News

Building Futures Enterprise Academy Trust issued financial notice to improve

A Cumbrian academy trust with just two schools has been warned over its finances and had its spending powers restricted – becoming the latest in a growing list of primary-only trusts to run into difficulties.

The Building Futures Enterprise Academy Trust, sponsor of Tebay Primary and Yanwath Primary schools in Penrith, has been issued with a financial notice to improve by the Education Funding Agency.

Mike Pettifer, the director of the EFA’s academies and maintained schools group, said officials were concerned about a “lack of effective financial management and governance and appropriate internal controls” within the trust.

I remain concerned about the lack of effective financial management and governance and appropriate internal controls

The EFA has also highlighted the trust’s failure to discharge and manage its governance composition “in a way that commands broad public support” and said it had also failed to demonstrate “adequate financial control and appropriate oversight of financial transactions”.

The trust has failed to demonstrate effective budget setting and monitoring of timely monthly management accounts and has not been able to provide assurances on its current and future financial position, officials said.

According to the Building Futures Enterprise trust’s website, it was set up in March 2015 to meet the needs of small rural schools in isolated areas and had “unique structures” that reflected those needs.

The website read: “As our trust potentially grows, we will offer a mutually beneficial network to small schools so that they can continue to flourish as part of their community”

However the financial problems highlighted in the government’s improvement notice expose again the growing issues with primary school-only trusts.

Schools Week has previously reported how some trusts are increasingly considering mergers to stay afloat financially, with the national schools commissioner Sir David Carter stating his desire for more smaller trusts to join forces.

Hugh Greenway, chief executive of the Elliot Foundation academies trust – the second largest all-primary trust in the country – previously told Schools Week that primary-only trusts would need more than 25 schools to become financially sustainable.

Leaders at Building Futures Enterprise must now complete a financial management and governance action plan, reconstruct its board and submit accurate monthly management accounts.

They must also submit minutes of each meeting of the trust and its sub-committees to the government, along with a detailed plan about the “exact future of the trust”.

Until the conditions of the notice are met, it will lose a lot of its spending power because the government has withdrawn the authority it normally delegates to sponsors for certain transactions.

The trust has been approached for comment.

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments

  1. David Barry

    There are going to be more and more stories like this. A combination of financial stress which all schools share, and the inherent lack of resilience in the Academy model.

    What is still unclear is what happens if an Academy Chain goes bust?

    (Of course if you believe in market driven solutions some Free Schools and Academies WILL go bust just as some businesses do, weeds out the inefficient dontcha know, but then what happens to the pupils?)

  2. The academies model was always flawed. Schools needed to be large enough to be able to allocate resources to financial management. This was impossible for both small secondary schools and most primaries. But since 2010 schools have been encouraged, bribed, coerced into converting. This was sold as offering more ‘freedom’. But small academy trusts are increasingly finding they’re not large enough to cope with the financial and legal burdens or achieve economies of scale. They have no option but to join a larger MAT and risk being under more control than ever they were when under local authority supervision.