Exams

Ofqual to publicly ‘rebuke’ rule-breaking exam boards

The regulator says the new punishment will help it take a more 'agile' approach

The regulator says the new punishment will help it take a more 'agile' approach

30 Oct 2025, 10:53

More from this author

Exam regulator Ofqual has awarded itself new powers to publicly “rebuke” rule-breaking exam boards. 

The new regulatory “tool”, announced today, is intended for cases where an awarding body’s rule-breaking is not serious enough to warrant a financial penalty.

The watchdog said the “chief regulator’s rebuke” sanction will fill an “important gap” in its enforcement options and “supports agile regulation”. It hopes the new penalty will mean simple cases of misconduct or malpractice can be resolved quickly.

Ofqual published its updated compliance policy for exam boards this morning.

Chief regulator Ian Bauckham said: “This updated policy reflects our agile approach to regulation.

“We want to ensure awarding organisations resolve issues early wherever possible.

“However, when awarding organisations do not meet our high standards, we will use our enforcement powers in the interests of students and all who rely on qualifications.”

It comes as new requirements are also due to come into force in December, requiring awarding bodies to act with “honesty and integrity” and ensure they “promote public confidence in qualifications”.

According to its 2024-25 annual report, Ofqual issued six regulatory interventions to awarding organisations, resulting in fines of £805,000.

The regulator also placed special conditions on a further 14 awarding organisations to assist with its investigations or manage risks.

During the same year, it regulated a total of 255 awarding bodies that are responsible for more than 10,000 active qualifications.

Right of appeal

Awarding bodies facing public criticism via a rebuke can appeal to the regulator’s enforcement panel before publication. Rebukes will not be published until the appeal period has ended.

Ofqual first launched a public consultation on punishing non-compliant awarding bodies in 2019, but later “paused” the policy’s introduction.

It re-launched a consultation on the new policy in February this year.

The regulator says it has also introduced “more flexibility in how it issues notices of intention, that it hopes will “allow for the process to move swiftly to resolution”.

Rob Nitsch, chief executive of the Federation of Awarding Bodies, said: “The introduction of a more nuanced approach to regulatory intervention is in the interests of all and it is to be welcomed that Ofqual has taken the time to consult on these adjustments twice.”

However, it is unclear whether the regulator’s rebuke power will shorten the sometimes lengthy delay between Ofqual concluding its investigations into awarding bodies and releasing details to the public.

Earlier this year, the regulator published the action taken against the Scottish Qualifications Authority stemming from an investigation that ended in 2022.

It also announced it had fined the Yorkshire awarding body Proqual £15,000 for breaches that dated back from 2018 to 2022.

An Ofqual spokesperson said: “Investigating regulatory breaches thoroughly takes time. However, the updated policy does introduce practical improvements. 

“We’ve streamlined the process for settling straightforward cases more quickly where organisations agree they’ve breached our conditions.

“This means simpler cases can be resolved faster, whilst complex investigations receive the rigorous attention they require.”

Latest education roles from

Executive Director of Finance – Moulton College

Executive Director of Finance – Moulton College

FEA

Director of Governance – HRUC

Director of Governance – HRUC

FEA

Principal and CEO

Principal and CEO

Hills Road Sixth Form College

Senior Quality Officer

Senior Quality Officer

University of Lancashire

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

IncludEd Conference: Get Inclusion Ready

As we all clamber to make sense of the new Ofsted framework, it can be hard to know where...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Helping every learner use AI responsibly

AI didn’t wait to be invited into the classroom. It burst in mid-lesson. Across UK schools, pupils are already...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Retire Early, Live Fully: What Teachers Need to Consider First

Specialist Financial Adviser, William Adams, from Wesleyan Financial Services discusses what teachers should be considering when it comes to...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

AI Safety: From DfE Guidance to Classroom Confidence

Darren Coxon, edtech consultant and AI education specialist, working with The National College, explores the DfE’s expectations for AI...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Exams

Skills white paper to confirm V-levels and GCSE re-sit ‘stepping stones’

New vocational courses will be the size of an A-level and replace existing alternatives to T-levels

Freddie Whittaker
Exams

Cyber-attacks, exam fees and digital vision…meet the new head of Cambridge OCR

Myles McGinley talks to Schools Week about his hopes for the future of curriculum and assessment

Freddie Whittaker
Exams

Exams: Try rest breaks before asking for extra time, schools told 

New JCQ guidance says supervised rest breaks 'often more effective and appropriate' than extra exam time

Ruth Lucas
Exams

Poorer pupils do better in more disadvantaged schools, report says

Researchers also find worst-performing areas for disadvantaged kids likely to have more poor white youngsters

Jack Dyson

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *