Ofsted

Ofsted ‘not fit for purpose’, finds ‘alternative big listen’

Organisers of sector-led survey say inspectorate facing ‘existential crisis’

Organisers of sector-led survey say inspectorate facing ‘existential crisis’

The “alternative big listen” survey compiled to rival a formal Ofsted consultation on future reforms has revealed widespread dissatisfaction with the watchdog, with nine in 10 respondents deeming it “not fit for purpose”.

Frank Norris and Colin Richards – former inspectors who launched the consultation in May because they did not believe the official poll asked the key questions needed – said Ofsted is “facing an existential crisis”.

Sir Martyn Oliver launched the official Big Listen as part of a raft of measures in response to an inquest last year, which ruled an Ofsted inspection had contributed to the suicide of headteacher Ruth Perry.

Ofsted was widely criticised after its own consultation did not include a specific question on whether single-phrase judgments should be scrapped.

Respondents were able to talk about judgments in free text response fields, but critics said the watchdog had dodged asking about what many see as the fundamental flaw to inspection.

Ofsted ‘does not consider context’

The alternative big listen, though a self-selecting survey whose 1,368 responses have not been weighted to be representative of the sector, shows Ofsted has a mountain to climb to regain trust.

Ninety-one per cent of respondents said the watchdog should not use one or two-word judgments to characterise the overall effectiveness of schools.

Eighty-nine per cent said Ofsted did not sufficiently consider the context of schools’ local areas when reaching judgments.

Ninety per cent said inspections were not consistent from place to place, and 85 per cent disagreed that the number of schools rated ‘good’ or better gave a strong indication of the overall quality of the school system.

There should be a moratorium on routine inspections until a “fundamental review” has taken place, according to 83 per cent of respondents.

Ofsted faces ‘existential crisis’

The consultation’s organisers said it was “clear that Ofsted is facing an existential crisis – whether to engage in piecemeal change, to be fundamentally reformed or to be replaced altogether”.

“Our findings imply that the first of these is no longer a viable option.”

Frank Norris
Frank Norris

They urged the new education secretary Bridget Phillipson, who has committed to scrapping single-phrase judgments, and Oliver to “take note of our findings and to take urgent principled action to reform the current school inspection regime”.

Sixty-seven per cent of respondents said Ofsted doesn’t hold schools “properly to account” for the quality of education they provide. Thirty-nine per cent said Ofsted did not hold schools properly to account for keeping children safe.

Norris said the survey “offers a damning critique of Ofsted and clearly demonstrates the amount of work the inspectorate needs to do in order to re-establish confidence in the process”.

“Many believe Ofsted has lost its way and is no longer a reliable source of information on the effectiveness of the schools it inspects.

“It is encouraging that the new government is committed to reform of the inspectorate. These findings indicate they are right to do so.”

Latest education roles from

Chief Financial Officer – Lighthouse Learning Trust

Chief Financial Officer – Lighthouse Learning Trust

FEA

Chief Financial and Operations Officer

Chief Financial and Operations Officer

Tenax Schools Trust

Managers (FE)

Managers (FE)

Click

Executive Director of Finance – Moulton College

Executive Director of Finance – Moulton College

FEA

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

IncludEd Conference: Get Inclusion Ready

As we all clamber to make sense of the new Ofsted framework, it can be hard to know where...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Helping every learner use AI responsibly

AI didn’t wait to be invited into the classroom. It burst in mid-lesson. Across UK schools, pupils are already...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Retire Early, Live Fully: What Teachers Need to Consider First

Specialist Financial Adviser, William Adams, from Wesleyan Financial Services discusses what teachers should be considering when it comes to...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

AI Safety: From DfE Guidance to Classroom Confidence

Darren Coxon, edtech consultant and AI education specialist, working with The National College, explores the DfE’s expectations for AI...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Ofsted

Ofsted tweaks inspection framework just days before roll-out

Changes come after concerns in pilot inspections over increased workload, pressure on staff and how achievement is evaluated

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

High Court rejects NAHT’s Ofsted report card challenge

Leaders' union to consider appeal and will consult members on industrial action after judicial review application refused

Lydia Chantler-Hicks
Ofsted

Nudge unit calls for ‘eye-catching’ national Ofsted inspection survey

The Behavioural Insights Team also recommends Ofsted 'emphasise' in inspector training how to reduce the formality of conversations

Samantha Booth
Ofsted

Small schools demand Ofsted clarity over report card impact

Inspectors will conduct three learning walks on the first day of inspections and hold at least five 'reflection meetings'...

Lydia Chantler-Hicks

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One comment

  1. Steven Lilley

    Totally agree
    Sack Ofsted and league tables (they add no value to education), get the love of learning back – GCSE and A Levels are too much factory rote learning and too much content driven no wonder non attendance is growing rapidly and behaviour is dropping.
    I’d also like to remove parental choice go back to catchment areas and give equal funding to all. I’d also shut down every private school and take all the money that parents pay as a tax donation and allow state schools to take the buildings over. I would also, for secondary schools, have a 4 day working week (8-4) with every fourth Friday a CPD day that has proper, well organised, development training could be a visit to a site of interest, a lecture, a session led by x y z and recognition of the training. Staff could have a six month break for every 7 years they are in the profession again to increase recruitment and retention
    I’d also bin off MATs as the CEOs are collecting ridiculous amounts of money for nothing.