News

Study suggests iGCSEs are ‘easier’ than reformed GCSEs

Controversial international GCSEs used disproportionately by private schools are “easier” than new reformed GCSEs, a new study suggests.

Research published by Education DataLab, based on information from the National Pupil Database, shows that iGCSEs are “not graded quite as severely” as reformed GCSEs, making it easier for pupils to reach top grades.

It follows a fierce debate over the qualifications sparked by data which shows the extent to which iGCSEs are preferred by non-state schools.

iGCSEs no longer count in school performance tables for state schools in subjects where a reformed GCSE has been introduced, effectively barring state schools from using the qualifications.

However, government data released to the former shadow education secretary Lucy Powell shows many private schools continue to opt for iGCSEs, prompting calls from the Labour party for a government inquiry into the issue.

A spokesperson for the Department for Education accepted that “international GCSEs have not been through the same regulatory approval and quality control as the reformed GCSEs”, but would not comment on whether the government had plans to do anything about the disparity.

Although many reformed GCSEs no longer have coursework elements and instead focus on a final set of exams, iGCSEs still include a mixture of exams, coursework and practical assessments.

Two in three achieve top iGCSE grades

DataLab’s research, carried out by Dave Thomson, found two thirds of pupils achieved a grade A* or A in maths and English language iGCSEs in 2017, while between 18 and 20 per cent achieved the equivalent grades of 9 to 7 in reformed GCSEs.

Although he accepted that attainment “tends to be higher” in private schools, Thomson explored whether there would still be such a disparity if those who took iGCSEs had taken the reformed qualifications instead.

Researchers compared iGCSE English and maths results alongside pupils’ results in a legacy GCSE qualification also taken in the summer of 2017.

This revealed that more A* and A grades were awarded in English and maths iGCSEs than expected based on performance in  legacy qualifications, but were in line with expectations for the reformed GCSEs.

There were also “slightly more” A* to C grades awarded in both subjects at iGCSE than expected.

Thomson concluded that “perhaps iGCSEs are indeed not graded quite as severely as reformed GCSEs”, though he did say further work was needed.

Private schools ‘not gaming system’

However, Neil Roskilly, chief executive of the Independent Schools Association, disputed this conclusion and insisted there was “no research to suggest that iGCSEs have a lower cognitive demand than reformed GCSEs”.

“Most state schools have been forced down a narrowing curriculum pathway by the Ebacc performance measure, but independent schools would rather assess the suitability of the new GCSEs before deciding on any wholesale change,” he said.

“It comes down to private schools making decisions on specifications and content, in the best interests of their pupils, and not being so driven by narrow accountability measures. That’s not gaming the system.”

Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said it was “manifestly unfair” that state schools were no longer able to take iGCSEs.

“The research from Education DataLab provides more cause for concern and it is of paramount importance that Ofqual ensures the new reformed GCSEs are not graded more severely than equivalent qualifications,” he added.

“The unfairness is that the government has shifted the goalposts for state schools having previously encouraged them to teach iGCSEs.”

Labour: We need a review

According to the Guardian,  91 per cent of iGCSE entries in EBacc subjects came from independent schools. iGCSEs made up 13.6 per cent of all independent school EBacc subject entries, compared to 0.1 per cent of state-funded schools.

Angela Rayner, the shadow education secretary, said: “We cannot have an education system with different rules for the privileged few. It is totally wrong that Tory reforms are putting state school pupils at a disadvantage compared to their counterparts who can afford a private education.

“We urgently need to get to the bottom of this situation. A full, root-and-branch review of Tory reforms to qualifications and their impact on pupils is needed.”



Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 Comments

  1. Anne Brown

    Please may I introduce you to the elephant in the room?

    Pupils at private schools have smaller classes, more resources, are selected and benefit from taking qualifications that aren’t changed every time the wind changes. Teachers have less paperwork and more autonomy and parents are paying for education so are more likely to ensure that their little darling actually does some work.

    Is it not possible that pupils with all these advantages will gain higher grades than pupils in state schools? Apparently not, so the view is that the exams must be easier than these wonderful new GCSE exams. And who’s analysing them to say they’re wonderful? Our beloved and entirely trustworthy government.

    • Wake up. The private schools ARE gaming the system. I am tutoring a pupil whose school (private) has decided very late in the day to change from reformed GCSE to iGCSE, in maths. Now why do you think that is? I know (not employed by any gov department) because I can see them both and make informed unbiased judgements. The reformed GCSE maths is a very challenging exam, be in no doubt, but what’s wrong with that exactly?

  2. I work with lower ability students, ones who will not achieve their potential by having to study for two years and then sit 100% exams. iGCSE works for them as they can still complete practical and coursework elements. And they gain a GCSE grade that they would not be able to achieve under the reformed GCSE’s.

    The government needs to stop deciding that “one size fits all” when it comes to qualifications and from changing them every other year so that the students have a fighting chance of achieving their potential.

    Some children work better practically, some via a mixture of coursework and exams and some love exams. Anyone who has ever taught a child knows this! Why cant we play to the strengths of the children we teach???

  3. I completely agree with the previous comment. I am a History teacher and have seen the specification and markschemes for both the iGCSE and the reformed 9-1. There is no comparison, the 9-1 is far harder. When the universities and employers wake up to this double standard then state school kids with a good set of GCSEs will have a far better qualification. While the two qualifications are considered ‘equal’ the system is stacked in favour of those who can pay for education. If I was a parent paying for private education I would be furios about this.

    • If the exams are easier, would that not make the grade boundaries higher? I thought that no matter how hard or easy the test is the average grade is always a C. Or a 4-5 in the new system.