News

Spending review to include measures to reduce school back-office spending

Chancellor George Osborne will use the autumn spending review to “improve productivity” in schools as back-office services are targeted in a bid to save money.

In its spending review document, which sets out plans for a further £20m of departmental savings, the Treasury has re-affirmed the government’s commitment to protecting per-pupil funding for schools, but said there was “significant scope” for institutions to increase efficiency and productivity.

Building on measures announced in the budget in March, the document highlights that secondary school spending on back-office costs ranges from £202 to £1,432 per pupil, and “between 2003 and 2013, back-office spending per pupil in maintained schools increased by around 60 per cent in real terms”.

It goes on to say: “The government will support schools to improve productivity and maximise expenditure on improving children’s education, including through the spending review process.

“The government will also make schools funding fairer and focus efforts to support school improvement in underperforming areas, including coastal areas, encouraging the best academy chains to expand and bringing new sponsors where needed.”

It is not yet known how the government will use the spending review to reduce back-office expenditure, but Unison’s head of education and children’s services Jon Richards has warned the Chancellor against thinking the government can “keep saving money on back-office”.

Mr Richards told Schools Week: “There is this great fantasy out there that you can always keep making these savings. There are all sorts of things they try, like outsourcing and sharing resources, but often this great promise of savings doesn’t happen.

“Often it is a staffing issue, and I have no problem with the idea of looking at why some schools are spending more than others, although often it depends on what those staff are doing, for example if there is a large number of free school meals children that creates a burden.

“It’s not always simple as people think it is, especially as often when you’re getting rid of support staff you’re creating work for other people, and it’s often teachers.”

Mr Osborne said: “This spending review is the next step in our plan to eliminate the deficit, run a surplus and ensure Britain lives within its means.

“We’ll invest in our priorities like the NHS and national security. Elsewhere in government, departments will have to find significant savings through efficiencies and by devolving power, so people have a greater say over the issues that affect them and their communities. We’ll deliver more with less.

“The spending review will be set out on November 25. Creating a strong and stable economy is the best way to support working people.”

Picture: Yui Mok/PA Wire/Press Association Images

Latest education roles from

Biology GCSE Tutor (Variable Hours)

Biology GCSE Tutor (Variable Hours)

Richmond and Hillcroft Adult & Community College

Work Experience Support Assistant

Work Experience Support Assistant

Bournemouth and Poole College

EHCP & SEND Administrator

EHCP & SEND Administrator

Bournemouth and Poole College

Director of Governance

Director of Governance

Stanmore College

Lecturer in Policing and Public Services

Lecturer in Policing and Public Services

West Suffolk College

Part Time Variable Hours Tutor of Construction and the Built Environment

Part Time Variable Hours Tutor of Construction and the Built Environment

York College

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 Comments

  1. Tubby Isaacs

    Can we find out what “back office” was in 2010?

    Only, I’ll venture it shot up a lot per pupils after hundreds of thousands of them were removed from their LAs.

  2. Tubby Isaacs

    Can we find out what “back office” was in 2010?

    Only, I’ll venture it shot up a lot per pupils after hundreds of thousands of them were removed from their LAs.

  3. Angela Edlin

    Cambridgeshire schools already receive £100 less per pupil each year than other areas. In practice this means that some departments run out of paper for students to write on by May, some schools do not have enough money to deliver their SEN obligations and some rely on cake sales run by the PTA to pay for literacy software. There are more people in employment in Cambridgeshire so more parents pay tax but less is spent on their children. Is this fair?