Durand wants £3m to hand back buildings (and they are ‘confident’ of winning legal fight)


The operators of commercial facilities run from the site of the former Durand Academy in south London want about £3 million in compensation to return them to public hands – and believe they will win a legal challenge to get it.

The Durand Education Trust (DET), which still owns a leisure centre and accommodation on the site in Lambeth, will take the Department for Education to court next month to demand money “over and above” the net book value of the assets it holds.

Schools Week understands that Lambeth Council will have to foot the bill if the legal challenge succeeds.

The loser has been the taxpayer and the public, who have seen their assets sequestered away

It marks the latest development in an ongoing saga in which the school reopened in 2018 as Van Gogh Primary under the sponsorship of the Dunraven Educational Trust.

The latest accounts for the Durand trust show that assets of more than £10 million were transferred to Dunraven when the school changed hands.

Durand’s trustees have argued they should not have to transfer the remaining land and buildings “without consideration”, and say in the trust’s latest accounts that they are “confident of a successful outcome” in their legal challenge.

“The trustees have challenged the right of the secretary of state to take over these assets without providing reasonable compensation.” The case is expected to be heard next month.

Dr Mary Bousted, the joint general secretary of the National Education Union, said there was a lack of due diligence from the government when the school became an academy in 2010.

“This was always going to be the endless result of a hopeless drive to academise without thinking about the assets handed out to sponsors,” she said.

“The loser has been the taxpayer and the public, who have seen their assets sequestered away and now we’re seeing the endgame: a charity is demanding money to hand back assets that were given to it for free.”

The accounts also claim the trust is in “advanced negotiations” with Lambeth to lease the properties back once they are transferred to allow it to trade “for a term of at least 18 months”.

It is understood that under the arrangement, London Horizons, DET’s trading arm, will run the leisure and accommodation facilities until a competitive tender process is launched for a new provider.

However, the documents also reveal that trustees anticipate that the coronavirus pandemic will have had a “hugely negative impact” on profits.

Lambeth council confirmed that it had been “working to reach agreement, in line with the Department for Education’s directions, and hope to conclude transfer and leasing arrangements in the near future”.

The DfE said all parties “continue to work towards the transfer of the commercial land”.

Lambeth transferred the school’s land and buildings to the Durand Academy Trust when the school academised in 2010. The academy then transferred the assets – worth about £15 million, according to the National Audit Office – to DET.

Using the London Horizons subsidiary, DET then ran the leisure and accommodation facilities, with profits invested back into the school. However, Sir Greg Martin, the headteacher, was paid a sizeable annual management fee, taking his combined salary to more than £400,000.

The government ordered the school’s rebrokerage in 2016 after it refused to cut ties with Martin. He stood down as head in 2015, but soon after became the school’s chair of governors.

The trustees have challenged the right of the secretary of state to take over these assets without providing reasonable compensation

The latest accounts show that the DET finished the 2017-18 year with fixed assets of £16,415,046. In 2018-19, the group transferred £10,536,638 of assets – the school buildings and land at Hackford Road and Mostyn Gardens – to the Dunraven trust.

The group then finished the year with assets of £3,304,022, which is understood to relate to the school’s satellite boarding site in West Sussex, which had not been sold. That left £2,574,386 unaccounted-for.

This was explained in the trust’s 2018-19 accounts, which state that the remaining Hackford Road properties were excluded from the financial statements to take account of the direction of the education secretary, which did not include provision for any compensation.

But the trust has vowed to fight for compensation “commensurate with and inclusive of the enhanced value, over and above the original net book value, that is properly attributable to them”.

David Boyle, the chief executive of the Dunraven trust, said he “remains grateful for the ongoing support from the DfE and ESFA working with Lambeth to bring this matter to a long-awaited conclusion for the benefit of the children of Van Gogh primary”.


Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


  1. Janet Downs

    When the Public Accounts Committee grilled Sir Greg Martin in early 2015, the committee wanted to know whether the assets held by Durand Educational Trust (DET) were public assets or private. They also wanted to know why these assets were transferred from Durand Academy Trust to DET. Was it to move them out of reach of the Secretary of State? asked the Chief Auditor.

    Yes, replied Sir Greg.

    This answer makes compensation unnecessary, surely?

    • Janet Downs

      You’re right – foundation status allowed Durand Primary School to take over LA. On academization, the assets moved to Durand Academy Trust (DAT). DAT transferred them to Durand Educational Trust. Greg Martin admitted this move was to keep the assets out of the hands of the Secretary of State (see my comment above). If the assets had remained with DAT, then they would have been transferred to the new academy trust. They couldn’t be because they weren’t held by DAT but by DET. Hence the legal wrangle.

  2. Mark Watson

    This all came about because Durand Primary School became an academy “early” in the process back in 2010. At that point in time the DfE, naively in retrospect, did not include a clause in their funding agreements which required academy trusts to enter a restriction against the legal title to the school land which imposed an obligation to get DfE consent before transferring the land to another entity. This is now standard practice so shouldn’t happen now.

    As I said, it was naïve of DfE not to cover this off from the outset, but in reality this type of problem arises every single time a Government brings in a new system, be it education, health, transport etc., or drafts new legislation. The first iteration of legal documents always has gaps that can be taken advantage of. As time goes on and experience grows, the gaps are dealt with. It seems so obvious in retrospect how this type of scenario was a risk, but it presumably wasn’t recognised back in 2010 …

    • Janet Downs

      Mark – you’re right that the Academies Act had ‘teething troubles’ but many of these could have been rectified if Michael Gove had allowed more time for the Bill to be scrutinised. As it was, he railroaded the Bill through Parliament with the speed usually seen only in national emergencies. He also had a few headteachers (Martin included) ready to convert on 1 September 2010, just a few weeks after the Bill received Royal Assent on 27 July 2010. How fortuitous that these schools managed to consult stakeholders and draw up the legal documents in such a short time. A cynic might conclude they were acting in collusion with the Secretary of State, but I couldn’t possibly comment.

      • Mark Watson

        Not to rain on your conspiracy parade (which I’m not denying has every potential to be true), but the Academies Bill was included in the Queen’s Speech on 25th May 2010 (along with 23 other Bills). Also (according to Wikipedia, so I can’t vouch for it myself) all schools were written to after the election inviting them to become academies and within three weeks 70% of all outstanding secondary schools expressed interest, including 828 Outstanding schools. So it’s not really a case of having a standing start on 27 July – by then any school interested in becoming an academy had already had at least two months to get things rolling.

        In terms of allowing more time for the Bill to be scrutinised it is certainly true that Bills almost always benefit from having more time to be debated, but that is always the case no matter how long they are given. Would this particular land issue have been picked up if the Bill had been given another few months of debate? Frankly I think it unlikely.