Leaked proposals that would deny student loans to pupils who achieve fewer than three Ds in their A-levels have been branded a “retrograde step” by school leaders.
The Sunday Times reported yesterday that the independent review of higher education, chaired by former investment banker Philip Augar, is expected to recommend proposals to shake-up the university sector.
That includes barring pupils who do not achieve three Ds in their A-levels, or equivalent qualifications, from accessing student loans to fund a university degree.
Instead those pupils, estimated to be around 20,000, will be offered loans for cheaper technical or vocational courses in further education colleges.
The review is also expected to recommend that tuition fees are slashed from £9,250 per year to between £6,500 and £7.500.
But Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said the union would be “very concerned about any move which reduces the opportunity of young people to go to university”.
“Given the importance of improving social mobility, it would be a retrograde step to do anything which would reduce access to university,” he said.
“Students accepted on to courses with lower grades may need appropriate support during their studies but we should not shut the door on them.”
The proposals, leaked to the Sunday Times, come as figures last month showed more than one in three school pupils who applied to university this year had some kind of unconditional offer.
The research seemed to support schools’ fears that these offers – which promote university places to pupils regardless of their A-level results – result in pupils making less effort in their final year.
Today the Office for National Statistics also announced changes on how the government accounts for student loans, with loans that are unlikely to be repaid now to be classed as government spending.
Currently 45 per cent of student loans handed out in England are not expected to be paid back in full, leading to estimations this would increase the government’s budget deficit by the equivalent of £12 billion pounds.
There has been suggestions this change could also impact the higher education review, with the government now warned against decisions that could result in the return of a cap on student numbers.
Barton added: “It is certainly the case that university might not always be the best option, and there should be a range of high-quality routes available.
“But students should be able to make an informed choice on what route works best for them rather than it being determined by an arbitrary threshold around the eligibility of grades for student loans.”