There is a division running rife through the Schools Week office and it’s not just which radio station we should play as we work.
It’s the split between those who attended school when corporal punishment was still possible, and those who cannot believe that there was ever such a thing.
This is because the answer to the pub quiz question “In what year did England ban smacking in state schools?” is 1986. Way later than many people realise. Especially if they started school in 1987.
England didn’t ban corporal punishment in the independent sector until 1999 – the year that Britney Spears first entered the UK charts
You may also have noticed the “state” school caveat there. England didn’t ban corporal punishment in the independent sector until 1999. Which, for the sake of context, was the year that Britney Spears first entered the UK charts and the euro was introduced.
Not everyone was happy about the situation, though. The heads of a number of Christian fellowship independent schools appealed, at length, through various courts, for the ability to have delegated authority from parents to physically punish their children should they wish.
A BBC report from 2005 says the heads claimed that boys would be hit using “a thin, broad flat paddle to both buttocks simultaneously in a firm controlled manner”. Meanwhile, “girls could be strapped on the hand and then comforted by a member of staff and encouraged to pray”.
That’s 2005, by the way. The year Tony Blair won a historic third general election for New Labour and England finally managed to regain The Ashes (which, ironically, they had last won just as the smacking ban was introduced).
In the end, the campaigners lost, with judges deciding that no human rights were being denied if teachers couldn’t whack kids upside the head. Or anywhere else (whether on hand with comfort blankets or not).
Still, 1986 may not sound so bad as a time for such a change. I mean, in the 1980s we were still smoking on planes and driving leaded cars. That’s just how things were, right?
Wrong. Poland banned corporal punishment in schools in 1783, something that is still enshrined in the country’s constitution. Finland followed suit in the late 1800s. Even the Soviet Union gave it up by 1917.
So why is England so hit-thirsty? It’s not that the issue was never brought to attention. Professor Michael Freeman, an expert in children’s law, has written on several occasions of his discovery of a petition from 1669, presented to parliament, by a “lively boy” who was aggrieved at the “severities of school discipline of this nation”.
One can only speculate if these days he would be made into a hero or villain by the tabloid press.
We also shouldn’t take for granted that people won’t try to overturn the ban. In 1987, a year after its prohibition, Warren Hawksley, then MP for Halesowen and Stourbridge tabled an amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill to bring back “whipping” for “offenders” (including those under 14).
His rationale was that on a visit to the Isle of Man, which had retained corporal punishment, he noticed tourists would jokingly say to the police that they wouldn’t cause any trouble.
“It worked on the Isle of Man and it would work here,” he claimed at one point, during his lengthy speech. Perhaps it would. But given everywhere else has coped without it for more than 100 years it was probably just as well that his amendment fell.
James Wilding
January 25, 2017 at 10:14 am
In my first month as headteacher in January 1981, HMI with responsibility for Independent schools visited the school to feel my collar. He checked the school boundary, to make sure I knew it was secure, he checked the admissions register to ensure I knew how to admit and depart pupils, he checked the daily attendance register to ensure I monitored absence and its causes, and he checked that I kept a punishment book (normal quarto exercise book, nothing fancy) and wrote in it the details of the child, the reason and the number of strokes with a cane I had administered at one sitting. I was advised never to hit a child more than 6 times at a visit.
HMI passed over to me an leaflet advertising the supply of school rattan canes – he made it quite clear I could not use a garden bamboo from the greenhouse. Caning rapidly reduced during my first three years, as I had to navigate through the expectations of teachers whose weekly spellings and homework defaults were supported by such punishments.
tracey Lucas
January 26, 2017 at 7:32 pm
I am a proud European but maybe this just goes to show that, sadly, we don’t deserve to be in the EU – we are a nation of barbarians! To truly put the tin lid on any ideas of european grandeur I might have had, my parents were both from the Isle of Man!! Still I’ll come in to my own, should the vikings stage another invasion!!
manxcat
February 5, 2019 at 11:04 pm
I and many of my friends where caned in school (in the isle of man) and now when I tell my children when I was your age I got caned for missing lessons or talking in class they look horrified. I now realise how wrong it was and how perverse the teachers giving the punishment where. I feel like making our government apologies for allowing this to go on so long. Especially after all the research into child abuse. I see the old teachers now and then and I can see the shame in their eye or it could be fear.
David Campbell
November 4, 2019 at 11:11 am
Corporal punishment should be brought back in some circumstances, but NEVER on hands! With the troubles with some pupils at some schools that you hear about on the News, the ‘namby pamby’ approach does not work with the really hard cases – female as well as male. Of course, such punishment should be used only as a last resort, and in the case of girls, not when they have their periods (but a week later in their cases). I was told of one Head who was so pathetic, he would say ‘Go away and sin no more’ but one boy was taken to the former Head who worked in the Junior School, who said the same thing, THEN gave the boy ‘6 of the very best’! That boy turned into one of the nicest young men I met at that school!
DKC