ASCL survey: 9 in 10 leaders believe inspection isn’t consistent, fair or accurate

Nine in ten school leaders believe Ofsted inspections fail to “consistently, fairly and accurately” judge their schools, an ASCL survey has revealed.

Despite three quarters of respondents reporting that Ofsted’s new inspection regime is an improvement on the old framework, the vast majority are still not happy with the set-up, the union claims.

The findings raise questions about the recent claim by Amanda Spielman that just a “small and vocal minority” oppose the new inspection approach.

Ofsted has also released data from its post-inspection surveys, which shows that 88.6 per cent of 1,336 respondents strongly agreed or agreed with the statement that they were satisfied with the way the inspection was carried out.

But ASCL’s survey of 793 leaders, not all of whom have experienced the new inspection system first-hand, found that 89 per cent believe the current system fails to consistently, fairly and accurately judge the performance of schools and colleges.

The union has warned of “significant disquiet” over the perception that Ofsted favours a specific curriculum model of a two-year key stage 4. Ofsted has repeatedly denied such a bias, but multiple heads have hit out after their schools were downgraded after being accused of narrowing the curriculum.

Geoff Barton, ASCL’s general secretary, will use his speech at the union’s annual conference tomorrow to call on Ofsted to provide “greater clarity, reassurance and consistency”.

“The great shame is that this one topic risks overshadowing the generally positive reception of the new framework.

“So our message to Ofsted is this. You have to grasp this issue, and provide schools with greater clarity, reassurance and consistency. We have to know exactly where we stand.”

Of the respondents to ASCL’s survey, 61 per cent said Ofsted graded judgments should be scrapped in favour of narrative judgments, while 29 per cent believe they should be reformed in some way. Just 10 per cent want to see them retained in their current form.

Barton will say tomorrow that the survey shows that members believe graded judgements are “crude and stigmatising”.

“Labelling a school as ‘inadequate’ is not smart. It is counter-productive,” he said.

“Ofsted inspections remain inconsistent. Many leaders feel it is the luck of the draw. The verdict feels as if it depends more on the inspection team than the framework.”

Schools Week asked Ofsted for a full breakdown of its survey responses, but did not receive a response.

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Terry Pearson

    I am not surprised by the response to the ASCL survey. Unfortunately Ofsted will not be able to provide valid reassurances, clarity or consistency.

    Despite numerous attempts Ofsted has not yet been able to develop a suitable system for testing the trustworthiness of inspection judgements. The report on this link provides a review of the inspectorate’s last effort to do so which highlights the very misleading conclusions drawn from the test.'s_test_of_the_reliability_of_short_inspections

    It really is time for independent scrutiny and validation of Ofsted judgements to become part of the inspection landscape.

  2. rich atterton

    9/10 seems really positive… yet 10% dissatisfaction is too high. The current high stakes accountability system means that “10%” experience devastating consequences. Im all for accountability but it has to be proportionate. The current model is not!

  3. The academic research also suggests being graded ‘Outstanding’ has little impact for pupils in the long-term. Let me know if and when anyone wants to read the research… Also, Terry’s comments and research is important, as well as Frank Coffield.

    Somebody at Ofsted HQ simply isn’t listening to the profession or reading the research and is using ‘what parents want’ as an excuse to peddle voodoo-gradings…