Inclusion

SEND: MPs’ warning over home-to-school transport costs

The public accounts committee identifies 'glaring' unanswered questions on transport costs, predicted to reach £3bn in 2030

The public accounts committee identifies 'glaring' unanswered questions on transport costs, predicted to reach £3bn in 2030

The government’s promise to write off almost all of councils’ historic SEND deficits fails to consider “burgeoning” home-to-school transport costs, MPs have warned. 

The parliamentary public accounts committee has asked ministers to explain how their SEND reforms will affect these costs, previously predicted by the National Audit Office to reach £3 billion by 2030.

It comes as the Office for Budgetary Responsibility (OBR) warned SEND costs could actually increase ahead of reforms. 

In a report, the committee said that even if reforms announced last week are successful, it is “likely to be some time” before they translate into transport savings. 

The government plans to write off 90 per cent of historic high needs deficits up to March, with costs to be met from central departmental budgets from 2028-29.

But MPs warn there are “still unanswered questions” about the new deficits councils are expected to rack up in the years before the government takes on the cost pressures. These are expected to reach £9 billion.

‘Unanswered questions’

The government previously said that for these years it would take an “appropriate and proportionate approach, though it will not be unlimited”. But no further details have been released.

The new funding arrangements should address SEND cost pressures, but they wouldn’t cover transport costs, MPs added. 

The DfE expects demand and distances travelled to fall when children’s needs are identified and met earlier and closer to home. 

But Rachel Gilmour, a member of the public accounts committee, said “a problem this chronic and severe demands a response that does not leave any unanswered questions for children and families”.

The Liberal Democrat MP for Tiverton and Minehead added: “Unfortunately, our inquiry has identified a number of glaring ones for home-to-school transport – a problematic system for parents on which government spends multiple billions a year not covered by government’s recent announcements.”

MPs also claimed the DfE “does not understand” how access to transport is affecting attendance and doesn’t “yet have the data it needs to oversee transport effectively”.

They argued for better local transport options and integrated education and transport planning, especially rurally.

A DfE spokesperson said they were already taking action ahead of the reforms, including introducing a new national data collection for councils to benchmark spending.

They were also “creating a bespoke funding formula to direct money where it is needed most, and working with to give councils better tools to improve routes serving schools.

“Taken together we are confident these measures will address the concerns the committee has raised.”

Cost risk continues

The OBR said this week that the proposed SEND reforms and extra £4.1 billion in announced funding had reduced spending pressure, but “uncertainty around the impact of the reforms represents a continued risk to the forecast”. 

They said the DfE’s modelling of new education, health and care plans “assumes that the rate of increase will slow” between now and 2029-30. It projects it will then fall. 

But the OBR said the government “has not set out specifically how the reforms will deliver this or provided estimates of any cost savings”, adding: “Previous changes to the eligibility for public spending programmes, such as the replacement of disability living allowance with personal independence payment for extra-cost disability benefits, did not achieve the savings planning”.

There is a risk “reforms could increase spending in the short term if the volume of assessments increases ahead of September 2029 when EHCP assessments are due to change”. 

Latest education roles from

Member of the Corporation Board (Governor)

Member of the Corporation Board (Governor)

Newham College London

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Executive Officer

Learning Academies Trust

Head of Employment & Skills

Head of Employment & Skills

Gloucestershire County Council

Head of School

Head of School

Lift Cottingley

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

CPD Accreditation Among New Developments For The Inspiring Leadership Conference

As this year’s Inspiring Leadership Conference approaches, we highlight fives new initiatives and the core activities that make this...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Equity and agency for a changing world – how six core skills are transforming inclusive education

There is a familiar thread running through current government policy, curriculum reviews and public debate about education. We are...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Equitas: ASDAN’s new digital platform putting skills at the heart of learning

As schools and colleges continue to navigate increasingly complex learning needs, the demand for flexible, skills-focused provision has never...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Bett UK 2026: Learning without limits

Education is humanity’s greatest promise and our most urgent mission.

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Inclusion

Allergy guidance: What schools need to know

Proposed statutory guidance says all schools should stock spare allergy pens

Samantha Booth
Inclusion

‘There is nothing left to cut’: The schools counting the cost of inclusion

Schools Week investigates how the current system punishes inclusive schools financially, with leaders facing making cutbacks to maintain current...

Chaminda Jayanetti
Inclusion

More than half of specialist free school projects set to go ahead

Councils faced a choice between a new school and accepting alternative funding for SEND expansion

Ruth Lucas
Inclusion

David Bell to lead independent review on antisemitism in schools

School leaders have welcomed any support in tackling the issue

Samantha Booth

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *