School with £1.3m debt now faces closure over inadequate Ofsted


An academy that racked up a £1.3 million deficit last year is now facing closure, but only after the government stepped in over an “inadequate” Ofsted.

The Education Fellowship Trust (EFT) has been issued with a termination warning notice for Wrenn school in Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, by Martin Post, the regional schools commissioner for north-west London and south-central .

The school was rated “inadequate” in October after Ofsted noted issues with pupil achievement.

However just one category, outcomes for pupils, was rated inadequate. The other four were all requires improvement.

Yet in a letter sent to trust chair Rachel Mallows in early December, Post highlighted the “serious weaknesses” and said there needed to be “significant improvement” or the school’s funding agreement could be terminated.

EFT’s annual accounts for 2015-16, published this week, show the 1,100-pupil secondary posted a £1.3 million deficit last year, nearly four times the £363,000 average deficit for secondary academies in the red.

EFT said the trust took on the school when it already had a “considerable deficit”

In its accounts EFT said the trust took on the school when it already had a “considerable deficit”.

It said the Education Funding Agency (EFA) initially asked it to fund the deficit from its central funds, but then realised this would “have an impact on the overall position of the trust. This matter was raised again during the year with the EFA and were [sic] advised by the deputy director that there was no additional funding to support this position.”

The accounts show that five of the trust’s 12 schools posted a deficit last year. In 2015, EFT spent £268,000 on redundancy and severance payment costs, with another £69,000 last year.

The number of full-time equivalent teachers across the trust’s schools fell from 352 in 2015, to 332 last year. Admin staff fell from 371 to 333, in the same period, although the number of management staff rose from four to 11.

Budget pressures look set to worsen after an analysis published this week by six education unions found that 98 per cent of schools in England face a real-terms reduction in per-pupil funding under the new funding formula.

Separate analysis published on the School Cuts website, run by education unions, predicts Wrenn school faces losing an extra £412,339 from its budget by 2019.

EFT has been under the scrutiny of the EFA in recent years.

It was told by the agency in September to close a linked commercial company. The government said the trust’s organisational model was “not acceptable”, and questioned its relationship with the private company The Education Fellowship Ltd, which at the time owned the chain.

The trust chief operating officer Lizzie Rowe insisted the structure had been approved by the Department for Education (DfE) in 2012 and 2014, and questioned the use of public funds for such an investigation.

A separate EFA investigation in 2014 highlighted concerns over governors’ expenses of £45,000, including for a fact-finding trip to New York.

The trust did not respond for comment, while a DfE spokesperson said that Post was “continuing to work with the trust to ensure action to address the concerns raised is being taken”.

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


  1. Michael Duggins

    Could you possibly read all the evidence and paperwork involved in this BEFORE a write up like this? No, the school is NOT under threat of closure. The school appears to be doing considerably well despite everything regarding The Education Fellowship. The threat is that they will be taken away from The Education Fellowship, which would probably be the best possible outcome.

  2. Mark Watson

    Another hopelessly sensationalist headline that gets it all wrong. As the first post above points out, there is no scenario put forward where the school would face closure. As the article says the threat is that EFT’s funding agreement could be terminated at which point the academy would presumably be rebrokered to another MAT. Is this distortion of the situation intentional or because the authors don’t understand the difference ?
    The article then goes on to simply lift various bits out of EFT’s published accounts. Why not do some journalism to provide context to the story? The accounts talk about how EFT took on Wren Academy with “a considerable deficit”, but surely the question is what this deficit was and how it compares to the current deficit of £1.3 million. Without this information it is not possible to understand how EFT has performed financially.
    The article ends with yet another inaccuracy – “A separate EFA investigation in 2014 highlighted concerns over governors’ expenses of £45,000, including for a fact-finding trip to New York”. Did the authors actually read the EFA investigation? I did. The so called ‘fact-finding trip to New York’ was nothing to do with governors’ expenses and seems to have been for staff. I’m not saying this makes it acceptable (indeed I think it’s far from acceptable) but is it too much to ask that SchoolsWeek actually reports the facts?