News

Exams 2020: Ofqual confirms final appeals process for GCSEs and A-levels



Schools will be able to appeal against GCSE and A-level results if they feel data used to standardise grades was not a “reliable basis” for predicting 2020 results, Ofqual has confirmed.

The exams regulator has set out the full arrangements for appeals this year, confirming that schools will be able to appeal if they were expecting results this year to “show a very different pattern of grades to results in previous years”.

All summer exams were cancelled this year following the Covid-19 outbreak. Instead, schools were asked to submit the grades they thought pupils would have received had they taken exams, and to rank pupils within those grades.

Exam boards have then used historical data to standardise grades, but this has prompted concerns that pupils at certain schools – such as those on an improvement journey or that have gone through recent big changes – could be adversely affected.

As set out earlier this year, Ofqual has confirmed that students will not be able to appeal themselves, but they will be able to ask their schools whether they have made an administrative error in submitting their grade or position in the rank order. If schools agree, they can submit an appeal to the exam board on pupils’ behalf.

Schools will be able to appeal if they believe something has gone wrong in processing the results, such as an error in their own submission, or if they believe an exam board has made a mistake “when calculating, assigning or communicating a grade”.

Schools will also be able to appeal if they can “evidence grades are lower than expected because previous cohorts are not sufficiently representative of this year’s students”.

This could include where a single-sex school has become co-educational, where there has been “significant change” in leadership or governance, where schools have experienced “monumental events” such as fire or flood.

Schools will also be able to appeal if they were “expecting results this year to show a very different pattern of grades to results in previous years”, Ofqual said.

“That could include where the grades of unusually high or low ability students been affected by the model because they fall outside the pattern of results in that centre in recent years,” said Ofqual.

“In most cases, this will only be apparent by reviewing centre-wide data. Therefore centres, rather than individual students, will be best placed to consider whether this has occurred.”

Ofqual has also published information to help students understand whether they might have reason to complain about bias or discrimination. Although they won’t be able to appeal on these grounds, pupils can make a complaint.

If they suspect bias or discrimination, students have been told to first speak to their school and raise a complaint through its complaints policy. If they feel their concerns are not addressed by their school, students can then consider raising concerns with the issuing exam board.

But Ofqual’s guidance states that this “would not be an appeal, but rather an allegation that malpractice or maladministration occurred in relation to your centre assessment grade(s) or rank order position(s)”.

The regulator said such allegations “would be serious, and taken seriously”, and that they would not be subject to the same deadlines as appeals.

The guidance also states that in cases where students have a concern about raising allegations with schools, it “may be appropriate for you to discuss this directly with the exam board instead”.

Students “can also contact the Equality Advisory Support Service for advice if they think they have evidence of discrimination”, Ofqual said.

 



Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. One important fact not mentioned here is that the exam boards have given themselves up to 84 days to respond to appeals.

    So the results of appeals won’t come back in time for students to decide whether to take the autumn exams, and they won’t come back in time for college or university entrance deadlines.

  2. Jane Yates

    What is shocking in Ofqual’s recent extension to the purported appeal process is how these types of representations are not in their standardisation model to begin with.

    Please do not believe the rhetoric coming from Ofqual and the D of E that the English model is somehow ‘fairer’ than the Scottish one. It is not. Both are based in essence on the schools past performance and not as any ‘fair ‘ system should be based , on individual merit.

    Please do not believe that English pupils are in a better position than Scottish pupils on the premise they have the opportunity to sit the exams in the Autumn.

    How are pupils going to revise for these whilst studying for A levels ? Who is going to teach them the remainder of the syllabus in those subjects where it was not completed before schools closed? Who is going to prepare the revision lessons they missed when schools closed? And it goes on.

    Boris Johnson reiterates how the system will be fair and enable all pupils to move on to their next stage. Not so if they are forced to redo a full year.

    This process will potentially disadvantage all pupils not just those in deprived areas. Bright pupils in mediocre or improving schools in non deprived areas are in danger of a huge negative impact.

    The whole process is flawed and contrary to natural justice on every level.

    The only way forward has to be adopting parity with Scotland and the grades awarded in line with teacher centre assessed grades . Schools adopted a rigorous approach to this process with layers of quality assurance and are far better placed to predict likely achievements than a faceless algorithm.

    Our pupils are already under enormous anxiety in these present times and their well-being should be central to this process.