Edtech

AI questions to be trialled in SATs moderator tests

Government launches trial in bid to cut costs and school workload, amid push to 'harness the power of AI'

Government launches trial in bid to cut costs and school workload, amid push to 'harness the power of AI'

Exclusive

Standardisation tests for SATs moderators will include questions written by artificial intelligence (AI) under a new government trial to cut costs and school workload.

The Standards and Testing Agency (STA) is conducting the pilot amid a push to “harness the power of AI technology across the sector”. 

Key stage 2 moderators must pass a standardisation exercise to ensure they have the “required knowledge” to examine English writing teacher assessments. 

Unlike maths and reading SATs, English writing is marked by teachers, with local authorities required to moderate 25 per cent of maintained school and academy papers. 

Trial ‘to cut costs’ 

But moderators must pass one of three standardisation tests to get approval. This year, the third test will be produced using AI.

The pilot aims to “explore whether large language models (LLMs) can help overcome ongoing challenges with standardisation exercise production, including sourcing sufficient scripts from schools and reducing associated costs,” the government said.

Since 2021-22, the Australian Council for Educational Research has created the exercises, using real samples of year 6 children’s work. 

But the Department for Education said “collecting suitable pupil writing samples is expensive and adds extra work for schools”. 

The trial follows “18 months of research [into] how effectively LLMs can generate scripts that are representative of the work and ability of year 6 pupils”. 

To produce the AI tests, STA’s “expert assessment researcher will design prompts” based on the teacher assessment framework to “generate draft pupil scripts”. 

The agency will then “edit and carefully review” them to “ensure they meet our standards for accuracy, validity and reliability” before they are used in the test.

LAs can opt out

Local authorities can “opt out of participating … if they have concerns about the use of LLMs in the creation of the materials”. Their moderators will instead sit the other exercises.

Schools Week approached the 15 biggest councils in England to find out if they were taking part. 

Four responded, with three saying they will be involved. 

Kent, England’s largest local authority, which employs “around 60 moderators” who teach in primary schools or work as English subject leaders each year, said its reviews of the AI scripts found them “to be reliable”. 

Dr Mick Walker, president of the Chartered Institute of Educational Assessors, said offering the AI tests “as an optional extension to normal procedures” meant it “does not pose a risk to pupils”.  

Dr Mick Walker

“The inclusion of feedback presents an opportunity for moderators … to inform future developments.”

Any future decisions following the trial would be subject to the government’s response to the curriculum and assessment review panel’s final report. 

A frequently asked questions document produced by the agency ahead of the trial said the DfE’s “overarching strategy is to harness the power of AI technology across the sector”. 

However, the agency added it had “no plans to use AI to develop statutory national curriculum tests or assessments for primary pupils”. 

AI’s ‘inevitable’ growth

Duncan Baldwin, an education consultant, said it was inevitable that AI would be used increasingly to support time-consuming and expensive tasks in education.

“AI can deliver huge benefits for teachers, school leaders and the government.”

Schools Week revealed last month that Ofsted inspectors trialled AI to save them time while taking notes during visits. 

But the watchdog decided against any wider rollout as it felt the tools created more work, rather than streamline inspections. 

The DfE also published AI toolkits for schools earlier this year. The guidance said leaders should plan for its “wider use” – including to analyse budgets and help plan CPD. 

Ofsted also revealed that it used AI to process responses to its consultation on planned report cards “to improve efficiency”. It noted this was becoming “more common across government”.

Latest education roles from

Senior Quality Officer

Senior Quality Officer

University of Lancashire

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Minerva Learning Trust

Head of Programme 2D Studies – City Lit

Head of Programme 2D Studies – City Lit

FEA

Group Director of Governance & Company Secretary

Group Director of Governance & Company Secretary

New City College

Sponsored posts

Sponsored post

Helping every learner use AI responsibly

AI didn’t wait to be invited into the classroom. It burst in mid-lesson. Across UK schools, pupils are already...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

Retire Early, Live Fully: What Teachers Need to Consider First

Specialist Financial Adviser, William Adams, from Wesleyan Financial Services discusses what teachers should be considering when it comes to...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

AI Safety: From DfE Guidance to Classroom Confidence

Darren Coxon, edtech consultant and AI education specialist, working with The National College, explores the DfE’s expectations for AI...

SWAdvertorial
Sponsored post

How accurate spend information is helping schools identify savings

One the biggest issues schools face when it comes to saving money on everyday purchases is a lack of...

SWAdvertorial

More from this theme

Edtech

Schools wanted to become edtech ‘testbeds’

Pilot to build 'evidence base' on impact of workload-cutting tech

Jack Dyson
Edtech

Schools will get discounted updates to keep Windows 10 running

Microsoft will no longer provide free software updates for the operating system after October 14

Rhi Storer
Edtech

Bett organiser to exit Russia after pressure from education sector 

Russian events will be led by a local leadership team - but Hyve 'won't profit or invest in' ...

James Carr

Your thoughts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *