researchED: Evidence will ‘liberate’ teachers – Gibb

Nick Gibb, the Minister for School Reform, today told an audience of teachers, academics and policymakers that evidence was set to “liberate the teaching profession”.

Speaking at the researchED conference, Mr Gibb said that the Government had carried out a number of measures to free teachers from bureaucracy and “put evidence right at the heart of education”.

Government guidance to schools had been cut by three quarters, while at the same time more data about schools had been made available to researchers.

Teachers were now the ones transforming their schools, he said – helped by the fact that the Government had allowed ambitious teachers to set up free schools.

Schools Direct was another way in which the Government was granting schools more autonomy, Mr Gibb said.

Schools Minister Nick Gibb, delivering his session at researchED 2014
Schools Minister Nick Gibb, delivering his session at researchED 2014

Asked about the Government’s support for phonics teaching, Mr Gibb defended this as consistent with a drive to greater autonomy and to allowing teachers to make their own decisions based on evidence, saying that the manner in which phonics was taught would be left up to individual schools and teachers.

On the subject of teaching methods, he made clear that he favoured a direct instructional approach, but said that he was not going to dictate to schools that they needed to follow this route. Greater autonomy for schools was a feature that the OECD had identified among the best-performing countries.

When asked about the role of multi-academy trusts, Mr Gibb said that he expected to see “huge changes” in future, and suggested that consolidation of schools into large trusts was likely to continue.

“They are competing now for reputation,” he said, adding that academies they would increasingly look to adopt the methods used by the most successful chains.

Speaking before Mr Gibb,  shadow education secretary Tristram Hunt said that it was events such as researchED that made him optimistic about the future of education in the UK.

In a speech back in March, Mr Hunt argued that Government would have to play a role in boosting the infrastructure through which education evidence and research was disseminated.

However, he said that while he still believed the state a role to play, he had not appreciated sufficiently what was already being done at the grassroots.

“I think that even then I failed to realise the scale of what is already happening in the profession,” he said. “Now a year into this job I am in absolutely no doubt whatsoever.”

Some areas of the country were at a more advanced stage in embedding a culture of continuous development, though. “I think we have to be frank and say that however encouraging is the movement for improving teacher quality it is also in many parts of the country, particularly outside London, clearly embryonic,” he said.

The Shadow Education Secretary, Tristram Hunt, speaking at researchED
The Shadow Education Secretary, Tristram Hunt, speaking at researchED

He said that he was not the type of politician who would tell teachers how to do their job, and set out his view that there needed to be a move away from a “top-down”, “managerial” culture in education.

Mr Hunt also set out his case for revalidation of teaching qualifications, saying that this represented the way to bring education into line with other “high-status, mature professions”.

Labour was currently working with the Royal Society of Arts on “fleshing out” its revalidation policy. Mr Hunt also said that Labour thought a Royal College of Teaching should have a role in revalidation – and suggested that associations such as the Royal Society of Chemistry could play a part too.

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


  1. Janet Downs

    Gibb’s idea of evidence is blinkered. He says, for example, that systematic teaching of synthetic phonics is supported by international evidence. But this evidence supports the systematic teaching of any method of teaching phonics. He says it’s up to teachers how they teach (synthetic) phonics but the matched funding he set up including training for teaching synthetic phonics.

    And he, like Gove, used the flawed OECD data for the year 2000 to show the UK had ‘plummeted’ down league tables despite the OECD saying the figures shouldn’t be used for comparison.

  2. This is warmed up blob-think, pace Gove. And quote a professor to rubbish the academic establishment: why should we pay attention to him – because he’s a professor?? Another aspect of this incredibly ideologically driven regime we have. It’s like putting policy in the hands of the Daily Mail: ignore the academics and their research, but instead ask the front line staff member [preferably selectively]…”hitting them always worked for me!”
    Effective education is so complex and so hard to measure. This is why it is so important to look thoroughly at the research data across the board – not the kind of selective readings we get so often from DfE wonks. If this country has any economic future we need to be mighty creative, and our education system should focus on that rather than on cramming for exams. We have already invented computers to number crunch; we need future generations to think. What system prepares them best for that?