Brett Wigdortz, founder, Teach First

“I have never known what is weird and what is not,” says Brett Wigdortz, the man who founded teacher training programme Teach First 15 years ago and, as its chief executive, oversaw its meteoric rise before stepping aside this summer. Born in Asbury Park, New Jersey – Bruce Springsteen’s home town – Wigdortz’s north Atlantic […]

“I have never known what is weird and what is not,” says Brett Wigdortz, the man who founded teacher training programme Teach First 15 years ago and, as its chief executive, oversaw its meteoric rise before stepping aside this summer.

Born in Asbury Park, New Jersey – Bruce Springsteen’s home town – Wigdortz’s north Atlantic twang remains as strong as ever. It means his talk of “social justice” and “ambassadors” for the Teach First programme sound dorkier, almost clichéd, than when spoken in more hushed British tones.

But his self-confessed lack of awareness means he’s never been put off as an overenthusiastic cheerleader. Besides, he simply doesn’t accept that missions to overcome social inequality are somehow “un-British”.

“Go to the William Wilberforce Museum, and you can see a very British movement in the 19th century that helped Britain become one of the first countries to end the slave trade,” he enthuses. “Or, you know, there’s the anti-apartheid movement from 30 years ago that was quite powerful in England. And, you know, no-one is smoking indoors in Britain today, and that’s not just a magical thing; that happened because a whole movement of health professionals worked together to ensure that second-hand smoke wouldn’t damage people’s lungs and hearts anymore.”

Sometimes I think about the film Sliding Doors, and somewhere out there a version of me finished up working in Jakarta

Wigdortz was in his late twenties, organising a start-up bank he had created for the lower-middle classes in Jarkata, when his bosses at McKinsey suggested he spend a year in London in order to improve his knowledge of financial markets. Arriving in the capital, he found financial projects thin on the ground and was instead put on a project looking at how businesses could help schools in London which, at that time, were struggling with recruitment and poor academic outcomes.

“I said, ‘oh great, my family are all teachers,’ and I was really interested. That was a life-changing moment, basically,” he recalls. “A very coincidental one. Sometimes I think about the film Sliding Doors, and somewhere out there a version of me finished up working in Jakarta and then went on to banking in Singapore.”

Two years later, Teach First took its first cohort of graduates into classrooms and never looked back. That first group involved 186 graduates; this month over 1,400 trainees started in classrooms.

Wigdortz says he always dreamed the programme would be “big” but kept it quiet. “I never said ‘we’ll definitely get 3,000 people’ because people would have thought I was even madder and crazier than I already thought I was,” he says.

Fifteen years on, it is easy to forget the barriers the programme faced in its first few years. Teach Firsters were shunned in staffrooms by staff angry that “unqualified” teachers were allowed their own classes. Newspapers wrote angry columns. The name particularly irked, as the phrase “teach first, do something else later” became a common refrain from teachers angry that the marketing suggested participants should go on to work in private business in the future.

Yet Wigdortz was undeterred. He wanted the first cohort to be around the 200 mark and for it to grow each year. He pushed to get the programme into primary schools, and into Wales. He has worked on the Teach For All board that has put a version of the programme into 45 countries across the world.

What are the lessons he learned during this growth?

“Don’t worry about the valleys of death, because there’s always a hill of happiness around the corner,” he says gleefully.

Anyone who has ever watched Wigdortz speak on stage will have heard this phrase before. He regularly uses it to motivate newbie teachers through their first year.

He has also faced some hairy situations himself When setting up Teach First, the organisation needed a university to train its teachers. They put out a tender, but no-one bid. Oone organisation put in a half-bid but only for 50 teachers and only if they could do the training via video.

I’m always going to have a relationship with Teach First

Wigdortz turned to Sonia Blandford, a leading education academic, in the January before trainees were due to start in June. Through “entrepreneurial spirit” and a lot of negotiation, Canterbury Christ Church University agreed to step in and take the graduates. The whole programme had to be designed in just five months.

“It was a pretty good programme actually,” Wigdortz says. “Not as great as it is now, but I think we did a pretty good job in that first summer.”

For nine years Dame Julia Cleveden chaired the organisation and helped him to see the importance of looking out for his staff. “She would ask why a person was looking stressed and if had I spoken to them,” he says. “If a person was ill she would ask if I had sent flowers. Beforehand I wouldn’t naturally have thought of that; I was a strategy consultant, and I saw people simply as a way of implementing a strategy.”

In his autobiography, he has also written of his overly optimistic  decision not to recruit a finance director in the first year, but instead to hire a “head of alumni”.

“If I had to do that over, I would have raised more money and hired both early on,” he admits.

Challenging Wigdortz on any of TeachFirst’s issues is a disappointing strategy. He recognises “valid criticism” over the academic side of programme – that’s why it now offers a postgraduate diploma (an extended PGCE). On its expensiveness, he points out that heads are repeat customers and many credit trainees for helping improve their schools. He spins every critique to a positive.

So why leave when he’s so enthusiastic and optimistic about its future?

“The first thing to say is, for my whole life, I’m always going to have a relationship with Teach First and I’m really excited to be honorary president and the founder,” he says, in a tone far less creepy than it sounds on paper. “I say this to ambassadors – you never get to leave this movement!”

