Review by Anthony Radice

24 Jan 2016, 19:00

A Generation of Radical Educational Change: Stories from the field

This is a rather disparate and anecdotal collection of musings on education over the last 40 years. The things most of the contributors have in common are an adherence to progressive ideas (Plowden is always mentioned with warm approval); a contempt for those outside the professional fold, particularly politicians and the apparently clueless ordinary parents to whom they appeal; and a dislike of government interference, which is connected in their minds with nasty rightwingers who want to specify what schools teach.

Ordinary folk are conspicuously absent from the book in general, which breathes the rarefied air of the chosen few, those champions of “local accountability” who did whatever they liked in the heady days before they were actually held accountable, in any meaningful or direct way, to the parents on whose children they inflicted their noble ideals.

Overall, the book is critical of the top-down approach to educational reform, lamenting what it sees as the indifference of government to “professional opinion and serious research”. But for all their faults, politicians are aiming to represent the views of ordinary people, while the priesthood of professional administrators and academics has no such accountability. This cry of pain from the comfortable professional class is unlikely to find much sympathy with ordinary people.

But then, they’ll never read it anyway. Aimed at “aspiring headteachers and policy makers”, the tone of the book is that of an internal discussion between initiates, not a broader appeal to the population at large. One wonders whether it would be considered by some of the contributors a distasteful sort of demagoguery even to attempt to appeal to those not initiated into the labyrinthine mysteries of modern public education.

The title suggests that the book aims to report what is actually going on in schools. The “field” suggests the arena of battle. Nonetheless, with the exception of one journalist, and, of course, the venerable Lord Baker, all of the authors have spent most of their careers as administrators or academics rather than classroom teachers. It’s a self-enclosed and self-congratulatory group, convinced of its own rectitude, and drawing much of its “evidence” from the writings of other group members, or even from the authors’ own previous publications. From their sanctuary of impervious left liberal righteousness, the group looks out with horror and disgust at the antics of the nasty rightwing reactionaries that have spoiled their fun, and the foolish electorate that insists on repeatedly voting them into office

There is also an aloof refusal to engage with the example of the independent sector, to which so many of these ignorant, reactionary parents have fled, especially in London. How odd that they should insist on doing so, even while the ILEA was creating such a wonderful, “locally accountable” system.

The honourable exception in amongst all the stifling self-referential self-congratulation is Tim Oates, who delivers a brief and stimulating chapter on the importance of stability in assessment, in order to be able to measure the impact of reform. Unlike the other contributors, he actually engages directly with key ideas, instead of avoiding them by simply sticking political labels onto opponents, or pretending that the debate does not exist.

I avoided reading education books for years because they all seemed to be like this: detached, academic, jargon infested, and above all, determined to prevent a breakout of dangerous common sense in the sanctuary of the education theocracy.

If you want to enter the priesthood of educational administration, perhaps you’d benefit from learning some of its mystical language by reading books like this. If, on the other hand, you’re interested in actually promoting learning in the classroom, don’t bother. Do it for yourself instead. In a refreshing, if brief, departure from the ivory tower, Pring notes the phenomenon of teachers using social media for professional development in positive tones.

More typical of the contributors’ attitudes, however, is Peter Wilby’s dismissal of the “poorly informed comment” of blog writers, unless they be his allies, of course, as in the case of the Local Schools Network, who show an admirable determination to support local bureaucrats in their efforts to criticise the creation of schools such as Katharine Birbalsingh’s Michaela Free School.

More Reviews

Review: Britain’s Strictest Headmistress

I was prepared to love or hate this documentary, writes Adam Boxer, but for better or worse it made...

Find out more

The Early Career Framework: origins, outcomes and opportunities

A treasure trove of ideas for implementing the ECF is hidden among the sometimes overwhelming amount of information in...

Find out more

Mary Hind-Portley’s blogs of the week, 16 May 2022

This week's blogs cover reconsolidation of knowledge, lethal mutations of classroom practices, refining student word choice and the tension...

Find out more

The Voltage Effect by John A. List

John List's analysis of what works when scaling up impact will be useful to anyone involved in delivering the...

Find out more

Gerry Robinson’s blogs of the week, 9 May 2022

This week's top blogs cover British sign language in the classroom, revision routines, subject leader CPD and promoting wellbeing...

Find out more

TV review: Euros Lyn’s Heartstopper

The dialogue and charater development may be a little rom-com but the hopeful portrayal of an LGBTQ-inclusive world more...

Find out more

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


  1. Elizabeth Coppard

    Unfortunately I have not had (and do not anticipate to have in the near future, due to starting a doctoral research programme in chemistry education,after 30 years in the classroom)the time to read this book which I suspect is extremely interesting and full of insights into our troubled education system.

    Obviously because I have not read this I cannot make objective comments. However I find it sad that the review you publish appears so very biased in one direction.

    I do hope that you find other people to review it as well to give a more balanced view.

    If I get time in the next few weeks to read it I will proffer my own views.

  2. All I learnt from this review is that the reviewer did not like the book and obviously despises academies, the quality of the review itself is very poor and is merely a polemic.

  3. Gary Spruce

    This is a desperately poorly written review and I’m surprised that SW consider it to be publishable. By all means critique a book but do so through engaging seriously with the ideas it presents.

  4. I agree with the previous comments. This comes across to me as a hysterical rant resulting from fact that the reviewer disagrees with many of the views expressed in the book.

    Unlike Gary I am not surprised that SW have published it as it tends be be inline with the usual “traditional” and “oppressed” teachers who seem to be the main contributors these days post Academies Week.

    The reviewr has indeed continued the rant in even stronger terms on his blog and linked to the review.