusts have now been “taken out of scope” of the clampdown, either because they have already reduced executive salaries or because they have closed. Schools Week revealed the names of 50 of these trusts last year.

Read more: The 50 academy trusts that cut chief executive pay, revealed

Some trusts are included in the above figures twice, but it means at least 82 of the 213 trusts (38 per cent) written to have taken or have pledged to take action.

A government clampdown on academy executive pay began in 2017, and ministers and school funding chiefs have now written a series of letters to single and multi-academy trusts on the matter.

In a letter to the parliamentary public accounts committee, sent to fill in gaps in evidence provided by Slater during a hearing in November, the senior civil servant also corrected comments made by Eileen Milner, the head of the ESFA.

“Eileen Milner said in the hearing that ‘between 2015-16 and 2016-17 about half those trusts ceased paying salaries at the level that came into scope’. In fact this is more like a quarter,” he said.

The letter did not name the trusts concerned.

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

One comment