Ofsted

Ofsted keeps report cards support (or lack of) secret

Unions blast the watchdog after it only provides a narrative summary of responses to its consultation

Unions blast the watchdog after it only provides a narrative summary of responses to its consultation

Exclusive

Ofsted is refusing to publish data showing how many people support its new report card inspections, despite pledging transparency over the high-profile reforms.

The watchdog revealed its final plan for the cards this week after making tweaks such as renaming grades and merging evaluation areas. The changes follow an initial public consultation.

Unions say the plans, which will be rolled out in November, are “much worse” than previous inspections and will only heap “more pressure” on leaders.

Teachers’ support for ditching headline grades has also plunged after details of the alternative have emerged.

The top of a report card

The watchdog received more than 6,500 responses to its consultation, 75 per cent of which were from education professionals. Twenty per cent were from parents and carers.

However, the inspectorate only provided a narrative summary of the responses in its own reply, published on Tuesday.

Completely unacceptable

The consultation had 102 “open-ended” questions. Ofsted’s summary revealed each was given a “sentiment code to indicate the overarching sentiment: positive, negative, mixed, neutral or irrelevant”.

Responses were also given a “thematic” code to help Ofsted “identify recurrent themes”.

When asked for a summary of this data, an Ofsted spokesperson said its consultation response was “very clear that we received a wealth of rich and varied feedback – all of which we took into account as we designed the renewed framework.

“We’re not publishing any further breakdown.”

Meanwhile, the inspectorate has been accused of leaning heavily on a smaller poll of parents’ views, which it said “showed strong parental support” for its plans.

Pepe Di’Iasio, the general secretary of the leaders’ union ASCL, said it was “completely unacceptable” that Ofsted had not published a quantitative analysis of its consultation.

Pepe Di'Iasio
Pepe DiIasio

“Complete transparency” was needed to “see in full” sector reactions to the “deeply problematic” proposals.

Paul Whiteman, the general secretary of the NAHT, also accused the inspectorate of avoiding “clear, multiple-choice style questions” on purpose to avoid “proper analysis of the level of support for, or opposition to, its proposals”.

In its consultation report, Ofsted said the plans “generated a mixed and sometimes negative reaction”.

Teachers welcomed “removing the overall effectiveness grade” and “greater nuance and detail in the report cards”.

However, it “also heard many concerns” about the proposed reporting system. Teachers backed a more narrative-based report, or a “met or not met” grading system.

Meanwhile, “organisations representing school professionals…had a strong negative reaction”.

Sir Martyn Oliver, the chief inspector, has previously pledged to be “open and transparent” over the reforms, with “nothing hidden from the system”.

Whiteman said publishing the data was an “important test of that commitment”.

Polls suggest dismay

Polls suggest growing dismay in the sector. In February, a Teacher Tapp survey showed 75 per cent of teachers supported removing single-word headline grades. But that plunged to 36 per cent this week after Ofsted published its finalised plans.

The percentage who had “mixed feelings” about moving from one-word grades also soared from 19 to 44 per cent.

Sir Martyn Oliver
Sir Martyn Oliver

While unrepresentative, polls from the NAHT and the National Education Union showed about 90 per cent of respondents opposed the plans.

Most also wanted the inspectorate to pause its plans – which they believe will not allow for reliable assessment of schools. Inspections will restart in November, initially for volunteer schools.

But Ofsted said Oliver “had a positive call” with 900 school leaders this week and it “looks forward to working with sector organisations in the months ahead to ensure a safe and secure introduction of the renewed framework”.

Latest education roles from

Senior Quality Officer

Senior Quality Officer

University of Lancashire

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Minerva Learning Trust

Head of Programme 2D Studies – City Lit

Head of Programme 2D Studies – City Lit

FEA

Group Director of Governance & Company Secretary

Group Director of Governance & Company Secretary

New City College

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Helping every learner use AI responsibly

AI didn’t wait to be invited into the classroom. It burst in mid-lesson. Across UK schools, pupils are already...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Retire Early, Live Fully: What Teachers Need to Consider First

Specialist Financial Adviser, William Adams, from Wesleyan Financial Services discusses what teachers should be considering when it comes to...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

AI Safety: From DfE Guidance to Classroom Confidence

Darren Coxon, edtech consultant and AI education specialist, working with The National College, explores the DfE’s expectations for AI...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

How accurate spend information is helping schools identify savings

One the biggest issues schools face when it comes to saving money on everyday purchases is a lack of...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Ofsted

Nudge unit calls for ‘eye-catching’ national Ofsted inspection survey

The Behavioural Insights Team also recommends Ofsted 'emphasise' in inspector training how to reduce the formality of conversations

Samantha Booth
Ofsted

Small schools demand Ofsted clarity over report card impact

Inspectors will conduct three learning walks on the first day of inspections and hold at least five 'reflection meetings'...

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

Ofsted chief calls for new state school standards ‘enshrined in law’

Sir Martyn Oliver says new legislation would 'stop Ofsted from tinkering' and 'deciding to do something new'

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

Ofsted inspections of MATs should be ungraded, says CST

Confederation of School Trusts (CST) gives its feedback on plans for academy trust inspections

Lydia Chantler-Hicks

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *