Researcher: A private tutoring tax ‘would level grammar school playing field’

A leading education researcher wants a new tax on private tutoring services, to help “level the playing field” for lower-income pupils trying to get into grammar schools.

Such a tax would be particularly vital to counteract parents who use private tutors to “coach” children for the 11-plus entrance test, said Professor John Jerrim of the UCL Institute of Education.

High-income families are much more likely to use private tutors to prepare their child for the grammar school entrance test than low-income families are, Jerrim found in a study co-authored by Sam Sims and funded by the Nuffield Foundation.

Children who receive private tutoring are five times more likely to get into grammar schools than those who do not get extra help.

Jerrim wants to use the proceeds from a tax to to pay for vouchers for low- and middle-income families, “providing them with subsidised or even free private tuition”.

He investigated 1,800 children from areas of England which still have grammars, and found that 70 per cent of those who received tutoring got a place, compared to just 14 per cent of those who were not tutored.

Less than 10 per cent of children from families with below-average incomes had coaching for the entrance test, compared to around 30 per cent of children from households in the top quartile of family income.

Children from families in the bottom quartile of household incomes in England have less than a 10-per-cent chance of attending a grammar . This rises to around a 40-per-cent chance for children in the top quartile of household incomes.

Access to grammar schools is far from meritocratic

His analysis was based upon the UK’s millennium cohort study, which followed 1,039 children from Northern Ireland and 819 children from England from the age of nine months until they were 14.

It took into account factors including family income, prior academic achievement, private tutoring and parental attitudes and aspirations.

“Access to grammar schools is far from meritocratic, and is determined by much more than academic ability alone,” he concluded. He now wants the government to tackle private tutoring before it allows existing grammar schools to expand.

In February, Schools Week reported that grammar schools could be able to expand and take on extra pupils as soon as 2020 if long-awaited funding is made available by new education secretary Damian Hinds.

“The government claims that expanding grammars will boost social mobility. But our research shows that private tuition used by high-income families gives them a big advantage in getting in,” Professor Jerrim said.

“The government therefore needs to explain how they are going to level the playing field between different income groups.”

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Eve Sacks

    Stupid idea. So many people pay their tutors in cash. And most tutoring not for grammar schools but at other points GCSEs.

    Much better idea would be for all grammar schools to have a target number of free school meals and pupil premium children, and a separate category in the admissions policy. These children would need to obtain a lower mark.

    Another idea would be for exact primary school near the grammar school to nominate bright free school meals / pupil premium children for admission to grammar school and they could get a place without the 11+.

  2. Mark Watson

    Typical ivory-tower academic considering an issue in isolation with no context and no idea how things work in real life.
    I agree with Eve’s comments above -I would think that the percentage of high-income parents using private tutoring to coach little Tarquin for the 11+ is dwarfed by the amount of usage by parents wanting a little extra support in a specific subject, catch-up teaching, GCSE/A-Level support and most obviously parents who are home-educating.
    Don’t disagree with the principle that there ought to be a more level playing field – I don’t know if it’s actually possible but I liked the sound of making the 11+ “an exam that can’t be tutored” – but this taxation idea is bonkers.