Second, he explains how his great uncle went to law school in his sixties: “He graduated at 63, and practised law for 20 years into his eighties. He helped homeless people and asylum seekers. I learned from that the importance of always learning through life, and being open to doing things very differently, not just sitting on your laurels basing things on your past success.”

So what will he do now?

“I don’t exactly have a plan,” he admits. “I really want to focus on something that can make disruptive, transformational change.”

Parenthood has focused him on early years and what can be done to help children get ready for school. He also worries about childhood obesity, employability, social mobility, and vocational training. If those sectors aren’t ready for disruptive transformation, history suggests that minor inconvenience isn’t going to stop him from having a go anyway.

In the meantime, however, he says one of his biggest points of pride are the spin-off Teach First programmes in other sectors: Frontline in social work, Unlocked in prisons and Police Now all operate on a model aped from his first programme.

“That’s the dream. I mean it. It’s amazing. They are having such a positive effect on so many people. Doing so much good. It is brilliant to know we had anything to do with that,” he says.

It’s a personal thing

What is your favourite book?

It used to be Catcher in the Rye until I got older and realised what a jerk Holden Caulfield is. Recently read “Stranger than we can imagine: making sense of the 20th Century” and found it really insightful.

What would you do if you were invisible for a day?

I’d be pretty fascinated to see what my kids get up to in school each day…

If you could have a superpower what would it be?

I would love the ability to time travel and see what things were really like in the past and possibilities in the future.

Describe a party you went to as a child

I grew up in the Jersey Shore and remember a beach party as a teenager where we tried to light a bonfire and almost got arrested. Most of my other childhood parties involved bowling, mini-golf or being scared a girl would ask me to dance.

What do you eat for breakfast?

I always force a banana on my children. I’m more museli, fruit, and yogurt.



More Profiles

Interview: Joe Hallgarten

The new chief executive of The Centre for Education and Youth, Joe Hallgarten, is interested in the space for...

Jess Staufenberg

Interview: Annamarie Hassall

Annamarie Hassall became chief executive of the National Association for Special Educational Needs last week. The former DfE adviser...

Jess Staufenberg

Interview: Anne Longfield

The former children’s commissioner Anne Longfield has unfinished business, particularly around child poverty. She tells Jess Staufenberg why she’s...

Jess Staufenberg

Interview: Nadine Bernard

Nadine Bernard, headteacher at Van Gogh primary school, landed her first headship at one of the most infamous academy...

Jess Staufenberg

Civil servants spend too much time in a room with other civil servants

After four years in the job, Jonathan Slater was unceremoniously sacked as permanent secretary of the Department for Education....

Jess Staufenberg

Introducing… Ndidi Okezie

Ndidi Okezie has done that rare thing and crossed the divide between teaching and youth work. Always the problem-solver, she’s...

Jess Staufenberg

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. I think this puff-piece for Laura’s old boss needs a spell checker.

    What people need to realise about Wigdortz and Teach First is that it’s not really about Wigdortz or Teach First at all. This initiative is all about central government appetite for greater influence over teachers and schools, and McKinsey made that happen. Ex-McKinsey Wigdortz is just the public face of that power grab. He’s moved on because government probably think Teach First is here to stay, and his reward is a life of overseas travel, award ceremonies, organising committees, and echo-chamber interviews like this.

    As an educator, there is nothing remotely positive to say about sending people into schools without sufficient training. In fact, this scheme that exploits the ignorance and blunter elbows of poorer parents is a national disgrace, and something which middle-class parents – like Wigdortz’s – would never stand for.

    Ultimately, an education system should aim for the best, not settle for clever, temporary fixes like Teach First.

    • Ianthe Wright

      It is no good being prejudiced against a scheme that has really done great things.
      Brett himself was the force behind the programme: it was not a ministerial idea, but the enlightened ones saw the value and pushed hard to make it happen. Because the establishment thought they didn’t need it, they restricted Teach First to areas of deprivation (where there were already difficulties recruiting teachers). That worked well with Teach First’s motivations, and continued to determine where they were eventually (and gradually) allowed to expand.
      First I can say that most civil servants at the start mostly hated Teach First, as did the teachers, because it promised very high, bucked the system, and managed to influence people (not just government) to fund it. It sometimes overpromised (e.g. how many they could recruit)- but since everyone they recruited was extra to the teacher trainees in the traditional system that was no crime.
      Like all the best things, the programme relies on merit and ambition rather than time service and tradition: it grabs bright and managerially competent graduates who had not planned to go into teaching. The’grab’ works because it doesn’t say ‘change your plans’, but ‘delay your plans for two years while you do some good as teachers and get good leadership training’ – both transferable skills to help in their future careers.
      A further good aspect of the plan was that those who didn’t stay in teaching are expected to be ‘ambassadors’ for education in the businesses/ professions to which they progressed. These ambassadors have also made a big difference, encouraging business/school links; being governors; and sometimes coming back again to teaching.
      There is lots of training, and the teachers are assessed for the same Qualified Teacher Status that other teacher trainees are.. the training just comes in different ways, starting with a summer school before the autumn term, mentoring throughout and strong alumni involvement. Brett has all along set a hugely motivational programme, asking them all to go the extra mile attending regular events and networking. Each teacher has to bring innovation to their school(s). You could say it is like an apprenticeship- learning on the job with structured academic input. Isn’t that what we are coming to see again as the right way to develop new employees?