SPEED-READ: Our 6-point guide to the National Funding Formula consultation

Education secretary Nicky Morgan has launched the first of two consultations that will shape an “historic” national funding formula.

Ms Morgan said the plans will end historical inequalities in the funding system leading to schools in some part of the country receiving £2,000-per pupil more than others.

The consultation sets out the foundations for the formula’s proposals and will run until April 17.

A second consultation will be launched later in the year and reveal how the factors will impact individual areas and schools.

So what are the main points?


1.  What is the government proposing?


School funding will be delivered by a national funding formula from next September. Funds will be given to local authorities to distribute for the first two years. It will be directly allocated to schools from 2019-20.

The formula will be made up of four building blocks: per-pupil costs, additional needs costs; school costs; and geographic costs. (These are covered in more detail on page 9)


2. The new formula will be eased in


Transition to the “hard” national funding formula will be phased in over two years. This means the government will use the new formula to create budgets for schools within each authority, before handing over the cash to local authorities to hand out. They can then reapportion based on a local funding formula, if they wish.

By 2018, local authorities will be required to pass on all of the funding allocated through the schools block to their local schools.

Authorities will also be given “greater flexibility” in setting a minimum funding guarantee to “reflect local circumstances”.


3.  Limiting the impact on winners and losers


The government has been clear there will be “winners and losers”.

To smooth this it will continue a “minimum funding guarantee (MFG)”. The current MFG means schools can’t lose more than 1.5 per cent of their funding per pupil, per year. A future MFG level has not yet been set. (It will later become a national guarantee and more details will be included in consultation two).

The department is also proposing a cap on gains. So the amount distributed to “gainers” will be balanced by the amount schools will be allowed to lose in a single year.

An “invest to save fund” will also be set up this year to help schools that lose out. It will be available for schools to use how they wish, including for financial, legal and HR advice.

The document states that in “extreme cases” funds can go towards “the costs of restructuring a school’s workforce” – essentially: redundancies.

Jonathan Simons, head of education at think tank Policy Exchange, said he was struck by the explicit reference to redundancies, but said the pot of cash is “necessary and an important thing to do”.


4.  The end of local authorities


Arguably the biggest loser in the consultation is local authorities. The government states some will receive less cash in 2017, but they still have to set a formula so no school can lose more than the 1.5 per cent per pupil.

The consultation reads: “For losing authorities, this would leave them with very little room for manoeuvre.”

One of the proposals to mitigate this is to allow authorities to set local minimum funding guarantees that allow for greater losses.

The government has also told councils to step back from running school improvement and responsibilities such as behaviour support and insurance now rest with an individual school.

They have a choice whether to buy the service in from the council or use an alternative provider.

The government has said it plans to provide funding to support the delivery of a new improvement strategy – which will be more school-led. This plan will be revealed in the white paper due before Parliament in the coming weeks.

Local authorities will have most of their duties removed – leaving just three main ones. They will be expected to make sure there are enough school places available, ensure the needs of vulnerable pupils are met and act as a champion for parents.

The government is proposing to amend regulations so local authorities can retain some of their maintained school’s dedicated schools grant to fund the duties they carry out for maintained schools.


5.  Factors left out


The DfE is proposing to use 11 of the 14 factors currently used in local funding formulae. Those not included are looked-after children, mobility and post-16.


6.  What next?


The race is now on. The second consultation, which will run for six or seven weeks, has been rumoured to be published in May so the final details of the formula could be before Parliament by the end of June – before the summer recess.

But Natalie Perera, former head of school funding reform at the Department for Education (DfE), said, has said these time scales are “extraordinarily challenging”.


Latest education roles from

Procurement Officer

Procurement Officer

RNN Group

Director of Marketing and Student Recruitment

Director of Marketing and Student Recruitment

Barnet and Southgate College

Professional Practice (TLA) Lead

Professional Practice (TLA) Lead

RNN Group

Health & Care Coordinator

Health & Care Coordinator

MidKent College

HR Assistant

HR Assistant

MidKent College

Principal, Cedar Mount Academy Bright Futures Educational Trust

Principal, Cedar Mount Academy Bright Futures Educational Trust

Satis Education

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. John Briggs

    Will this impact on duscretionary school transoort provision – in Lincolnshire the County Council funds transport to Grammar Schools for 75% of residents & the other 25%have to pay upto £1000 yr

  2. Alistair Thomas

    Government overs sells and under delivers once more.

    As recently as November we were promised a consultation on a national formula for Early Years, Schools and High Needs – all three blocks of the current DSG. We were also promised a consultation on the proposed near complete withdrawal of education services.

    I actually approve of splitting the consultation up into two. With such a wide ranging debate, it’s eminently sensible to discuss the principles first; not least, if there is a chance for well-funded and poorly-funded to agree on anything, it will be around principles.

    In a discussion about principles, there is no reason why the scope cannot be broad. We had even hoped that Post 16 might join the debate since all parts of education should participate in a discussion about a funding framework for all 0-19 education.

    A narrow-focused consultation on the principles of just the schools block is a poor delivery against the original promise let alone this wider debate. There’s no real consultation on services either except an assumption that the withdrawal of services is accepted and its now only the extent that is up for debate. Any notion that services have the potential to serve all phases of education is missed through the narrow focus.

    Finally, it’s hard to see the short timescale of the debate as anything other than a cynical attempt to push through proposals without due consideration. Nominally it’s 6 weeks but two of those are over Easter, and since this is a funding debate, it can’t be beyond the governments perception that many schools are busy finalising their budgets.

    What a pity that the introduction of such a fantastic concept as fair funding is managed so poorly and insensitively. After waiting so many years, why the ridiculous rush now and why the limitations on what can and can’t be discussed?