Wilshaw: leaked memo from Gove aide comes as no surprise

Ofsted chief Sir Michael Wilshaw has hit back at claims former Education Secretary Michael Gove considered replacing him, saying he was not surprised given “smear campaigns” against him.

Sir Michael responded to a report in the Guardian featuring an internal Department for Education (DfE) memo from last year by Mr Gove’s former special adviser Dominic Cummings.

Mr Cummings strongly criticised the chief inspector’s performance and described the education watchdog as “not accountable for their failures”.

The memo said: “Despite constant pressure from us and constant assurances, there is no evidence that [Wilshaw] is substantially changing the organisation — and considerable evidence from a constant flow of blogs and emails that problems are either the same or getting worse.

“People who talk to MW say they are not confident in his management abilities.

“It seems he cannot break the cycle of speeches and media attention — this cycle continues regardless of however many times he is asked to focus.”

However, Sir Michael said: “The document leaked to the Guardian comes as no surprise to me. Indeed, I raised my concerns publicly about plots and smear campaigns against Ofsted and me personally by political advisers back in January.

“I am in good company. The Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister have also come under fire from one particular former adviser to Michael Gove.”

He added: “I will not allow Ofsted to be politicised and I will not be swayed from making the difficult decisions that are sometimes necessary to raise standards in our country.

“Nor will I be deterred from shining a spotlight on poor performance, whether in academy chains, free schools or local authority schools, no matter how uncomfortable this may be for some people.

“Of course, Ofsted is not perfect but I firmly believe we are a force for good.”

Tristram Hunt

Since leaving the DfE in January, Mr Cummings has been an outspoken critic of the Coalition, with tough words for both Prime Minister David Cameron and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg.

Nevertheless, the Guardian also quoted a source close to the DfE as saying that before Mr Gove left office in the summer there were “serious discussions at the top of Whitehall” about replacing Sir Michael.

Mr Wilshaw said: “We will always encounter those who wish to undermine the important work we are doing for their own narrow interests. If that is the price of genuine independence, then it is one worth paying.”

Shadow Education Secretary Tristram Hunt called for ministers to explain to Parliament “the actions of this government” over the row.

“This raises very serious questions for David Cameron’s government about its systematic attempt to undermine Ofsted and destabilise Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector,” he said.

“The press briefings against Sir Michael Wilshaw, the sacking of [Ofsted chairperson] Sally Morgan and this revelation: the evidence is now unequivocal. It’s totally unacceptable and ministers should come to the House of Commons to explain to Parliament the actions of this government”

A DfE spokesperson said that it did not comment on leaked documents, but said: “Sir Michael Wilshaw and Ofsted are doing a very important job, including critical work around child protection.

“The Secretary of State has a constructive working relationship with Sir Michael.”

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


  1. Alastair Thomson

    Mr Cummings has some interesting ideas – and wanting to improve the English education system is a praiseworthy goal. Nevertheless I find is arrogance absolutely breathtaking.

    OK, he used to be an adviser to a former secretary of state for education but does this mean his rude and ignorant critique of HMCI and even the PM need to be amplified by the media?

    What exactly in his CV gives his words any weight? Has he ever run for elected office? Has he ever taught Bakers 3 on a wet Wednesday in an FE college or 5C in a school? Is he a parent? A wealth-creating employer, a philanthropist or public servant?

    No. He’s just a mate of Mr Gove who has an exaggerated sense of his own importance, some bees in his bonnet and a chip on his shoulder that wiser heads stopped him getting his own way.

    • In what sense is my critique of Ofsted ‘ignorant’? It reflects a very widespread view among many great heads and teachers and senior civil servants expressed daily to DfE ministers. Perhaps it is wrong but it is not ‘ignorant’. My views on Cameron are based on personal interaction with him and his main advisers over many years.

      I don’t know where you get your ideas about my CV from but I worked in private sector including as an employer before, and between, involvement in political projects. It’s better to stick to real arguments rather than speculate about motives of individuals you do not know.

      Best wishes

    • My own sentiments entirely. Not necessarily that his intentions are not genuine, but his rudeness, knows no bounds. “Whack this, whack that.” Interstingly, “Correctomundo”, “Adios”… are terms I have seen elsewhere.. let me think? Must have been a different Twitter account. He needs to learn a little diplomacy, before he earns any respect from me. Obviously, a highly intelligent individual, but lacking in social skills. Whether you think he is right or wrong, there is no excuse for his blatant arrogance and rudeness. A fool to himself really.

  2. I don’t like some of the things thatDC has done, however, I have never heard that he has avoided an issue. He has valid points to make on Cameron and Clegg, afte all he worked closely with the. His views on MW are shared by lots of us who work in education. The man has toxic views and attitudes. The only right way is his way. Not all schools want to be a copy of Mossbourne, which under MW became an exam factory.