News

Ofsted should shout louder against 3-year GCSEs, says boss of largest academy trust

edtech demonstrator
Exclusive


Ofsted should be more vocal in challenging schools that narrow the curriculum with three-year GCSEs, the head of England’s largest academy trust has said.

Writing in Schools Week, Sir Jon Coles, chief executive of United Learning, said Ofsted was “doing the right thing” and should do so “more full-throatedly”.

Ofsted is now finally doing the right thing in challenging the three-year key stage 4

He said good schools “teach the full range of subjects up to age 14, keep their curriculum broad and protect children’s access to learning against exam pressures”.

Coles also hit back at claims by other academy chiefs that Ofsted’s approach disadvantages schools teaching poorer pupils, insisting that it is those pupils “who most need schools to inject cultural wealth into their lives”.

School leaders claim they have been penalised for running three-year GCSEs.

But the watchdog has stood firm, and insists schools can still be rated ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ and have a three-year GCSE, as long as pupils still learn a broad curriculum until the end of year 9.

Although he accepted that exam results matter for children, Coles said they “can become an unhealthy obsession”, and warned that “educationally dubious practices” have become “contagious diseases”.

“So, the case for regulation is overwhelming, and Ofsted – having exhausted all other possibilities – is now finally doing the right thing in challenging the three-year key stage 4. It should do so more full-throatedly.

“They do so not in the interests of the middle classes, but most importantly for the poor and the dispossessed.”

Coles, whose academy trust now has 72 schools, said England was an “absolute outlier” in its approach to curriculum breadth.

“No similar country allows young people to opt out as early as we do from learning about the nature of our planet, how human, social and political structures came to be as they are, or how to communicate in another language.”

Earlier this week, Amanda Spielman defied critics of Ofsted’s embattled new inspection regime, insisting her organisation “won’t turn a blind eye to schools narrowing education”.

The chief inspector used her speech at the annual Ofsted report launch on Tuesday to go on the offensive following heavy criticism of the new framework.

Ofsted chief inspector Amanda Spielman

She also slapped down claims that schools were being penalised solely for the length of their key stages, and said Ofsted judgments were based on the “totality” of a school’s approach.

“I’ve looked at some of the inspection reports where people have said ‘we were marked down for a two-year key stage 3’. The report itself makes blindingly clear that that isn’t the case, that there is a broader set of issues that have been uncovered in the inspection,” she said.

“So, it’s really important that we don’t slide into this narrow characterisation.”

Paul Whiteman, the general secretary of the NAHT leaders’ union, said the report showed “a high-performing system under immense strain”.

He said schools needed policy, accountability measures, inspection and improvement support to be “properly aligned”.

The watchdog also issued a warning about “settings we cannot see”, such as illegal schools, and again pushed for more enforcement powers.

“Our blindspots are caused by weak legislation, weak powers and weak enforcement,” the report concluded.



Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. Dr Debbie Hawker

    I would like to hear Sir Jon Coles’ comments about the mental health of school pupils (especially less advantaged pupils) in connection with these issues.

    Making choices can benefit mental health. It is commonly reported that pupils feel happier after being able to choose which subjects they will continue to study.

    I am a clinical psychologist with over 25 years experience. I provide therapy for teenagers and teachers, and I supervise school counsellors. I have been concerned by the mental health impact of schools feeling under pressure to move from a three-year to a two-year KS4. The stress this causes students can lead to increased depression, anxiety, self-harm, eating disorders, suicide attempts and other mental health symptoms.

    Year 9 students in a 3-year KS3 can show an increase in anxiety and depression when they have to continue in subjects which they are struggling with instead of being allowed to choose options (e.g. students with dyslexia or a language-based learning disability who are unable to drop a foreign language; students with dyspraxia who have to continue with Art or Technology despite having very poor coordination etc). School refusal and bullying may also increase among Year 9 students unable to choose their preferred options to study, as students disengage from subjects which they have already decided to drop.

    Currently, CAMHS services have very long waiting lists and many young people are not unable to access mental health services. Mental health must be considered when making decisions about young people.

  2. Alison Kemp

    I have very mixed feelings about the narrowing of the curriculum to cater for 3 year GCSEs. My own understanding, gained through my daughter’s KS4 experience was that her curriculum narrowed but that her choices ensured that she still had a broad range of subjects – MFL, Geography, Art etc. However, what should have been a clear A* in German for example was gradually eroded away through lack of teaching because the teacher’s time was taken up in ‘training’ those students who need continual practice in learning their ‘script’ for their German oral exam which they repeated many times over the course of the years. Meanwhile able students were given ‘vocabulary learning’ and self guided tasks to complete for the best part of 3 years. All most unsatisfactory and she ended up with a B because she was completely turned off the subject.