News

EFA paid £16m for £5m Hackney free school site

The government paid £16 million for a free school site that was later valued by the council as worth £5.3 million.

The Education Funding Agency bought a former fire station in Hackney, north London, to house a new primary for 350 pupils run by the Hackney New School, based next door.

It is believed the government had to match a £16 million bid from a hotel developer to secure the site, which will also house 69 new flats.

But documents show the council valued the site at £5.3 million.

They also show the government wants to recoup as much of its spend as possible from the flats, which will also fund the school building.

However, the viability assessment found the development would not be profitable if it included affordable houses – so no such requirement was included. That is despite Hackney council’s policy that new housing developments should have 50 per cent of affordable housing.

Nick Perry, director of the Hackney Society planning group, said the “astronomical” land price was behind the lack of affordable homes “at the time of a housing crisis”.

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “We do not pay in excess of what a site is worth or purchase expensive sites if
there are better value for money alternatives in the area.”



Your thoughts

Leave a Reply to Mark Watson Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

  1. Mark Watson

    I love the fact that this article has just taken the view of Hackney Council as gospel.
    ‘The Council has said the site is worth £5 million so that must be the truth.’
    I’m sorry, but if a private business (the hotel developer) was prepared to pay £16 million for the land I would think that is a far better indicator of the value of the site than the view of someone at the Council. (London LAs not exactly being known for being at the cutting edge of commercial property.)
    But has SchoolsWeek done any form of investigative journalism to find out what an independent expert would value the site at? Of course not. Far easier just to bung up a sensationalist headline and sod the truth of the matter …

  2. Mark Watson

    I love the fact that this article has just taken the view of Hackney Council as gospel.
    ‘The Council has said the site is worth £5 million so that must be the truth.’
    I’m sorry, but if a private business (the hotel developer) was prepared to pay £16 million for the land I would think that is a far better indicator of the value of the site than the view of someone at the Council. (London LAs not exactly being known for being at the cutting edge of commercial property.)
    But has SchoolsWeek done any form of investigative journalism to find out what an independent expert would value the site at? Of course not. Far easier just to bung up a sensationalist headline and sod the truth of the matter …

  3. I’d be interested to know whether there are any links between the developer/agent and any stakeholders in the new school, which might have resulted in a price hike (but I’m positive there won’t be).