DfE names 16 grammar schools that will split £50m expansion cash

The 16 grammar schools that will split the government’s first round of expansion funding have been named by the Department for Education.

According to the Daily Mail, the schools will share the first £50 million from the selective schools expansion fund. The pot of money provides capital funding for grammar schools to create new buildings on their sites.

The fund, which will see £200 million handed over to selective schools that agree to improve access for poorer pupils over four years, has been heavily criticised at a time when non-selective schools also face a funding shortfall. In May, Schools Week revealed that grammar schools already get proportionally more money from the government than comprehensive to spend on buildings.

But ministers have defended their plans, claiming they will result in “significantly more” help for disadvantaged children.

According to the Mail, the 16 schools across 12 counties selected for the first round of funding have all pledged to prioritise disadvantaged applicants. This will be done either through quotas or by lowering pass marks for those below an income threshold.

The schools will also provide free preparation materials, like practice papers, for the 11-plus.

A lower pass mark for pupils eligible for pupil premium funding has been pledged by over half of the schools. Some have said they’ll lower the mark by up to 10 points, the Mail reported.

One school has even pledged to admit all disadvantaged pupils living nearby, even if their mark is lower than others, “as long as they meet a minimum standard”.

Despite these concessions, the anti-selection Comprehensive Future campaign group labelled grammar school expansion “an evidence-free policy”.

“Current research is unequivocal: there is absolutely no benefit to expanding grammar schools,” said Dr Nuala Burgess, the group’s chair. “Most importantly, grammar schools do not raise the attainment of disadvantaged pupils.

“At a time when all school are desperately short of funds, finding £50 million for grammar schools is unfair and unjust. Grammar schools create social and educational segregation with schools in surrounding areas left to educate higher numbers of middle and lower attaining pupils, and a disproportionate number of pupils with special educational needs.”

Burgess pointed to Comprehensive Future research on existing policies aimed at improving access to grammar schools.

“Ninety-six grammar schools had priority admission policies for poorer pupils in 2017. Nonetheless, only 574 disadvantaged pupils successfully accessed 12,431 available grammar school places,” she said.

The government first announced plans for its selective schools expansion fund in 2016, along with controversial proposals that would have seen the ban on new grammar schools lifted. Most of the plans in that green paper were shelved, however, when the government lost its majority at last year’s snap general election.

Plans for the expansion fund were revived in May of this year, when the government set out a series of compromises on its original proposals.

Damian Hinds, the education secretary, said selective schools were an “important part” of the diversity of England’s education system.

“I have always been clear that selective schools will only be able to expand if they meet the high bar we have set for increasing access for disadvantaged children, and all of these schools have done that. As a result, countless more children from disadvantaged areas will benefit from places at outstanding schools.”


The schools

Altrincham Grammar School for Boys, Trafford

Bournemouth School

Bournemouth School for girls

Chemsford County High School, Essex

Colchester County High School, Essex

Colyton Grammar School, Devon

John Hampden Grammar School, Buckinghamshire

Kendrick School, Reading

Lawrence Sheriff School, Warwickshire

Queen Mary’s Grammar School, Walsall

Queen Mary’s High School, Walsall

Sir Thomas Rich’s School, Gloucestershire

Sir William Borlase’s Grammar School, Buckinghamshire

St Michael’s Catholic Grammar School, Barnet

Rochester Grammar School, Medway

Wolverhampton Girls High School, Wolverhampton

Latest education roles from

Procurement Officer

Procurement Officer

RNN Group

Director of Marketing and Student Recruitment

Director of Marketing and Student Recruitment

Barnet and Southgate College

Professional Practice (TLA) Lead

Professional Practice (TLA) Lead

RNN Group

Health & Care Coordinator

Health & Care Coordinator

MidKent College

HR Assistant

HR Assistant

MidKent College

Principal, Cedar Mount Academy Bright Futures Educational Trust

Principal, Cedar Mount Academy Bright Futures Educational Trust

Satis Education

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Grammar schools have already been able to expand by becoming academies and increasing their PAN. This has resulted in grammars taking pupils from a wider area and eroding comprehensive education in nearby authorities if they’re close to a county border.
    The implication of this policy (and others, see below) is that the ‘gifted’ are more valuable and are better off segregated from their ‘ungifted’ peers (ie the majority of our children and young people).

  2. John Connor

    As Janet says. This evidence-free initiative is being smuggled in beneath the Brexit sound and fury, and with schools struggling with shrinking budgets is wholly ideologically driven and wholly reprehensible.

  3. Helen Jones

    Notice the majority are in the glorious south-east, after all no need to waste a good education on the cannon fodder of the North…. just one in the North. People who are watching the latest programme re schools and teaching are beginning to notice some of what’s going on ie huge salaries for ‘academy’ CEOs and their favoured staff, schools now top heavy with salaried admin wallahs with titles saying ‘deputy head or assistant head’ but who in fact do very little teaching. Notice how in the “school’ programme the proposals were always how to increase class sizes dramatically, cut support staff, cut non- exam subject time, make teaching staff redundant and never…. heaven forbid get some of these highly paid (teacher top scale salaried) SLT into the classroom where we can see just how many of them escaped the classroom as soon as possible because they were useless at the job of teaching! It is a disgrace that these ‘leadership’ teams are paid at the level that they are. The cutting of SLT is never featured; when you think about it – many schools years ago operated with one Head, and one maybe 2 deputies why do we need these huge leadership ‘teams’? The simple answer is that we don’t. There vast sums of money saved.

  4. Helen, I agree with most of your sentiments regarding the north-south divide, and I’m not in favour of selective/grammar education in general. But delighting all senior teachers is way off the mark. I’m an Assistant Head (responsible for a Sixth Form of 250+) and you’re welcome to come and see if I was just trying to escape the classroom!

  5. Emily Gilbert

    Colyton grammar school is for the most middle class in Devon an impossibly expensive area to live and only for the elite, this is disgraceful, my sons school in a poor area in Devon has made huge redundancies in recent years and my other son was out of school nearly a year due to shortage of specialist school places, this is the most disgraceful decision this government has made, absolutely unforgiveable!!!