Ofsted

Ofsted proposes giving schools one of five ratings across 10 areas

Plans for report cards shared with leaders show schools graded from 'exemplary' to 'causing concern' against areas including teaching and inclusion

Plans for report cards shared with leaders show schools graded from 'exemplary' to 'causing concern' against areas including teaching and inclusion

Schools are set to be judged on a sliding scale from ‘exemplary’ to ‘causing concern’ against 10 evaluation areas including teaching, achievement, inclusion and preparation for next steps, proposals for new Ofsted report cards shared with leaders this week reveal.

It would mean schools would receive 10 separate ratings for different areas of their provision, rated ‘exemplary’, ‘strong practice’, ‘secure’, ‘attention needed’ and ‘causing concern’, the Financial Times reported.

The 10 judgment areas will be curriculum, teaching, achievement, leadership, behaviour and values, attendance, preparation for next steps, opportunities to thrive, inclusion and belonging and safeguarding, the newspaper reported.

The plans are still in development, and will also be subject to a consultation with the sector in January.

But the FT obtained slides showed to leaders this week setting out the details of what is currently being proposed.

In the leaked slides published by the Financial Times, the five proposed ratings are depicted with colour codes ranging from red to purple.

However, there are conflicting reports about whether Ofsted has settled on colour coding the system.

Single-phrase overall effectiveness grades were scrapped with immediate effect by the new government at the start of term.

This academic year, schools are receiving ratings from ‘outstanding’ to ‘inadequate’ in four to six existing sub-grades including quality of education and leadership and management.

10 grades for schools

The proposals from Ofsted would mean schools would receive 10 grades for their provision, which is likely to cause serious concerns among unions that have fought hard for the existing grading system to go.

Leaders have already raised concerns about Ofsted leading on the report cards design and the pace of their development. A formal consultation is due to be launched in January.

According to the slide published by the Financial Times, Ofsted wants report cards “to provide more nuance by inspecting each of the proposed evaluation areas against the proposed evaluation scale so that leaders and parents can understand the areas of strength and areas of development in the provision”.

An example text box, supposedly written by a parent, states (with their emphasis): “At my child’s school, the curriculum is strong, and teaching is secure. They offer an exemplary programme around the arts, music and sport but attention is needed around attendance.”

The slide also said Ofsted was “under a legal duty to report to DfE those schools it considers to be in a category of concern (designating schools as either ‘requires significant improvement’ or ‘special measures’).

“It is then a matter for DfE (as the regulator) to decide what action to take and how this aligns with DfE’s wider regulatory approach.”

Ofsted said it does not comment on leaks.

Union leader ‘worried’ about ‘direction of travel’

Pepe Di’Iasio, general secretary of the ASCL leaders’ union, said changes to inspections were “obviously a work in progress, but “it is fair to say that we are concerned about the apparent direction of travel which seems to us to be over-complicated. 

Pepe-Di'Iasio
Pepe DiIasio

He said the DfE and Ofsted “must take the appropriate time necessary to bring the profession and parents with them so that any changes can be communicated and considered before landing in schools and colleges”.

“While we cannot divulge the discussions taking place we are worried about what the DfE and Ofsted appear to have in mind.

“It feels as though they are engaged in a headlong rush to devise a new system against a very tight timetable in order to have it up and running by next September. We’d support them if they wanted to take longer as it is vital to get this right.”

A spokesperson for the NAHT said: “It is unfortunate that these matters are being openly debated in the press. The proposals have not been finalised, and we have no further comment.”

The proposal for separate judgments – including on attendance and teaching – was first revealed by The Telegraph last month.

An Ofsted source said the standalone focus on teaching would look at how well teachers are supported, and would not mean a return to inspectors doing lesson observations.

Latest education roles from

IT Technician

IT Technician

Harris Academy Morden

Teacher of Geography

Teacher of Geography

Harris Academy Orpington

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

Lecturer/Assessor in Electrical

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

Director of Management Information Systems (MIS)

South Gloucestershire and Stroud College

Exams Assistant

Exams Assistant

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Lecturer Electrical Installation

Solihull College and University Centre

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Inspiring Leadership Conference 2025: Invaluable Insights, Professional Learning Opportunities & A Supportive Community

This June, the Inspiring Leadership Conference enters its eleventh year and to mark the occasion the conference not only...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Catch Up® Literacy and Catch Up® Numeracy are evidence-based interventions which are highly adaptable to meet the specific needs of SEND / ALN learners

Catch Up® is a not-for-profit charity working to address literacy and numeracy difficulties that contribute to underachievement. They offer...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

It’s Education’s Time to Shine: Celebrate your Education Community in 2025!

The deadline is approaching to nominate a colleague, team, whole school or college for the 2025 Pearson National Teaching...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Navigating NPQ Funding Cuts: An Apprenticeship Success Story

Last year’s NPQ funding cuts meant that half of England’s teachers faced costs of up to £4,000 to complete...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Ofsted

Ofsted reform critics want ‘low-accountability system’, claims chief inspector

Sir Martyn Oliver says new report cards 'are not and never were going to bring about the end of...

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

Ofsted appoints Mark Vickers as external adviser for inclusion

AP academy trust CEO will be tasked with helping to implement Ofsted's reforms

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

Ofsted open to ‘another consultation’ on inspection reforms if sector demands rethink

Watchdog’s national director also insists report card proposals do not ‘throw the baby out with the bath water’

Schools Week Reporter
Ofsted

Ofsted claims inspections improved curriculum (*based on just 20 school visits)

Evaluation of current inspection framework criticised over tiny sample size – with Ofsted admitting reading prioritised over maths 

Lydia Chantler-Hicks

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 Comments

  1. Mike Wilson

    Oh, dear! You can just see how this is going to be incorrectly interpreted by the seniors on schools and the MATs. So increased workload for teaching staff and more pressure…and, more staff leaving the profession. It’s over. Teaching as a profession is as dead as a dodo…all ruined by these at the top.

  2. It would not return to inspectors doing lesson observations? I’ve never had an ofsted in 22 years that doesn’t include lesson observations.

    Along with countless learning walks throughout the year so slt can say we have seen enough evidence of good teaching, along with dragging ceo et Al from the wider trust (not that you get any feedback, not even 1 sentence, unless it’s pm) whilst still being told ‘we don’t do this for ofsted’

  3. Daddy Dodo

    What about support for leaders? This proposal sounds even worse than tbe current system. Any chance of national CPD programmes centrally funded rather than beating schools up all the time?

  4. Shaun Noyes

    Just been through Ofsted and it didn’t tell us anything we didn’t know. It must cost thousands in preparation and a stupid amount of time and anxiety. That’s before you factor in the cost of the inspection.

  5. Yvette Tullonge

    Can’t belive such a beautiful profession is just diminishing like that. For the past decade, no-one wants to become a teacher anymore. The ridiculous workload, constant observation and pressure to meet targets, take the fun away from teaching. The 21st century generation is leaving the profession like crazy, one or two years in and they are out. Not until things are corrected at the top, the profession will continue to deteriorate. Lessons have not be learnt from Ruth Perry’s death, the constant pressure on schools and staff.

  6. If this was implemented it would be a disaster for education. Single word judgements were scrapped because of the stress they caused. This new proposal amps up the pressure on teachers and could easily be used to justify an increasing amount of ‘evidence gathering’ i.e. paperwork being placed on an overstretched workforce.