Review by Harry Fletcher-Wood

Associate Dean at the Institute for Teaching

17 Dec 2018, 5:00

Paper

How to improve your lesson planning

I was recently asked for evidence on ways to help teachers improve their lesson planning.

My immediate reaction was a blank, but I was reassured to find that this was not just due to my own ignorance: in maths at least, “very few studies have explored how teachers can be deliberately supported to construct high-quality mathematics lesson plans (Ding and Carlson, 2013)”. I wondered what guidance I could find on helping teachers identify what they hoped students would learn and how they would achieve it.

I began by taking a step back and reviewing a paper that offers fascinating insight about effective planning. Carol Livingston and Hilda Borko studied a handful of novice and expert teachers, reviewing their planning, observing lessons and asking teachers to reflect on how they went. They found experts had a plan, but they didn’t sit down to write one: instead, they drew on their existing knowledge of powerful explanations and examples, chewing over approaches with their current class at odd moments.

Novices, by contrast, planned in time-consuming, inefficient ways, as they slowly made sense of what they were trying to teach. Experts’ plans were not too detailed or too tightly timed: they responded to students’ questions and suggestions as they arose, using their knowledge and experience. Novices’ incomplete knowledge prevented them from adapting their plans during lessons.

Livingston and Borko suggest novices can be helped to plan better by developing their knowledge of what they are teaching and skill in “pedagogical reasoning”: they invite mentors to explain their routines, model their thinking and provide feedback on novices’ plans.

Livingston, C., Borko, H. (1989) Expert-Novice Differences in Teaching: A Cognitive Analysis and Implications for Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education 37. 36-42.

Ding and Carlson (2013) put some of these ideas to the test. They taught teachers principles of cognitive science, then tried to help them put those principles into practice. They found that, initially, teachers could not see how to incorporate principles into their planning. They received “timely and targeted” feedback across three lesson plans, helped them to incorporate the desired measures (such as deep questions) and understand the cognitive science principles better: they ended up with “high-quality revised plans”. Nonetheless, they found that the quality of teachers’ plans dipped again once the course was over: ongoing support is important. Ding and Carlson conclude that “instead of asking teachers to practise writing many lesson plans, teacher educators and professional developers may first focus on one plan and ask teachers to make revisions.”

Ding, M. and Carlson, M. (2013). Elementary teachers’ learning to construct high-quality mathematics lesson plans: A Use of the IES Recommendations. The Elementary School Journal, 113(3), pp.359-385.

Two other perspectives:

• The Independent Workload Review Group work on planning noted that it was the planning of a sequence of lessons that matters – more than individual lesson plans; planning will be easier if teachers have fully-resourced schemes of work, specific planning time, and high-quality resources, such as textbooks.

Independent Teacher Workload Review Group (2016) Eliminating unnecessary workload around marking: Report of the Independent Teacher Workload Review Group. Department for Education.

• We might help teachers to make lessons structures that they use often routine: such as activities to plan an essay, read a text closely, or practise a conversation in a foreign language. Such structures “create a container within which a novice might rehearse the relational and improvisational work that teaching requires” – reducing the need for planning. This paper shows how they can work in teacher education.

McDonald, M., Kazemi, E. and Kavanagh, S. (2013). Core Practices and Pedagogies of Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), pp.378-386.



More Reviews

Review: Britain’s Strictest Headmistress

I was prepared to love or hate this documentary, writes Adam Boxer, but for better or worse it made...

Find out more

The Early Career Framework: origins, outcomes and opportunities

A treasure trove of ideas for implementing the ECF is hidden among the sometimes overwhelming amount of information in...

Find out more

Mary Hind-Portley’s blogs of the week, 16 May 2022

This week's blogs cover reconsolidation of knowledge, lethal mutations of classroom practices, refining student word choice and the tension...

Find out more

The Voltage Effect by John A. List

John List's analysis of what works when scaling up impact will be useful to anyone involved in delivering the...

Find out more

Gerry Robinson’s blogs of the week, 9 May 2022

This week's top blogs cover British sign language in the classroom, revision routines, subject leader CPD and promoting wellbeing...

Find out more

TV review: Euros Lyn’s Heartstopper

The dialogue and charater development may be a little rom-com but the hopeful portrayal of an LGBTQ-inclusive world more...

Find out more

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.