Ofsted

Some Ofsted reports will seem more positive without headline grades

Three in five schools rated ‘requires improvement’ last year had two or more ‘good’ sub-grades

Three in five schools rated ‘requires improvement’ last year had two or more ‘good’ sub-grades

Exclusive

Three in five schools rated ‘requires improvement’ last year had two or more ‘good’ or better sub-grades, suggesting some parents will see a more positive overall picture of their child’s school now that headline Ofsted grades have been scrapped.

This week, the government scrapped overall effectiveness grades for state schools with immediate effect, ahead of a move to introduce a new system of report cards next September.

Ofsted will continue to give schools grades for four sub-judgments, including quality of education and leadership and management.

Analysts at FFT Education Datalab looked at the 3,660 inspection reports published in 2023-24 to compare the four sub-judgment grades with the now scrapped grade for overall effectiveness.

Nearly all ‘outstanding’ schools had the same grade in the four judgements. This was 70 per cent for ‘good’ schools – suggesting the remaining 30 per cent had ‘outstanding’ features.

But this was more variable for ‘requires improvement’ (20 per cent) and ‘inadequate’ (25 per cent) schools.

Under the 2019 inspection framework, which remains in force but without headline grades, a school is rated ‘inadequate’ if any of the four judgments are given that lowest grade.

It’s also “likely” that if a school receives a ‘requires improvement’ grade for any of the sub-judgments, then its overall effectiveness would be rated at that level.

RI schools more likely to have ‘good’ features

Of the schools rated RI overall last year, Datalab found 62 per cent were rated ‘good’ or better for at least two of the sub-judgments. This was just 8 per cent for inadequate schools.

Analysts said: “Anyone looking at sub-judgments for a school judged RI overall will be faced with a variable set of sub-judgments. Perhaps that’s better than a single overall headline.”

John Jerrim, UCL Institute of Education professor, said these schools “will indeed look better to most people”. For instance, “lots of parents will assume that three ‘goods’ means it’s ‘good’ overall currently, but that’s not the case”.

It shows the Department for Education “have not really changed anything substantive yet to be honest. It’s really a political change – a tickbox off a manifesto pledge – more than anything else.”

However, he said the number of RI schools is “pretty small” so the absolute number actually impacted by “this nuance is going to be pretty small”.

Will ‘OGGO’ become the new banner headline?

Schools with positive Ofsted grades commonly tout them on banners and websites.

History teacher Tom Rogers said he hoped school “brags don’t go from ‘we are outstanding’ to ‘we are OGGO in sub categories (outstanding, good, good, outstanding) or ‘we are mostly outstanding’”.

“I honestly think all grades need to go. It needs to be commentary in a report and that’s it.”

For instance, an inspection report was published this week for The Pastures Primary School in Leicester.

It was rated ‘good’ overall in June, but broken down it received “good, outstanding, outstanding, good”.

As the school was inspected last academic year, it has still received an overall effectiveness grade. If the school was inspected this year, it would instead just get the four sub-grades.

Tories say change removes ‘vital’ parent info

Damian Hinds, the shadow education secretary, warned the change “removes a vital piece of info for parents but adds none. Ofsted already assesses and grades four key areas and gives narrative. Ofsted reports are typically 1,400 words; they are not one word.”

The government’s move to these sub-judgments has also reignited debates on how reliable Ofsted grades are. UCL research last year cast doubt on the reliability of ‘inadequate’ judgments, depending on who the inspector was.

Stephen Tierney, a former headteacher, said: “We need to be assured that the grades given to a school are essentially independent of the particular inspectors who assessed the school and the timing of the visit.

“Arguably, if we continue using sub grades in reports, then reports should read something like this: ‘The Quality of Education is graded 2, it is a good, and we are confident that it sits somewhere in the range 1-3 (outstanding to requires improvement). The inspectors are reasonably confident it is not inadequate’.

“Alternatively, we could ask Ofsted inspectors to provide a nuanced narrative based report and provide supporting statistical data alongside it.”

Latest education roles from

Chief Education Officer (Deputy CEO)

Chief Education Officer (Deputy CEO)

Romero Catholic Academy Trust

Director of Academy Finance and Operations

Director of Academy Finance and Operations

Ormiston Academies Trust

Principal & Chief Executive

Principal & Chief Executive

Truro & Penwith College

Group Director of Marketing, Communications & External Engagement

Group Director of Marketing, Communications & External Engagement

London & South East Education Group

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

AI Safety: From DfE Guidance to Classroom Confidence

Darren Coxon, edtech consultant and AI education specialist, working with The National College, explores the DfE’s expectations for AI...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

How accurate spend information is helping schools identify savings

One the biggest issues schools face when it comes to saving money on everyday purchases is a lack of...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Building Character, Increasing Engagement and Growing Leaders: A Whole School Approach

Research increasingly shows that character education is just as important as academic achievement in shaping pupils’ long-term success. Studies...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Educators launch national AI framework to guide schools and colleges

More than 250 schools and colleges across the UK have already enrolled in AiEd Certified, a new certification framework...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Ofsted

ASCL joins Ofsted preparation ‘cottage industry’ it once criticised

Watchdog urges schools not to 'spend limited resources' on preparing for inspection after union launches paid-for webinars

John Dickens
Ofsted

‘No real subject inspection left’: Spielman slams Ofsted reforms

Report cards will 'take out everything that amounts to a serious review of what's taught and how it's taught',...

Freddie Whittaker
Ofsted

Union tells school leaders to demand Ofsted risk assessment

NAHT says move is about ‘preventing avoidable harm – including the most serious outcomes – arising from a flawed...

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

Schools more positive about Ofsted inspections as headline grades ditched

But analysis shows those taking part in survey are more likely to have had positive Ofsted outcomes

Lydia Chantler-Hicks

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. Neil Fazackerley

    Instead of this mixed up policy, could they not have just written: “This setting meets / does not meet national standards for quality of education.”? They could then write a report under the 4 headings and give the areas for improvement. Maybe even a comment such as “This school requires further support.” Ofsted could then monitor the schools where they have said they require further support.